+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 20

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    77

    Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?


    After 3 Air Force technicians, the Canadian Parliament, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich proved the American government has been spraying a barium/aluminum cocktail mist in the air for over 20 years, and the bird and bee populations of America have been reduced to half of the 1990 levels, and lung cancer rates have shot up in humans by 15%-20% (despite fewer smokers) should we confront the military about this crap and ask the candidates to debate why Evergreen Air should be allowed to continue the flights? http://www.truehealthfacts.com/chemtrail-page.html and http://www.chemtrailfacts.com/

    Last edited by Solicitor Scams; 07-31-2016 at 10:38 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    that is a weird picture i wonder if its some kinda cloud seeding experiment to produce rain for agricultural drought areas!?
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,232

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    Quote Originally Posted by lexx View Post
    that is a weird picture i wonder if its some kinda cloud seeding experiment to produce rain for agricultural drought areas!?
    The picture with all the tanks is from a Boeing 777 test aircraft.
    What you see is ballast tanks filled with water, used to simulate passenger and cargo loads during test flights. The water can pumped between the tanks to simulate various load patterns during flight.

    If you look closely at the picture, you will see the text "Hazmat inside" on a wall. That text is Photoshopped, probably by some chemtrail conspiracy nut.
    The original picture, without the text can be found here, together with other pictures from the same aircraft:

    https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-ch...-barrels.t661/

    You can also see a quite interesting video clip, with Boeing Test Director Scott Peterson explaining how this test rig works!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    yah reminds me of the frankenstein curse on science!! the village idiots are always around to make rumors into nightmares and come in the night with pitchforks and torches to run the evil scientists outa town!?
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,510

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    I thought those things had reflective traits to help lower the temperature. There's a bunch of cities where they do this and many people get sick

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    these same group of public fear instigators here at scams do noting but post B S counting on the ignorance of the masses to promote their own sense of importance!! kinda like trump!!
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,232

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    Quote Originally Posted by Administrator View Post
    I thought those things had reflective traits to help lower the temperature. There's a bunch of cities where they do this and many people get sick
    Water tanks in aircrafts make people sick?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Stow, OH SOL III
    Posts
    3,231

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whether they should be stopped?

    https://www.metabunk.org/transparent...-trails.t1350/

    The plane in pics A & C is an Airbus from the Emirates airline fleet.
    http://www.emirates.com/us/english/
    Must be then damn Muslims.
    LoL.
    Last edited by nomaxim; 08-01-2016 at 04:34 PM.
    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. -C. Darwin

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    257

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    People on this site only look at photos and headlines/titles. Posting links to well documented articles and sworn statements/confessions of former Evergreen pilots and technicians go to waste. http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...cts-with-usaf/ For the lazy s out there I post these videos. When someone you love gets lung cancer and they don't even smoke, remember these links... http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-jets/

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Stow, OH SOL III
    Posts
    3,231

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    greenpeace.org.uk/blog/other/greenpeace%E2%80%99s-view-%E2%80%98chemtrails%E2%80%99-20150313-0;
    And at the bottom of that statement from Greenpeace.
    Nuff said.

    LoL.
    Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science. -C. Darwin

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    7

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    Oh come on. We need to stop this bullshit. Nakeke.
    They need to focus on how other american citizen more work.
    Sleeping is the best medicine in the world of tyrant.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    186

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    Quote Originally Posted by Solicitor Scams View Post

    After 3 Air Force technicians, the Canadian Parliament, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich proved the American government has been spraying a barium/aluminum cocktail mist in the air for over 20 years, and the bird and bee populations of America have been reduced to half of the 1990 levels, and lung cancer rates have shot up in humans by 15%-20% (despite fewer smokers) should we confront the military about this crap and ask the candidates to debate why Evergreen Air should be allowed to continue the flights? http://www.truehealthfacts.com/chemtrail-page.html and http://www.chemtrailfacts.com/


    I is clear from those who commented so far that they already have a pre-determined position on this subject and did not bother to read your linked article. I also read the U.S. Congressional report from Congressman Dennis Kucinich and the comments of the Canadian Parliament- all of whom confirm the hazards are real. Also see;

    http://distance-healer.com/Chemtrails.html

    http://beforeitsnews.com/chemtrails/...g-2430100.html

    http://rense.com/general27/qoes.htm

    http://gizadeathstar.com/2014/05/us-...ather-control/

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    Kucinich, Chemtrails and HR 2977 – The “Space Preservation Act”
    contrails
    May
    19
    2007
    One of the more pervasive myths regarding “chemtrails” is that 2008 presidential hopeful Dennis Kuchinich tried to have them banned by an act of congress, but was pressured by the government to modify the act to remove the mention of “chemtrails”.

    So what really happened? In a nutshell, Kucinich did not write the bill (or read it, until too late), the focus of the bill is nothing to do with chemtrails, it was written by UFO enthusiasts Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin, who were trying to:

    Nullify a vast conspiracy by the “military-industrial complex”
    Allow the use of suppressed alien technology for free energy
    Avoid accidentally shooting down (or scaring away) visiting aliens.
    They listed a bunch of weird weapons, including mind control, tectonic weapons and (very briefly) chemtrails. The bill was re-written several time in less unusual language to give it chance of passing, but ultimately fizzled in committee.

    The specific act was HR 2977, the “Space Preservation Act of 2001″, the stated goal of which was:

    “To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.”

    The initial version of the act is the only one that makes mention of “exotic weapons systems”, listing several technologies that will be familiar to conspiracy theorists:

    (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
    (ii) chemtrails;
    (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
    (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
    (v) laser weapons systems;
    (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
    (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

    Yes, it even includes “extraterrestrial weapons”, meaning weapons created by aliens (or created from alien technology from crashed flying saucers at Roswell), as well as psychotronic (mind control) weapons. Yet somehow “chemtrails” gets all the attention here.

    Who wrote this? The original language for the bill was actually created by Alfred Webre and Carol Rosin. See, from Webre’s web site:

    http://www.exopolitics.com/

    With Dr. Carol S. Rosin and many others, [Webre] is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban space-based weapons.

    And also

    http://www.exopoliticsinstitute.org/...PP&M.htm#Webre

    With others, Webre is a co-architect of the Space Preservation Treaty (www.peaceinspace.org ) and the Space Preservation Act that was introduced to the U.S. Congress by Congressman Dennis Kucinich and is endorsed by over 270 NGO’s worldwide.

    Webre and Rosin started an organization called the “Institute For Cooperation In Space“, an organization whose primary purpose is to promote adoption of the Space Preservation Act. The ICIS states on its web site in part:

    Humanity is on the threshold of a quantum leap in consciousness and endeavor.We must now take action to preserve this grand opportunity by preventing the weaponization of space.

    We have a critical choice – to explore the great unknown of outer space or to risk continued suffering and disasters, devastation or obliteration. We can rise above different perspectives and actions that didn’t, don’t, and won’t cause second order change, actions that recognize our high consciousness and human potential applied with out-of-the-box thinking and intention to cause second order change, or we can continue the status quo of protesting the old and accepting the same that would only lead us to more violence instead of peace.

    The whole site has a very “new-age” feel to it. Seemingly if only this act is passed, the military-industrial complex will turn from its warlike ways, and humanity will enter a new age of cooperation, progress and raised consciousness. The rationale for a weapons ban is never clearly explained. Nor is it explained why having weapons in space will prevent normal research and exploration of space. Obviously we would all like to see less deadly weapons floating over our heads, but is a total ban vital to the next stage of human evolution? ICIS seems to think so.

    Indeed, when you talk about things in simple terms, an “international ban on weapons in space” sounds like a great idea. Like a ban on chemical weapons, it saves money and makes the world a safer place. So it’s not hard to get people to support such a ban.

    The more well-known face of the ICIS, is Carol Rosin. Rosin claims that in 1974 rocket scientist Werner Von Braun told her “Carol, you will stop the weaponization of space”, and described to her a vast conspiracy by the military-industrial complex to raise a series of fears to justify space-based weapons. Since then, Rosin has dedicated her life to exposing this conspiracy, and allowing humanity to expand it’s consciousness into space. Here’s a video of her explaining this.

    The video shows Rosin speaking at “The Disclosure Project“, an organization working to “disclose the facts about UFOs, extraterrestrial intelligence, and classified advanced energy and propulsion systems.” Rosin herself only briefly touches on this in her speech, but it is clear she believes that the government has alien technology, and is withholding it from the people.The other board members on the ICIS are co-founder Alfred Webre, Brian O’Leary and Daniel Sheehan, all of whom are deeply involved with The Disclosure Project.

    Rosin commented on the “chemtrail” changes in the Bill here:

    http://www.nwbotanicals.org/mediawatch/kucinich.htm (http://archive.is/Q038l)

    Comment
    From Carol Rosin
    [email protected]
    1-28-2

    Perhaps I can help correct some fuzzy information that is being spread about H.R.3616, the Space Preservation Act of 2002, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich.

    This bill will only ban space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit. It is NOT a bill to ban chemtrails and/or psychotronics or mind control devises or any specific weapons listed in the category of definitions in the original bill.

    I’m not sure where that rumor started, but in any case, those definitional were only listed on the original bill for definitional purposes…to exemplify what space-based weapons might be deployed in space if the space-based weapons bill isn’t passed. Frequently bills are revised, and things like definitions are removed. No big deal. The legislation is in no way compromised. This Congressman and his legislation maintain their integrity and commitment to ban space-based weapons. It was never a bill to ban chemtrails or mind control technologies.

    So what’s Kucinich’s involvement in this? It’s difficult to say. Kucinich is anti-war, so perhaps that’s his motivation. He does have a lot of new-age, UFO-believing, friends, but he’s also running for president. When he was made aware of the nature of the “exotic weapons” language in the bill, it was re-written, and when questioned about it, he said

    “I’m not into that. Understand me. When I found out that was in there, I said, ‘Look, I’m not interested in going there.'”

    Kucinich’s motivations are perhaps revealed by his speech to the house on May 18th, 2005, introducing a newer version of the bill:

    “What has happened to our country? Why are we projecting fear and paranoia to such heights? Have we so lost our way and our faith that we are prepared to transform the heavens into hell? If the kingdom and the will of God is to be done on earth as it is in heaven, what is to happen when the United States takes nuclear fire up to the gates of heaven?
    “Such an offense against humanity could bring the wrath of God upon this nation.”

    So Kucinich thinks that space based weapons will offend God, since space is close to heaven, and if you put nuclear weapons near heaven then God will be offended and bring his wrath against us.

    If you actually ARE a conspiracy theorist, then all this will come as little surprise to you. You will already believe the government is covering up technology based on crashed UFOs. Yet HR2977 is constantly being mentioned solely to make the case that “chemtrails” are something the government is aware of. The reality is that they were simply given a passing mention in bill written by new-age UFO conspiracy theorists and sponsored by an eccentric politician, all of who believe in things that are far more unusual than “chemtrails”.
    Last edited by lexx; 08-03-2016 at 11:34 AM.
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    27,212

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    oh and i also wanted to comment that THIS BELONGS IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES NOT POLITICS!!why!? because with all the intelligent people in GOV, NO ONE IS AWARE of ANY SUCH THING!!!!
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    186

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    Quote Originally Posted by Antibiotic View Post
    People on this site only look at photos and headlines/titles. Posting links to well documented articles and sworn statements/confessions of former Evergreen pilots and technicians go to waste. http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...cts-with-usaf/ For the lazy s out there I post these videos. When someone you love gets lung cancer and they don't even smoke, remember these links... http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-jets/

    You are right on target with these links.I think this lex guy may be a govt. shill

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    898

    Re: Should Trump, Hillary, and Jill Stein debate the health risks of chemtrails and whethe

    Quote Originally Posted by nomaxim View Post
    https://www.metabunk.org/transparent...-trails.t1350/

    The plane in pics A & C is an Airbus from the Emirates airline fleet.
    http://www.emirates.com/us/english/
    Must be then damn Muslims.
    LoL.
    That was funny. I mean the part about these rejects from the 7th century being able to fly.
    Lose a pound a day, every day. I personally lost 60 pounds in 60 days. My free 47 page PDF eBook explains how. CLICK HERE to read online, or download your free copy.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-24-2016, 12:10 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-24-2016, 03:12 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-22-2016, 10:42 AM
  4. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-29-2016, 06:14 PM
  5. Green Party candidate Jill Stein A Muslim !!!!!!!
    By Yawn... in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-13-2012, 03:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •