+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 34

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    23

    New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    NEW IDEA FOR ABORTION PARTY: AID THE ENEMY
    November 23, 2005


    In the Iraq war so far, the U.S. military has deposed a dictator who had already used weapons of mass destruction and would have used them again. As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger.

    Saddam is on trial. His psychopath sons are dead. We've captured or killed scores of foreign terrorists in Baghdad. Rape rooms and torture chambers are back in R. Kelly's Miami Beach mansion where they belong.

    The Iraqi people have voted in two free, democratic elections this year. In a rash and unconsidered move, they even gave women the right to vote.

    Iraqis have ratified a constitution and will vote for a National Assembly next month. The long-suffering Kurds are free and no longer require 24/7 protection by U.S. fighter jets.

    Libya's Moammar Gadhafi has voluntarily dismantled his weapons of mass destruction, Syria has withdrawn from Lebanon, and the Palestinians are holding elections.

    (Last but certainly not least, the Marsh Arabs' wetlands ecosystem in central Iraq that Saddam drained is being restored, so even the Democrats' war goals in Iraq are being met.)

    The American military has accomplished all this with just over 2,000 deaths. These deaths are especially painful because they fall on our greatest Americans. Still, look at what the military has done and compare the cost to 600,000 deaths in the Civil War, 400,000 deaths in World War II and 60,000 deaths in Vietnam (before Walter Cronkite finally threw in the towel and declared victory for North Vietnam).

    What is known as a "hawk" in today's Democratic Party looks at what our military has accomplished and — during the war, while our troops are in harm's way — demands that we withdraw our troops.

    In an upbeat speech now being aired repeatedly on al-Jazeera, last week Rep. John Murtha said U.S. troops "cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home." Claiming the war is "a flawed policy wrapped in illusion," Murtha said the "American public is way ahead of us."

    Fed up with being endlessly told "the American people" have turned against the war in Iraq, Republicans asked the Democrats to show what they had in their hand and vote on a resolution to withdraw the troops.

    By a vote of 403-3, the House of Representatives wasn't willing to bet that "the American people" want to pull out of Iraq. (This vote also marked the first time in recent history that the Democrats did not respond to getting their butts kicked by demanding a recount.)

    The vote is all the more shocking because of what it says about the Democrats' motives in attacking the war — as well as alerting us to three members of Congress we really need to keep an eye on.

    It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it's time to bring the troops home. Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal — or "redeployment," as liberals pointlessly distinguish — will delay our inevitable victory and cost more American lives.

    Anti-war protests in the U.S. during the Vietnam War were a major source of moral support to the enemy. We know that not only from simple common sense, but from the statements of former North Vietnamese military leaders who evidently didn't get the memo telling them not to say so. In an Aug. 3, 1995, interview in The Wall Street Journal, Bui Tin, a former colonel in the North Vietnamese army, called the American peace movement "essential" to the North Vietnamese victory.

    "Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American anti-war movement," he said. "Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses."

    What are we to make of the fact that — as we now know — the Democrats don't even want to withdraw troops from Iraq? By their own account, there is no merit to their demands. Before the vote, Democrats could at least defend themselves from sedition by pleading stupidity. Now we know they don't believe what they are saying about the war. (Thanks to that vote, the Islamo-fascists know it, too.)

    The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.

    They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.

    COPYRIGHT 2005 ANN COULTER

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,663

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARGER
    NEW IDEA FOR ABORTION PARTY: AID THE ENEMY
    November 23, 2005


    In the Iraq war so far, the U.S. military has deposed a dictator who had already used weapons of mass destruction and would have used them again. As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger.

    Saddam is on trial. His psychopath sons are dead. We've captured or killed scores of foreign terrorists in Baghdad. Rape rooms and torture chambers are back in R. Kelly's Miami Beach mansion where they belong.

    The Iraqi people have voted in two free, democratic elections this year. In a rash and unconsidered move, they even gave women the right to vote.

    Iraqis have ratified a constitution and will vote for a National Assembly next month. The long-suffering Kurds are free and no longer require 24/7 protection by U.S. fighter jets.

    Libya's Moammar Gadhafi has voluntarily dismantled his weapons of mass destruction, Syria has withdrawn from Lebanon, and the Palestinians are holding elections.

    (Last but certainly not least, the Marsh Arabs' wetlands ecosystem in central Iraq that Saddam drained is being restored, so even the Democrats' war goals in Iraq are being met.)

    The American military has accomplished all this with just over 2,000 deaths. These deaths are especially painful because they fall on our greatest Americans. Still, look at what the military has done and compare the cost to 600,000 deaths in the Civil War, 400,000 deaths in World War II and 60,000 deaths in Vietnam (before Walter Cronkite finally threw in the towel and declared victory for North Vietnam).

    What is known as a "hawk" in today's Democratic Party looks at what our military has accomplished and — during the war, while our troops are in harm's way — demands that we withdraw our troops.

    In an upbeat speech now being aired repeatedly on al-Jazeera, last week Rep. John Murtha said U.S. troops "cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home." Claiming the war is "a flawed policy wrapped in illusion," Murtha said the "American public is way ahead of us."

    Fed up with being endlessly told "the American people" have turned against the war in Iraq, Republicans asked the Democrats to show what they had in their hand and vote on a resolution to withdraw the troops.

    By a vote of 403-3, the House of Representatives wasn't willing to bet that "the American people" want to pull out of Iraq. (This vote also marked the first time in recent history that the Democrats did not respond to getting their butts kicked by demanding a recount.)

    The vote is all the more shocking because of what it says about the Democrats' motives in attacking the war — as well as alerting us to three members of Congress we really need to keep an eye on.

    It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it's time to bring the troops home. Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal — or "redeployment," as liberals pointlessly distinguish — will delay our inevitable victory and cost more American lives.

    Anti-war protests in the U.S. during the Vietnam War were a major source of moral support to the enemy. We know that not only from simple common sense, but from the statements of former North Vietnamese military leaders who evidently didn't get the memo telling them not to say so. In an Aug. 3, 1995, interview in The Wall Street Journal, Bui Tin, a former colonel in the North Vietnamese army, called the American peace movement "essential" to the North Vietnamese victory.

    "Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American anti-war movement," he said. "Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses."

    What are we to make of the fact that — as we now know — the Democrats don't even want to withdraw troops from Iraq? By their own account, there is no merit to their demands. Before the vote, Democrats could at least defend themselves from sedition by pleading stupidity. Now we know they don't believe what they are saying about the war. (Thanks to that vote, the Islamo-fascists know it, too.)

    The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.

    They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.

    COPYRIGHT 2005 ANN COULTER

    Ha..ha..ha..ha.. That's like posting articles from G. Gordon Liddy or Pat Robertson. Anybody who actually takes what a deranged, psychopathic vampire like Coulter says seriously enough to re-post her subterranean sewage is in desperate need of immediate help themselves. She makes her living as a professional embarrasment to the human race and makes no bones about it. Geez... Get a grip man.
    Last edited by dchristie; 11-25-2005 at 07:02 AM.

  3. #3
    umdkook Guest

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    this is barely even worth responding to, except to say its barely worth responding to.

    You somehow beleive this woman that all those things were "accomplished" with only 2000 deaths??? ahahah kudos to a job, well, er, done.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    ann coulter.i take it she's a woman.........not easy to tell from photos.could be a maneqin.science is so advanced these days!nothing a red blooded american would wanna waste his manhood on i'm sure.OK!! maybe just fer target practice!!or ta check the firin range or somethin.can she actually have children!?that's scary!!(interject jaws music)!! :eek: :eek: :p

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,457

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Ann Coulter forgets that the democratic freedom of Iraqis comes at more than just the cost of 2000 American lives, but the uncounted and censored Iraqi civilian casualties. It is sad to assume that you can invade a country on bad intelligence, and then get away with murder by saying: "Well, at least they can vote."

    Shame on you.

    If you wish to support the war in Iraq, you must first compare how many Iraqis have been killed in the last three years, and then how many have been killed under Saddam's rule. Without comparing the two, you're just a "patriotic" idiot. I'm sorry, but you just are.

    As well, when you look at the death toll in Africa from child starvation alone, you'll realize that Saddam's WMDs were nothing compared to grave yard that continent has become. Even a small fraction could have went their way, but in the end, saving lives is not what this is really about. And that is why you will always have difficulty, opposition, and massive debt.


    - Ronald

  6. #6
    umdkook Guest

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald
    Ann Coulter forgets that the democratic freedom of Iraqis comes at more than just the cost of 2000 American lives, but the uncounted and censored Iraqi civilian casualties. It is sad to assume that you can invade a country on bad intelligence, and then get away with murder by saying: "Well, at least they can vote."

    Shame on you.

    If you wish to support the war in Iraq, you must first compare how many Iraqis have been killed in the last three years, and then how many have been killed under Saddam's rule. Without comparing the two, you're just a "patriotic" idiot. I'm sorry, but you just are.

    As well, when you look at the death toll in Africa from child starvation alone, you'll realize that Saddam's WMDs were nothing compared to grave yard that continent has become. Even a small fraction could have went their way, but in the end, saving lives is not what this is really about. And that is why you will always have difficulty, opposition, and massive debt.


    - Ronald
    sing it Ronald...!!!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    23

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Coulter is always funny and usually right on with her analysis. Nthing in this column is untrue.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARGER
    Coulter is always funny and usually right on with her analysis. Nthing in this column is untrue.
    says you!! ..and dont get cher hopes up!!she's definately a self satisfyin(vibrator?)type if ya ask me!!ok.so ya didn't ask!!sorry to be the bubble burster!!i get no pleasure out of it if that helps!!:eek: :p :D
    Last edited by lexx; 11-25-2005 at 09:00 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,553

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Did I miss something??

    I seem to recall the vote in the house was on the Republican proposal for immediate and complete troop withdrawl. A proposal forced to a vote simply as a political ploy since most military experts and both parties feel such a move would be a disaster. It was a 'counter' to Murtha's proposal.

    I don't believe it was Murtha's proposal that was voted on.

    cheers,
    Paul

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    432

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARGER
    NEW IDEA FOR ABORTION PARTY: AID THE ENEMY
    November 23, 2005


    In the Iraq war so far, the U.S. military has deposed a dictator who had already used weapons of mass destruction and would have used them again. As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger.

    Saddam is on trial. His psychopath sons are dead. We've captured or killed scores of foreign terrorists in Baghdad. Rape rooms and torture chambers are back in R. Kelly's Miami Beach mansion where they belong.

    The Iraqi people have voted in two free, democratic elections this year. In a rash and unconsidered move, they even gave women the right to vote.

    Iraqis have ratified a constitution and will vote for a National Assembly next month. The long-suffering Kurds are free and no longer require 24/7 protection by U.S. fighter jets.

    Libya's Moammar Gadhafi has voluntarily dismantled his weapons of mass destruction, Syria has withdrawn from Lebanon, and the Palestinians are holding elections.

    (Last but certainly not least, the Marsh Arabs' wetlands ecosystem in central Iraq that Saddam drained is being restored, so even the Democrats' war goals in Iraq are being met.)

    The American military has accomplished all this with just over 2,000 deaths. These deaths are especially painful because they fall on our greatest Americans. Still, look at what the military has done and compare the cost to 600,000 deaths in the Civil War, 400,000 deaths in World War II and 60,000 deaths in Vietnam (before Walter Cronkite finally threw in the towel and declared victory for North Vietnam).

    What is known as a "hawk" in today's Democratic Party looks at what our military has accomplished and — during the war, while our troops are in harm's way — demands that we withdraw our troops.

    In an upbeat speech now being aired repeatedly on al-Jazeera, last week Rep. John Murtha said U.S. troops "cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home." Claiming the war is "a flawed policy wrapped in illusion," Murtha said the "American public is way ahead of us."

    Fed up with being endlessly told "the American people" have turned against the war in Iraq, Republicans asked the Democrats to show what they had in their hand and vote on a resolution to withdraw the troops.

    By a vote of 403-3, the House of Representatives wasn't willing to bet that "the American people" want to pull out of Iraq. (This vote also marked the first time in recent history that the Democrats did not respond to getting their butts kicked by demanding a recount.)

    The vote is all the more shocking because of what it says about the Democrats' motives in attacking the war — as well as alerting us to three members of Congress we really need to keep an eye on.

    It is simply a fact that Democrats like Murtha are encouraging the Iraqi insurgents when they say the war is going badly and it's time to bring the troops home. Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal — or "redeployment," as liberals pointlessly distinguish — will delay our inevitable victory and cost more American lives.

    Anti-war protests in the U.S. during the Vietnam War were a major source of moral support to the enemy. We know that not only from simple common sense, but from the statements of former North Vietnamese military leaders who evidently didn't get the memo telling them not to say so. In an Aug. 3, 1995, interview in The Wall Street Journal, Bui Tin, a former colonel in the North Vietnamese army, called the American peace movement "essential" to the North Vietnamese victory.

    "Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American anti-war movement," he said. "Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses."

    What are we to make of the fact that — as we now know — the Democrats don't even want to withdraw troops from Iraq? By their own account, there is no merit to their demands. Before the vote, Democrats could at least defend themselves from sedition by pleading stupidity. Now we know they don't believe what they are saying about the war. (Thanks to that vote, the Islamo-fascists know it, too.)

    The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.

    They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.

    COPYRIGHT 2005 ANN COULTER
    Where did Iraq get those Chemical Weapons that were used to kill the Kurds???

    Coulter has selective memory and could care less how many American soldiers die so long as there is a neocon in the White House her world is all bright and happy.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald
    Ann Coulter forgets that the democratic freedom of Iraqis comes at more than just the cost of 2000 American lives, but the uncounted and censored Iraqi civilian casualties. It is sad to assume that you can invade a country on bad intelligence, and then get away with murder by saying: "Well, at least they can vote."

    Shame on you.

    If you wish to support the war in Iraq, you must first compare how many Iraqis have been killed in the last three years, and then how many have been killed under Saddam's rule. Without comparing the two, you're just a "patriotic" idiot. I'm sorry, but you just are.

    As well, when you look at the death toll in Africa from child starvation alone, you'll realize that Saddam's WMDs were nothing compared to grave yard that continent has become. Even a small fraction could have went their way, but in the end, saving lives is not what this is really about. And that is why you will always have difficulty, opposition, and massive debt.


    - Ronald

    Well said Ronald!

    LM

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    12,866

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulM
    Did I miss something??

    I seem to recall the vote in the house was on the Republican proposal for immediate and complete troop withdrawl. A proposal forced to a vote simply as a political ploy since most military experts and both parties feel such a move would be a disaster. It was a 'counter' to Murtha's proposal.

    I don't believe it was Murtha's proposal that was voted on.

    cheers,
    Paul

    It wasn't Murtha's proposal that was voted on, it was the Republican proposal but apparently not only is Charger uninformed, his "news" sources are equally uninformed. LOL.

    Lady Mod

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    14,663

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by sojustask
    It wasn't Murtha's proposal that was voted on, it was the Republican proposal but apparently not only is Charger uninformed, his "news" sources are equally uninformed. LOL.

    Lady Mod
    Yeah..that's some "News" source. That's like calling Baghdad Bob a news source. ..except even he had more credibility that AnnThrax Coulter. She's even been canned from a number of virulently biased right-wing propaganda rags since even they were appalled and mortified by her brand of particularly vile, sleazy smear-meistering, delusional lies and loony right-wing fairytales.

    The frightening thing is that there are actually some ( perhaps as many as 35%) who are still willing to ignore all the labels and drink from their toxic chalice of GOP Kool Aid everyday and be uncontrollably driven to read, let alone post, that kind of pathetic, retarded drivel. It's too bad there's no detox program for right-wing degenerates like this.
    Last edited by dchristie; 11-25-2005 at 06:48 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    82

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by sojustask
    It wasn't Murtha's proposal that was voted on, it was the Republican proposal but apparently not only is Charger uninformed, his "news" sources are equally uninformed. LOL.

    Lady Mod

    The Democratic 'only time they didn't demand a recount' jab is also retarded since the Dems DELIBERATELY voted almost unanimously against the ridiculous proposal out of protest for the Republican sideshow stunt that it was.

    I always have to laugh whenever I see the rabid right quote one of their equally rabid and over the top fringe fruitcakes and demand that its proof that their opinion is the correct one.

    Get a life whoever you are CHARGER.
    Last edited by HG_1301; 11-25-2005 at 07:10 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    23

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by HG_1301
    The Democratic 'only time they didn't demand a recount' jab is also retarded since the Dems DELIBERATELY voted almost unanimously against the ridiculous proposal out of protest for the Republican sideshow stunt that it was.

    I always have to laugh whenever I see the rabid right quote one of their equally rabid and over the top fringe fruitcakes and demand that its proof that their opinion is the correct one.

    Get a life whoever you are CHARGER.

    Fruitcake, get a life? Who are you? You sound proud that Dems lied about what they thought on iraq. Why would they do that? The rabid ones arund here are not on the right. Check it out.

    Everything Coulter says here is true. Splitting hairs about the motion is pathetic...it was Murthas proposal and the Republicans motion.
    Last edited by CHARGER; 11-25-2005 at 10:43 PM.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    633

    Re: New Idea For Abortion Party: Aid The Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARGER
    Fruitcake, get a life? Who are you? You sound proud that Dems lied about what they thought on iraq. Why would they do that? The rabid ones arund here are not on the right. Check it out.

    Everything Coulter says here is true. Splitting hairs about the motion is pathetic...it was Murthas proposal and the Republicans motion.
    To be fair CHARGER, the lefties here are correct in the vote was not on the Murtha purposal has he spoke it.

    At the same time, we all know there is not going to be an "Immediate" withdraw of troops even when we begin to reposition our forces. The point the republicans made was that withdraw at this time is not a viable option and the democrats know it. Had the motion been to withdraw troops in six months, the democrats would have still voted the way they did.

    Few politicians are going to stand up and say with a vote that we will have our troops out of Iraq by a certian date within the next 6 months. What has been taking place is the democrats are trying to position themselves for the next election cycle and feel the American people want us out of Iraq right away. I don't believe they are right and the vote showed they didn't believe they where right either.
    Last edited by RegulationE; 11-26-2005 at 12:09 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Republican Party = Rainbow Party
    By conserv4ever in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-05-2015, 06:13 PM
  2. Democrat Party Hack Comes Clean About the Tea Party
    By conserv4ever in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-02-2015, 06:15 AM
  3. Democrats to Party Hard at Abortion Clinic
    By pwrone in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 12-05-2011, 12:14 PM
  4. Tea Party Protesting ... Own Tea Party Rally
    By naturefreak2101 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-31-2011, 06:18 PM
  5. Replies: 37
    Last Post: 01-22-2006, 11:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Add / Edit Tags
000, abortion, accepted, accomplished, account, acknowledge, add, administration, advanced, advisors, africa, age, aid, america, american, ann, another, anti, appears, army, article, assembly, association, attacking, attempt, attorney general, aug, away, back, bad, baghdad, based, bat, bay, beach, best, bet, better, brain, brand, bright, bring, bull, bur, busy, butts, cake, called, calling, cannot, captured, care, case, censored, central, cer, chambers, check, checking, cher, child, children, civil, civilian, claim, claiming, clark, cli, clinto, clinton’s, close, closed, colonel, com, coma, common, compare, complete, completely, con, condi, conservatives, continue, correct, cost, counter, country, cover, crap, credibility, credit, creme, cspan, current, cycle, date, day, days, dea, dead, death, deaths, debt, declared, defend, delusional, delusions, demand, demanding, democrat, democratic, democrats, dems, des, desert, desperate, destruction, did, didn, different, differently, dim, ding, disaster, doesn, don, dont, dow, drink, duck, earth, easy, eed, effect, elaborate, electio, embedded, eme, enemy, entire, essential, exercise, experts, expose, eye, eyes, face, faced, factual, fail, failed, fair, fall, false, farce, fathers, fed, fee, feel, felons, fla, flat, folks, fool, forces, fox, freedom, frequent, fringe, fruitcake, future, gave, geek, general, george, george soros, getting, giving, gordo, great, greatest, grim, ground, group, groups, grow, growth, guy, had, hand, hannity, hat, heard, hell, help, helps, hey, him, his, holding, hose, house, huma, human, hurt, hussein, ial, ice, idea, idiot, ignore, ile, ill, ime, indicted, intelligence, interview, invade, investigations, ion, its, jean, jerry, job, john, jour, just, kelly, kennedy, kicked, killed, kind, korea, last, laugh, laundering, leaders, leading, leads, liberals, libya, lied, likes, limbaugh, line, listen, lives, living, lol, long, longer, lot, lying, mainstream, make, makes, making, man., many, mass, massive, matter, mea, member, members, memory, messenger, micheal, mind, ministers, monger, monkeys, month, moon, moore, moral, more, motives, move, movemen, movement, murder, music, nam, nasa, national, need, needed, net, nice, niger, north, now, npr, nutcase, ones, onli, only, palestinians, par, part, party, pas, passed, pathetic, peace, person, personal, photos, piece, place, plans, player, pleasure, ploy, point, policy, poor, pos, positive, post, posted, posters, posting, presiden, presidency, productive, professional, proposal, proposition, protection, prove, public, pull, question, questions, quickly, quote, race, rally, ran, rape, rated, raw, read, reality, reason, recount, red, refuses, respect, respond, response, rest, retarded, ridiculous, rio, role, rooms, rove, row, rule, sad, scary, science, script, seem, sense, serve, sho, shocking, shot, showed, shows, sides, simple, simply, site, small, soldiers, sons, soo, soros, sorry, source, sources, speaker, speaks, split, star, start, state, stated, stop, stories, story, stream, street, stunt, stupid, such, sul, support, supporting, surge, systems, take, taken, takes, taking, tal, talking, target, ted, terrorist, the, the wall, themselves, they, thing, thinks, this, thought, threw, time, times, today, told, tom, top, toxic, trap, treason, tries, troops, turned, twin, undeniable, uni, uranium, url, vaild, victory, view, vile, vote, voted, voting, wall, wanted, war, waste, watched, week, were, win, witch, withdraw, woma, woman, wome, won, wonderful, working, worth, writes, wrong, year, years, your

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •