+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Gary Mack

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    Gary Mack

    Gary Mack is a TURNCOAT! He runs the Sixth Floor Depository Museum and defuses conspiracy theories every day. This was filmed when Gary was trying to make a name for himself.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u56m2m3eH0

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    604

    Re: Gary Mack

    How about this one?

    They say the driver did it point blank...sure looks that way doesn't it?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5cCzDbtVnM



    Quote Originally Posted by theme View Post
    Gary Mack is a TURNCOAT! He runs the Sixth Floor Depository Museum and defuses conspiracy theories every day. This was filmed when Gary was trying to make a name for himself.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9u56m2m3eH0

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    Re: Gary Mack

    No. I don't believe Greer shot Kennedy. He killed him, nevertheless, by slowing the car down to a near halt though. Kellerman in the front seat also enabled the murder by doing nothing. After all , he was a Secret Service Agent , not a potted plant. His job was to protect the president. That is what he does and he has the highest of standards when it comes to negligence.

    Notions that Greer shot Kennedy or the picture "wink" only serve to discredit all evidence bringing forth the truth.

    So while it may look like Greer shot a gun, this version had to be doctored to appear so. Do you really think Mrs. Kennedy or even the Connellies would have let that one go?

    Greer didn't need to shoot Kennedy. He only needed to stop the car until the deed was done.

    There were plenty of shooter in Dealy plaza and as you know, Connely was hit too so other shots had to come from somewhere else to do that damage.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    604

    Re: Gary Mack

    How many of the Secret Service were in on this?

    Can't we the People file a complaint and have a Judge open the case and look into it?

    The orders came from above, right?

    Quote Originally Posted by theme View Post
    No. I don't believe Greer shot Kennedy. He killed him, nevertheless, by slowing the car down to a near halt though. Kellerman in the front seat also enabled the murder by doing nothing. After all , he was a Secret Service Agent , not a potted plant. His job was to protect the president. That is what he does and he has the highest of standards when it comes to negligence.

    Notions that Greer shot Kennedy or the picture "wink" only serve to discredit all evidence bringing forth the truth.

    So while it may look like Greer shot a gun, this version had to be doctored to appear so. Do you really think Mrs. Kennedy or even the Connellies would have let that one go?

    Greer didn't need to shoot Kennedy. He only needed to stop the car until the deed was done.

    There were plenty of shooter in Dealy plaza and as you know, Connely was hit too so other shots had to come from somewhere else to do that damage.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    Re: Gary Mack

    Greer and Kellerman had to be in on it and their superviser was Emory Roberts.

    Kellerman , by the way, was the Agent who would not let JFK's body remain in Dallas for his autopsy. Dallas had jurisdiction at that time, and that is just one more crime that Kellerman committed that day.


    The coroner in Dallas explained that "Kellerman was a big man and had an automatic weapon..and I am sure he would have ran me over or shot me had I not got out of the way."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    Re: Gary Mack

    Discovery Channel

    Anything that appears on a television network about this subject has to support the official fairy tale. Other than the wonderful "The Men Who Killed The President" series, everything that has appeared on television about the assassination, since the moment Oswald was killed, has been a clear and obvious part of the coverup.

    We are now 45 years removed from this event. What possible reason does someone producing a documentary about the JFK assassination have, at this point, to continue distorting the truth? For those of you who don't think there was a massive conspiracy, with the most powerful forces in the world behind it, how do you explain this continuing adherence to an account that any average first grader could see was impossible? The people writing and producing this stuff were either not born in 1963, or very small. Unlike the Tom Wickers and Dan Rathers of the journalism world, they shouldn't have an axe to grind here- they aren't merely covering up their own woefully inadequate performance in covering the crime of the century. Obviously, the powerful forces behind JFK's death still exist, or otherwise there would be no purpose behind the continuing coverup. I don't think the Discovery Channel is producing this sort of unbelievable nonsense in order to protect some long dead anti-Castro or renegade CIA elements.

    The tact of using "technology" in order to sway those unknowledgable about the facts in this case, began in earnest on a "NOVA" PBS special back in the late 1980s. Walter Cronkite was trotted out one more time to lie about the assassination, and we were assured that the then new computer graphics could easily prove that such things as the single-bullet theory were possible. Since then, the likes of Dale Myers have used convoluted "technology" and seemingly impressive graphics to prop up the worn out, absurd Warren Commission fairy tale.

    There is no independent press in this country outside of the internet. When it comes to subjects like the JFK assassination, there is no "left" or "right." Everyone with a public platform (congressmen, reporters, producers) agree that there was no conspiracy.

Similar Threads

  1. Mack Zidan & Adrian Morrison
    By Piccolo in forum Mail Order Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2013, 02:24 PM
  2. Gary Mack on the fake Secret Agents
    By theme in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 07-05-2010, 02:58 AM
  3. Connie Mack = Idiot.
    By danrush1966 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2010, 04:42 PM
  4. Mack The Knife
    By lexx in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-21-2010, 05:38 AM
  5. Gary Mack
    By eflteacher in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-24-2008, 06:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •