+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 1 of 1

  1. #1

    MUST HAVE Pope Benedict 89 v cherry on top of the cake Bush Sr 92 & Obama v GW v Hitlery C

    Sep 20 2016, just before the BIG BANG:
    George H.W. Bush to Vote for Hillary Clinton - the cherry on top of the cake
    The 92-year-old Republican 41st president and member of a conservative political dynasty that spans several generations will vote against his party, or so says the scion of another family at the center of American politics.

    Bush Sr at 92 beats Ratzinger at 89
    Bush Sr who is now 92 and was replaced as POTUS by Bill Clinton in 1992, beats Ratzinger, who is now 89 and still playing pope, as ultimate example for "lived long enough to fulfill their roles". Yet ...

    Only Ratzinger still alive is a MUST for completely fulfilling the original 1993 BIG BANG script.
    In other words: "Sep 2016: George H.W. Bush to Vote for Hillary Clinton" is just the cherry on top of the cake.

    ---- Reminder:
    MUST HAVE Pope Benedict 89 v [cherry on top of the cake] Bush Sr 92 & Obama v GW Bush v Hillary Clinton: BIG BANG 93 script

    The original 1993 BIG BANG script is still unfolding, with only two words changed, and that happened already in Oct 2008.
    Transcript of its last two lines:
    The first german pope, one of the last survivors of Hitler's army, proclaimed the only real pope since he was elected.
    Hillary Clinton proclaimed the real 44th president since 2008, sucessor of GW Bush, ensuring an uninterrupted BushClinton presidency since 1988 to terminate the USA.

    Obama and Bush Sr v GW Bush v Hitlery Clinton v Ratzinger
    How tight were these actors coupled with their roles as the BIG BANG script was launched, Dec 1993.

    Obama and Bush Sr
    The Abomination of Desolation, alias the "Obamessiah of the Obama-nation of Desolation", is THE leading role of the BIG BANG script.
    In other words: the role was already named OBAMA when the BIG BANG script was launched, Dec 1993, as the ethnic indonesian actor casted for the role first made headlines as Osama.
    Same goes for "the first of the BushClintons", a role that George Bush Sr started to play in 1988.

    GW Bush
    "The next Bush of the BushClintons": meant for GW Bush with "Jeb" as alternative.

    Hitlery Clinton
    "Hitler's daughter, the last of the BushClintons as the terminator of the USA": only Hillary Clinton could play the role, as explanaid in Merkel article (BASICS).
    If Hillary would not be able to play the role then the first alternative would be her only brother, known as Kevin Spacey.
    This would mean that the role would have to be stripped of "BushClinton" and renamed to "Hitler's son, the terminator of the House of Cards USA".

    See "1993: All actors originally casted lived long enough to fulfill their roles" in "Original 1993 BIG BANG script still unfolding".

    Hillary's only sister (different mothers) had already stepped on stage in 1991 (from unknown to Minister for Women and Youth in one year).
    Illuminati can create new identities at will but Merkel would not be able to impersonate a native US american citizen, having lived almost always in Germany (West not East).
    There was never any need to have Merkel speak as an american to eventually play "terminator of the USA" because she was assigned from the beginning another role: "first woman chancellor of Germany, leader of the EU".
    NO actress plays Angela Merkel's mother, Gretl Braun alias Herlind Kasner: WHY exposed worldwide first
    Last edited by TruthIsNeverTooHorrible; 09-20-2016 at 07:28 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-11-2013, 01:11 PM
  2. Is Pope Benedict Secretly a Satanist?
    By rogerbovee in forum Religious Scams
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-15-2011, 06:21 PM
  3. What Pope Benedict Must Do
    By pwrone in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-17-2010, 03:21 PM
  4. Pope Benedict Calls For New World Order
    By rogerbovee in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 11:31 PM
  5. Why did Pope Benedict utter these words in public? And why now?
    By Americanadian in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-29-2006, 07:46 AM

Tags for this Thread



Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts