+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail?


    Today I was going to write about how the Bush folk were subverting, not just our constitution, but virtually every organ of government; conducting a systematic coup of government agencies and silencing anyone within who refuses to toe the radical right party line.

    Hardly a week goes by that we don't hear from a current or former career civil servant muzzled by this administration.


    NASAs top meteorologist was disciplined by an administration crony appointee for publicly confirming that global warming was real, of human origins and a happening thing. (Full Story)

    Lou Fisher, a 36-year veteran of the non-partisan Congressional Research Service, wrote that he believed the Bush administration had exceeded its legal authority when it allowed the NSA to spy on Americans. The next day he was disciplined by his politically appointed superior and told, in no uncertain ter.ms, to shut up or he would be reassigned to a less sensitive job. (Full Story)


    Of course we all remember what the administration did to General Shinseki when he bucked administration neo-cons who believed they could conquer and occupy Iraq on the cheap. And Ambassador Joe Wilson, (and his wife,) when he contradicted their false claims that Iraq had tried to buy yellow cake from Niger. The pattern has become clear to anyone paying attention. The term "thugs" jumps to mind.

    But we lefties can write about such stuff until the cows come home and only other lefties will read them nodding like bobble head dolls.

    But today my pal at Quality News Network, Tony Seton, sent me a piece by former Reagan official, Paul Craig Roberts. In it Robert's poses a terrifying possibility, one that even my dark and troubled mind had not considered. That the Bush administration may be using materials sucked up in it's domestic spying operations to blackmail political opponents.

    When a Reagan conservative slaps such an accusation on the table, you have to sit up and take notice. This time it can't be dismissed as simply more left wing paranoia. Roberts served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration, later as Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of the conservative, National Review.


    (The piece was very long so I edited it down and highlighted key points for those of you who may want to just scan it.)


    Who Will Save America?
    By Paul Craig Roberts
    Article in Full Here

    A number of readers have asked me when did I undergo my epiphany, abandon right-wing Reaganism and become an apostle of truth and justice.

    I appreciate the friendly sentiment, but there is a great deal of misconception in the question.

    When I saw that the neoconservative response to 9/11 was to turn a war against stateless terrorism into military attacks on Muslim states, I realized that the Bush administration was committing a strategic blunder with open-ended disastrous consequences for the US that, in the end, would destroy Bush, the Republican Party, and the conservative movement.

    My warning was not prompted by an effort to save Bush's bacon. I have never been any party's political or ideological servant. I used my positions in the congressional staff and the Reagan administration to change the economic policy of the United States. In my efforts, I found more allies among influential Democrats, such as Senate Finance Committee Chairman Russell Long, Joint Economic Committee Chairman Lloyd Bentsen and my Georgia Tech fraternity brother Sam Nunn, than I did among traditional Republicans who were only concerned about the budget deficit.

    My goals were to reverse the Keynesian policy mix that caused worsening "Phillips curve" trade-offs between employment and inflation and to cure the stagflation that destroyed Jimmy Carter's presidency. No one has seen a "Phillips curve" trade-off or experienced stagflation since the supply-side policy was implemented. (These gains are now being eroded by the labor arbitrage that is replacing American workers with foreign ones. In January 2004 I teamed up with Democratic Senator Charles Schumer in the New York Times and at a Brookings Institution conference in a joint effort to call attention to the erosion of the US economy and Americans' job prospects by outsourcing.)

    In Reagan's time we did not recognize that neoconservatives had a Jacobin frame of mind. Perhaps we were not paying close enough attention. We saw neoconservatives as former left-wingers who had realized that the Soviet Union might be a threat after all. We regarded them as allies against Henry Kissinger's inclination to reach an unfavorable accommodation with the Soviet Union. Kissinger thought, or was believed to think, that Americans had no stomach for a drawn-out contest and that he needed to strike a deal before the Soviets staked the future on a lack of American resolution.

    Reagan was certainly no neoconservative. He went along with some of their schemes, but when neoconservatives went too far, he fired them. George W. Bush promotes them. The left-wing might object that the offending neocons in the Reagan administration were later pardoned, but there was sincere objection to criminalizing what was seen, rightly or wrongly, as stalwartness in standing up to communism.

    Neoconservatives were disappointed with Reagan. Reagan's goal was to END the cold war, not to WIN it. He made common purpose with Gorbachev and ENDED the cold war. It is the new Jacobins, the neoconservatives, who have exploited this victory by taking military bases to Russian borders.

    I have always objected to injustice. My writings about prosecutorial abuse have put me at odds with "law and order conservatives." I have written extensively about wrongful convictions, both of the rich and famous and the poor and unknown.

    cont...
    Last edited by sojustask; 02-13-2006 at 05:36 AM. Reason: fixed word te.rms

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    .
    Americans have forgotten what it takes to remain free. Instead, every ideology, every group is determined to use government to advance its agenda. As the government's power grows, the people are eclipsed.

    We have reached a point where the Bush administration is determined to totally eclipse the people. Bewitched by neoconservatives and lustful for power, the Bush administration and the Republican Party are aligning themselves firmly against the American people. Their first victims, of course, were the true conservatives.

    Having eliminated internal opposition, the Bush administration is now using blackmail obtained through illegal spying on American citizens to silence the media and the opposition party.

    Before flinching at my assertion of blackmail, ask yourself why President Bush refuses to obey the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The purpose of the FISA court is to ensure that administrations do not spy for partisan political reasons. The warrant requirement is to ensure that a panel of independent federal judges hears a legitimate reason for the spying, thus protecting a president from the temptation to abuse the powers of government. The only reason for the Bush administration to evade the court is that the Bush administration had no legitimate reasons for its spying. This should be obvious even to a naif.

    The United States is undergoing a coup against the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, civil liberties, and democracy itself. The "liberal press" has been co-opted. As everyone must know by now, the New York Times has totally failed its First Amendment obligations, allowing Judith Miller to make war propaganda for the Bush administration, suppressing for an entire year the news that the Bush administration was illegally spying on American citizens, and denying coverage to Al Gore's speech that challenged the criminal deeds of the Bush administration.

    The TV networks mimic Fox News' faux patriotism. Anyone who depends on print, TV, or right-wing talk radio media is totally misinformed. The Bush administration has achieved a de facto Ministry of Propaganda.

    The years of illegal spying have given the Bush administration power over the media and the opposition. Journalists and Democratic politicians don't want to have their adulterous affairs broadcast over television or to see their favorite online porn sites revealed in headlines in the local press with their names attached. Only people willing to risk such disclosures can stand up for the country.

    Homeland Security and the Patriot Act are not our protectors. They undermine our protection by trashing the Constitution and the civil liberties it guarantees. Those with a tyrannical turn of mind have always used fear and hysteria to overcome obstacles to their power and to gain new means of silencing opposition.

    Consider the no-fly list. This list has no purpose whatsoever but to harass and disrupt the livelihoods of Bush's critics. If a known terrorist were to show up at check-in, he would be arrested and taken into custody, not told that he could not fly. What sense does it make to tell someone who is not subject to arrest and who has cleared screening that he or she cannot fly? How is this person any more dangerous than any other passenger?

    If Senator Ted Kennedy, a famous senator with two martyred brothers, can be put on a no-fly list, as he was for several weeks, anyone can be put on the list. The list has no accountability. People on the list cannot even find out why they are on the list. There is no recourse, no procedure for correcting mistakes.

    I am certain that there are more Bush critics on the list than there are terrorists. According to reports, the list now comprises 80,000 names! This number must greatly dwarf the total number of terrorists in the world and certainly the number of known terrorists.

    How long before members of the opposition party, should there be one, find that they cannot return to Washington for important votes, because they have been placed on the no-fly list? What oversight does Congress or a panel of federal judges exercise over the list to make sure there are valid reasons for placing people on the list?

    If the government can have a no-fly list, it can have a no-drive list. The Iraqi resistance has demonstrated the destructive potential of car bombs. If we are to believe the government's story about the Murrah Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City, Timothy McVeigh showed that a rental truck bomb could destroy a large office building. Indeed, what is to prevent the government from having a list of people who are not allowed to leave their homes? If the Bush administration can continue its policy of picking up people anywhere in the world and detaining them indefinitely without having to show any evidence for their detention, it can do whatever it wishes.

    Many readers have told me, some gleefully, that I will be placed on the no-fly list along with all other outspoken critics of the growth in unaccountable executive power and war based on lies and deception. It is just a matter of time. Unchecked, unaccountable power grows more audacious by the day.

    cont...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    .

    Congress and the media have no fight in them, and neither, apparently, do the American people. Considering the feebleness of the opposition, perhaps the best strategy is for the opposition to shut up, not merely for our own safety but, more importantly, to remove any impediments to Bush administration self-destruction.

    The sooner the Bush administration realizes its goals of attacking Iran, Syria, and the Shia militias in Lebanon, the more likely the administration will collapse in the maelstrom before it achieves a viable police state. Hamas' victory in the recent Palestinian elections indicates that Muslim outrage over further US aggression in the Middle East has the potential to produce uprisings in Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. Not even Karl Rove and Fox "News" could spin Bush out of the catastrophe.

    Debate is dead in America for two reasons: One is that the media concentration permitted in the 1990s has put news and opinion in the hands of a few corporate executives who do not dare risk their broadcasting licenses by getting on the wrong side of government, or their advertising revenues by becoming "controversial." The media follows a safe line and purveys only politically correct information. The other reason is that Americans today are no longer enthralled by debate. They just want to hear what they want to hear. The right-wing, left-wing, and libertarians alike preach to the faithful. Democracy cannot succeed when there is no debate.

    Americans need to understand that many interests are using the "war on terror" to achieve their agendas. The Federalist Society is using the "war on terror" to achieve its agenda of concentrating power in the executive and packing the Supreme Court to this effect. The neocons are using the war to achieve their agenda of Israeli hegemony in the Middle East. Police agencies are using the war to remove constraints on their powers and to make themselves less accountable. Republicans are using the war to achieve one-party rule--theirs. The Bush administration is using the war to avoid accountability and evade constraints on executive powers. Arms industries, or what President Eisenhower called the "military-industrial complex," are using the war to fatten profits. Terrorism experts are using the war to gain visibility. Security firms are using it to gain customers. Readers can add to this list at will. The lack of debate gives carte blanche to these agendas.

    One certainty prevails. Bush is committing America to a path of violence and coercion, and he is getting away with it.

    .

    Stephen Pizzo
    www.newsforreal.com

  4. #4
    coontie is offline Vashudeva; Ferryman - doing the work...
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,392

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    "Who will save America?" In the End, we will, way BEFORE "They" get our
    backs against the wall...

    "Don't Tread on Me!" is still alive and well in the silence of the American
    Spirit, out on the streets!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,272

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Quote Originally Posted by coontie
    "Who will save America?" In the End, we will, way BEFORE "They" get our
    backs against the wall...

    "Don't Tread on Me!" is still alive and well in the silence of the American
    Spirit, out on the streets!
    Good answer. Vermont one of the most progressive states in the Union is presently in the process of taking the Gov’t back.

    Military resister to highlight Vermont anti-war rally
    By Shay Totten | Vermont Guardian

    http://www.vermontguardian.com/local...WarRally.shtml

    posted February 8, 2006

    MONTPELIER — Hundreds of Vermonters are expected at a demonstration Saturday in front of the Statehouse to demand that Vermont’s elected representatives call on Pres. Bush to immediately remove all troops from Iraq.

    The 2 p.m. rally will feature Pablo Paredes, a Navy Petty officer who, in 2004, refused to board an Iraq-bound ship because he did not believe the invasion of Iraq was justified. Eventually, his case went to court, a judge ruled in Paredes’ favor, and he was given an honorable discharge from the Navy. He is now trying to register as a conscientious objector.

    Paredes, who grew up in the Bronx, NY, and currently lives in California, told the Guardian that is looking forward to being in Vermont, and has been watching the progress of last year’s Town Meeting Day resolutions.

    Last year, 48 towns voted in favor of some form of the measure calling on the state to examine the impact that the large call-up of Vermont National Guard troops has on Vermont, its resources and its families. Legislation was subsequently introduced in the House and made its way to the House floor before a fractured vote channeled it back to committee, where it remains.

    “I, as many others who work for peace, have noticed the absence of true democracy in our country best represented in the outcome of the recent town meetings, here in Vermont,” said Paredes in an e-mail interview. (The full interview appears at the bottom of this article.)

    “I followed this story and the overwhelming response of the apologetics for war was, ‘Well, it doesn't mean anything; these resolutions are nonbinding to the state.’ [T]here can be no excuse for the state of Vermont going against a near unanimous call of these town meetings. But this is the reality of representative democracy. It very rarely represents people who don't have economic influence over it.”

    In early January, Vermont Says Not to War, a coalition of veterans, soldiers’ families, labor activists, civil libertarians, faith-based organizations and anti-war activists, kicked off a campaign in favor of strong legislation the states, “Vermont and its citizens call on the president to bring all the troops home now and take care of them when they get home.”

    Protest organizers are also calling on Vermonters to pledge to undertake acts of nonviolent civil disobedience as a way to pressure lawmakers into taking up the resolution.

    CONT AT SITE

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Well, now I wish I was in Vermont. This sounds like great fun!

    Lady Mod

  7. #7
    coontie is offline Vashudeva; Ferryman - doing the work...
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,392

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Quote Originally Posted by sojustask
    Well, now I wish I was in Vermont. This sounds like great fun!

    Lady Mod

    Patience honey, there's more to come...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    345

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Sojustask, thank you for all this information!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ette
    Sojustask, thank you for all this information!
    You are welcome but Stephen Pizzo, retired investigative reporter wrote it, I just have permission to post his stuff.

    You can read his daily blog at www.newsforreal.com

    He's a good writer.

    Namaste'

    Lady Mod

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    345

    Re: Domestic Wiretaps and Blackmail? Who Will Save America?

    Thank you, this post belongs ON TOP here it goes!

Similar Threads

  1. Wonder plant could save America!
    By Worried_in_the_USA in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-04-2012, 06:46 PM
  2. World Leaders Kick obama in 'balls', Save America
    By pwrone in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-15-2009, 03:06 PM
  3. Save America, outlaw foriegn cars!
    By Worried_in_the_USA in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-23-2009, 11:26 AM
  4. Should we save America, Iraq or both?
    By southp4 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-30-2007, 09:17 PM
  5. Here's how America could save some $$
    By Grim17 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-09-2007, 04:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Add / Edit Tags
000, 6666, 9/11, accountability, accusation, act, acts, add, administration, advance, advertising, aff, affairs, age, agendas, ain, alive, allowed, allowing, ambassador, amendment, america, american, answer, anti, appears, arms, article, assistant, associate, attacking, attacks, attention, authority, avoid, based, ben, blackmail, blanche, blu, bombs, borders, bring, bro, broadcast, building, buy, cake, called, calling, campaign, cannot, care, career, case, caused, cer, chairman, chan, charles, che, citizens, civil, claims, cli, close, co-op, collapse, commit, committing, common, communism, complex, concerned, confirming, congressional, cons, conservative, contest, continue, convictions, corporate, correct, country, coup, cure, current, customers, dark, day, dead, deeds, demand, democrats, demons, des, destroyed, destruction, disrupt, doesn, domestic spying, don, dow, early, east, economic, editor, egypt, elected, electio, ended, entire, error, executives, exercise, experts, faith, faithful, false, families, famous, fat, favorite, fear, feature, federal, fired, first amendment, fisa, fla, floor, fly, foreign, forgot, forward, fox, fra, front, future, gain, general, george, george w. bush, georgia, global, good, great, group, growth, had, hands, happening, head, hey, his, home, homes, honey, honorable, html, huma, human, ial, ian, illegally, impact, important, industrial, industries, influence, institution, intelligence, inter, internal, interview, investigative, ion, jimmy, job, joe, joint, jordan, judge, kennedy, kicked, labor, large, last, law, lawmakers, legal, legitimate, liberal, line, lloyd, local, long, longer, mail, main, materials, matter, mea, measure, meeting, members, mind, ministry, misinformed, more, movemen, movement, national, need, needed, neo, networks, new york times, niger, number, odds, office, official, offs, onli, online, only, open, operations, organ, organizations, outrage, overwhelming, owns, pablo, packing, page, pakistan, pal, par, party, paul, paying, peace, person, pet, piece, point, police state, policy, politically, poor, por, porn, pos, post, potential, power, presiden, presidency, prevent, process, profits, promotes, protecting, protection, quality, question, quote, rage, rally, rated, read, reagan, real, reality, reasons, refused, refuses, register, remember, ren, rental, replacing, reporter, republican, republicans, research, response, retired, revealed, rich, rio, risk, rove, roy, russia, russian, safe, safety, sam, sca, scan, schemes, science, secretary, senate, sense, sensitive, served, service, ship, showed, shut, shut up, simply, sincere, site, soo, sooner, sounds, sourcing, staff, state, states, stephen, story, strategy, street, strike, succeed, supply, suppressing, supreme, supreme court, surveillance, taken, takes, talk, tech, ted, terror, terrorist, test, the new york times, the wall, they, thought, thugs, tie, times, today, told, tom, top, totally, town, trade, trashing, treasury, troops, truck, truth, tse, union, united, united states, url, veteran, veterans, victory, viole, violence, violent, voted, votes, wall, warming, warning, watching, week, weeks, welcome, wilson, wing, wire, work, workers, worse, write, wrong, year, years, york

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •