+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 16 of 50

Thread: War on Terror

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    714

    War on Terror

    We all know that the battle in Iraq has at times gone badly, but being that it is just part of the war on terror, what should we do next? Is running away from Iraq the answer? Does anyone here doubt that we are at war with Islamic Facist? I support the battle in Iraq because alot of the bad guys are there dying instead of here in the U.S killing us. What do Liberals/Democrats suggest we do? :confused:
    "If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you always got"

    National Taxes, National Borders!!

    NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,548

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronster
    We all know that the battle in Iraq has at times gone badly, but being that it is just part of the war on terror, what should we do next? Is running away from Iraq the answer? Does anyone here doubt that we are at war with Islamic Facist? I support the battle in Iraq because alot of the bad guys are there dying instead of here in the U.S killing us. What do Liberals/Democrats suggest we do? :confused:

    I'm with you ron. In vietnam the vc didn't follow us home. Not sure what's next.

  3. #3
    TheWorker Guest

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronster
    We all know that the battle in Iraq has at times gone badly, but being that it is just part of the war on terror, what should we do next? Is running away from Iraq the answer? Does anyone here doubt that we are at war with Islamic Facist? I support the battle in Iraq because alot of the bad guys are there dying instead of here in the U.S killing us. What do Liberals/Democrats suggest we do? :confused:
    what bad guys, our own troops??? im not kidding here, what did iraq have to do with our "war on terror"??? i know its been asked so many times but for real, what did it have to do with the "war on terror"...

    the impetus for war was based on UN resolutions and WMD guidelines that Saddam wasnt following, but it was never about "the war on terror"...the iraqis werent affecting us, we all know saddam had a tight grip on his own people.

  4. #4
    TheWorker Guest

    Re: War on Terror

    i dont think we should "run away" either, and not becuase then teh bad guys win, because then we really will have no support anywhere ever from anyone. we screwed that country up bad, to leave now will be horrible for us.

    yet our troops die everyday and the iraqis dont seem to give two ****es about democracy and freedom from terrorism...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,578

    Re: War on Terror

    Since the ball seems to be in our court and we need to be the ones to initiate some sort of settlement, the first order of business would be....

    All financial aid to Israel will cease until all Israeli settlements and military outposts withdraw from Arab land to within the borders set out in 1947.

    Any State that condones, finances, or supports terrorism will be considered a Terrorist State. Any attack against any American interests worldwide by that Terrorist State will be considered an act of War. It's high time Arab countries started looking after their own internal problems.

    A Terrorist will be considered an enemy combatant and will be subject to all the provisions of the Geneva Conventions including the right to a fair trial, and shall receive the Penalty of Death if convicted.

    That should be enough to get the left all worked up.



  6. #6
    TheWorker Guest

    Re: War on Terror

    im curious as to why you think if israel withdrew to 1947 borders anything would be accomplished. they were within their own borders to begin with, and that didnt stop the arabs from invading israel....right???

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    mighigan
    Posts
    384

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronster
    We all know that the battle in Iraq has at times gone badly, but being that it is just part of the war on terror, what should we do next? Is running away from Iraq the answer? Does anyone here doubt that we are at war with Islamic Facist? I support the battle in Iraq because alot of the bad guys are there dying instead of here in the U.S killing us. What do Liberals/Democrats suggest we do? :confused:
    Its ok to fight the war on terror in some other civilians back yard just not yours or some other Americans?
    My suggestion is that we leave these people alone and stay the h-e-double hockey sticks out of other peoples affairs.
    Meddling with things we do not even attempt to understand is exactly what got us into the messes with Sadam and Osama in the first place.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,578

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by TheWorker
    im curious as to why you think if israel withdrew to 1947 borders anything would be accomplished. they were within their own borders to begin with, and that didnt stop the arabs from invading israel....right???
    You seem quick to judge, but I see you never offered your position. Is that because you don't have a position?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,548

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by UserName
    Since the ball seems to be in our court and we need to be the ones to initiate some sort of settlement, the first order of business would be....

    All financial aid to Israel will cease until all Israeli settlements and military outposts withdraw from Arab land to within the borders set out in 1947.

    Any State that condones, finances, or supports terrorism will be considered a Terrorist State. Any attack against any American interests worldwide by that Terrorist State will be considered an act of War. It's high time Arab countries started looking after their own internal problems.

    A Terrorist will be considered an enemy combatant and will be subject to all the provisions of the Geneva Conventions including the right to a fair trial, and shall receive the Penalty of Death if convicted.

    That should be enough to get the left all worked up.


    Isreal has a right to defend itself and pulling back to the 47 borders would enable it's sworn enemies to reoccupy and arm the territory involved.

    You're correct about what should constitute a terrorist state and how we should react to any attacks against us and our allies.

    The geneva convention specifically eliminates terrorists as combatants and therefore affords them no protection.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    714

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by Indie
    Its ok to fight the war on terror in some other civilians back yard just not yours or some other Americans?
    My suggestion is that we leave these people alone and stay the h-e-double hockey sticks out of other peoples affairs.
    Meddling with things we do not even attempt to understand is exactly what got us into the messes with Sadam and Osama in the first place.

    Well, they did not leave us alone, did they. And as far as invading Iraq in the first place Sadam was asking for it. Wether or not weapons of mass destruction were found, he was playing coy with the U.S and the U.N the whole time. Letting inspectors in, kicking them out, letting them in, kicking them out. After 9/11 America could NOT just sit by and wait to be attacked again.

    I dont disagree with why we went to Iraq, just what we did once we finished the intial attack. You dont leave people alone that dont LEAVE YOU ALONE.
    "If you always do what you've always done, you'll always get what you always got"

    National Taxes, National Borders!!

    NO AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,578

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by bogie
    Isreal has a right to defend itself and pulling back to the 47 borders would enable it's sworn enemies to reoccupy and arm the territory involved.
    So you suggest we negotiate the status quo? That's hilarious! :D

    Quote Originally Posted by bogie
    You're correct about what should constitute a terrorist state and how we should react to any attacks against us and our allies.

    The geneva convention specifically eliminates terrorists as combatants and therefore affords them no protection.
    By declaring war on the terrorist state all combatants are considered enemy soldiers. The Geneva Conventions apply.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,548

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by UserName
    So you suggest we negotiate the status quo? That's hilarious! :D


    By declaring war on the terrorist state all combatants are considered enemy soldiers. The Geneva Conventions apply.
    Where did I suggest negotiating anything?

    Only uniformed members of an organized militia are considered combatants and thereby protected.
    Last edited by bogie; 12-20-2006 at 12:56 AM.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,578

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by bogie
    Where did I suggest negotiating anything?
    So you just want to leave it as it is???? :confused:
    That certainly sounds like the typical Republican answer... stick your head in the sand and maybe it will just go away by itself. :rolleyes:

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,548

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by UserName
    So you just want to leave it as it is???? :confused:
    That certainly sounds like the typical Republican answer... stick your head in the sand and maybe it will just go away by itself. :rolleyes:
    You think I'm a republican? :D

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,548

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by UserName
    So you just want to leave it as it is???? :confused:
    That certainly sounds like the typical Republican answer... stick your head in the sand and maybe it will just go away by itself. :rolleyes:
    It definitly will not go away. That's why we support Isreal.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,578

    Re: War on Terror

    Quote Originally Posted by bogie
    Only uniformed members of an organized militia are considered combatants and thereby protected.
    And you consider these Terrorists as unorganized and naked?


    "Convention I offers protections to wounded combatants, who are defined as members of the armed forces of a party to an international conflict, members of militias or volunteer corps including members of organized resistance movements as long as they have a well-defined chain of command, are clearly distinguishable from the civilian population, carry their arms openly, and obey the laws of war. (Convention I, Art. 13, Sec. 1 and Sec. 2)"

    "The 1977 Protocols extend the definition of combatant to include any fighters who carry arms openly during preparation for an attack and during the attack itself, (Protocol I, Art. 44, Sec. 3)"

Similar Threads

  1. The War on Terror
    By soulbro in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 405
    Last Post: 07-24-2014, 09:20 AM
  2. Technologies of Terror
    By galaxy in forum Science Scams
    Replies: 398
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 03:58 PM
  3. In The Know: The War On Terror
    By ianmatthews in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-29-2007, 04:49 PM
  4. The Other Kind Of Terror
    By ianmatthews in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-30-2006, 11:20 PM
  5. U.S. Terror Targets
    By sojustask in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-15-2006, 04:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Add / Edit Tags
???, act of war, add, address, affairs, africa, agen, aid, allowed, amendment, america, american, another, arabs, article, attempts, bait, based, battle, beat, bit, blame, bright, business, camps, care, carry, cer, chain, chris, citizens, class, clo, collect, condo, conflicts, continue, countries, crap, death, decision, demand, democracy, destruction, dick, dictators, differently, difficult, disarm, disease, division, doesn, dog, don, dont, dyi, dying, education, effective, eme, enemy, england, enter, error, european, everyday, expand, fail, famous, favors, federal, financial, forces, freedom, fund, geneva convention, give, gonna, gotta, ground, guys, hai, haiti, handed, head, hey, high, higher, hight, horrible, hot, house, ial, ian, idiot, images, important, include, individuals, interest, internal, involved, iraq, islamic, islands, israel, issues, judge, kicking, kidding, land, large, leave, liberal, liberals, likes, lining, living, lol, long, maps, mark, market, mass, mea, members, mental, mess, move, nam, nations, nature, objects, operation, opposite, org, organization, organizations, pacific, palestinians, par, part, people, person, personal, philipines, plane, playground, policies, poor, pos, post, posts, power, presiden, presidency, prisoners, problems, protected, protection, question, quick, real, reasonable, reich, respond, ron, running, settlement, simply, site, specifically, states, stop, strength, stupid, style, successful, suggest, summer, support, supports, taxes, teach, terror, terrorism, terrorism., terrorist, thread, threatened, times, tools, totally, trial, tribute, turkey, united, united states, url, usa, vic, violence, war, weak, western, win, won, worked, worldwide

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •