+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    United Nations Human Rights Council

    In June 2006, United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan inaugurated the new United Nations Human Rights Council. The new Council is the successor to the now defunct Human Rights Commission, which was often criticized for its membership of some of the world's worst human rights abusers. There were high hopes that the new body would become the world's leading protector of human rights. At the opening ceremony, Annan said:
    "This Council represents a great new chance for the United Nations, and for humanity, to renew the struggle for human rights."

    As Eye on the UN points out

    In Darfur, there are three quarters of a million people beyond humanitarian reach, 2.5 million people displaced by the violence, 385,000 people in immediate risk of starvation, and over two million dead in twenty-two years of violence and deprivation.

    But there are no plans for the UN's lead human rights agency to have a special session on Darfur.

    a report by Human Rights Watch noted:
    In response to a nationwide strike protesting increases in the prices of rice and fuel, Guinea's security forces committed murder, rape, assault and theft against demonstrators and bystanders alike.

    To date, the Council has taken no action on human rights abuses in Guinea.

    While the Council was meeting, the Toronto Star reported on a study by Human Rights Watch that:

    There is "clear and compelling evidence" that Sri Lankan government forces are helping guerrillas to kidnap boys and young men to turn them into child soldiers.

    To date, over 65,000 people have been killed in this conflict. The Human Rights Council has never discussed the government abduction of children or the ongoing mass murder in Sri Lanka.

    The United Nations Human Rights Council has been in existence for just over six months. During that time, it has ignored terrible human rights abuses around the world.

    At the first session of the UNHRC, only one nation was singled out for criticism - Israel. The Council decided that Israel was abusing human rights and, to validate their predetermined conclusion, they ordered an investigation. The Council was very clear in what it expected the investigation to conclude. The Council
    ...decided to undertake substantive consideration of the human rights violations and implications of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and other occupied Arab territories.
    The resolution authorized a special session of the UNHRC to focus solely on Israel and that the issue should be on the agenda of all subsequent UNHRC meetings
    Unsurprisingly, at the special session called for by the earlier resolution, Israel was singled out for vehement attack. The Council approved Resolution S-1/1: Human Rights Situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. This resolution, without any mention of historical context, terrorism, or Israeli peace proposals:
    � Expressed deep concern at violations of international law by Israel;
    � Demanded that Israel end military operations in the occupied Palestinian territories; and
    � Urged Israel to release members of the Palestinian Legislative Council (who were also members of the Hamas terrorist organization)
    In August, following Hezbollah's unprovoked attack on Israel, the UNHRC decided to host another special session. Yet, the Council was not interested in how the conflict started. Instead, it created a commission of inquiry to review the situation but expressly forbid this commission from investigating the actions of Hezbollah. Resolution S-2/1 authorizing the investigation mandated that only certain aspects of the conflict would be examined. These aspects were defined as:
    "1) investigating the systematic targeting and killings of civilians by Israel in Lebanon; (b) examining the types of weapons used by Israel and their conformity with international law; and (c) assessing the extent and deadly impact of Israeli attacks on human life, property, critical infrastructure and the environment."
    The report noted that:
    It is not for the Commission to comment on the political-legal context of the adoption of resolution S-2/1, nor to make judgment on the content of its mandate. It is clear that the mandate of the Commission has limits...and does not allow for a full examination of all of the aspects of the conflict....The Commission is not entitled, even if it had wished, to construe it as equally authorizing the investigation of the actions by Hezbollah in Israel. To do so would exceed the Commission�s interpretative function and would be to usurp the Council�s powers.
    The UNHRC deliberately prevented a fair examination of the conflict. Any reasonable investigation would have noted that:
    � The conflict was initiated when Israeli soldiers were killed and kidnapped on Israeli soil.
    � Thousands of rockets were deliberately fired at civilian areas in Israel.
    � The toll in terms of lives, destroyed homes, and damage to the Israeli economy due to the war was immense.
    While ignoring any information from the government of Israel, the UNHRC accepted as fact a list of 56 "massacres by the Israeli army" from the Lebanese government. (Annex VI).
    On November 15, 19 Palestinian civilians were killed when an Israeli artillery shell veered off course, missing its intended military target. As HonestReporting pointed out, this terrible tragedy occurred due to an unintended accident. The government of Israel apologized immediately and pointed out that if the Palestinians had stopped firing rockets on Sderot, this accident could not have taken place. Yet, that same day, the UNHRC leapt into action to hold yet another special session and pass another resolution condemning Israel. Once again, there was no mention at all of the constant firing of rockets on Israeli civilian areas. There was no mention of Gilad Shalit, still held captive in Gaza. The Council provided no context at all to describe the incident.
    The Council "expressed its shock at the horror of Israeli killing of Palestinian civilians in Beit Hanoun and called for bringing the perpetrators thereof to justice". The Council decided to send a fact finding mission to "make recommendations on ways and means to protect Palestinian civilians against further Israeli assaults." No mention was made of protecting Israeli civilians from further assault.
    The United Nations Human Rights Council has been in existence for just over six months. During that time, it has ignored terrible human rights abuses around the world. It has become an organization dedicated solely to condemning and vilifying the State of Israel. As such, it lacks credibility and should not be seen by the media as a credible source on the subject of human rights. If you see your media referring to the Council without some background, let them know the facts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2015

    Re: United Nations Human Rights Council

    It has been 10 years since this post went up, and nothing has changed. The UN has become a tool of the U.S. government and NATO to pressure, threaten, or sanction nations that do not submit to their will. Where was this human rights council when American troops committed war crimes in Fallujah in 2007 (chemical weapons killed 2,000+ civilians including 219 children)? Where were they for the Haditha massacre of 24 Iraqi civilians by 4 U.S. soldiers? Let's face it, the UN is a fraud.

Similar Threads

  1. U.N. Human Rights Council to Take Aim at U.S.
    By DoubleP in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 11-07-2010, 04:09 PM
  2. What the United Nations Did This Week
    By pwrone in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 06:20 PM
  3. The United Nations of America
    By BVR USA Liaison in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2007, 01:23 PM
  4. UN Watch blasts UN Human Rights Council
    By Grim17 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-04-2007, 05:44 AM
  5. DDT and United Nations
    By cranston36 in forum Science Scams
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-21-2006, 05:43 AM

Tags for this Thread



Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts