+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

  1. #1

    Oppression of solution for rising sea levels

    Why does the mainstream media block any feature regarding Trevor Baylis' invention for dealing with rising sea levels and shrinking drinking water stocks?

    http://www.paparty.co.uk/policies/En...ntal/pol-3.htm

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,424

    Re: Oppression of solution for rising sea levels

    Quote Originally Posted by yourguardian View Post
    Why does the mainstream media block any feature regarding Trevor Baylis' invention for dealing with rising sea levels and shrinking drinking water stocks?

    http://www.paparty.co.uk/policies/En...ntal/pol-3.htm
    because it's a perpetual motion machine logic.

    Long story short the energy cost of desalinating the water is far greater than the amount energy you'd get from moving that volume of water through a turbine. I makes lip service to this but never address the problem.


    Also for any of this to work you require enough grade difference in order to generate the difference in head. Water head dosn't make any difference if you have to pump/or create a rise water up an equal amount of elevation.


    It is also pure stupidity to use this as a solution for rising sea levels.
    Water drained from the sea will return to the sea or a different sea via the sewage system or rain. It doesn't magically disappear.

    Long story short this "mainstream" parties ideas are feel good sound bites that fall that have no useful implication designed for the easily mislead.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    6,557

    Re: Oppression of solution for rising sea levels

    Quote Originally Posted by Spector567 View Post
    because it's a perpetual motion machine logic.

    Long story short the energy cost of desalinating the water is far greater than the amount energy you'd get from moving that volume of water through a turbine. I makes lip service to this but never address the problem.


    Also for any of this to work you require enough grade difference in order to generate the difference in head. Water head dosn't make any difference if you have to pump/or create a rise water up an equal amount of elevation.


    It is also pure stupidity to use this as a solution for rising sea levels.
    Water drained from the sea will return to the sea or a different sea via the sewage system or rain. It doesn't magically disappear.

    Long story short this "mainstream" parties ideas are feel good sound bites that fall that have no useful implication designed for the easily mislead.
    And distributing the water is ridiculously difficult and expensive. Here in UK we have lots of water in Scotland, and drought in parts of England. But its just impractical to even distribute water down to England, never mind the massive cost of the sort of plants suggested in that website.

    Like lots of seemingly great ideas ... falls down in practicality.

Similar Threads

  1. Increases energy levels
    By Denisekincaid in forum Medical Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-13-2015, 05:03 AM
  2. Threat levels. A fun read.
    By Old Timer in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 09:13 PM
  3. Why is McCain rising?
    By Grim17 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-24-2008, 09:53 PM
  4. Sinking To Levels Of Depravity
    By enlightenment in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-29-2006, 04:22 AM
  5. More Government oppression - girl gets £75 fine for no reason
    By Whispering wind in forum Government Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 07:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •