+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005

    The Tax-Cut Racket

    This week Obama threw a bone to progressive Democrats after nearly two years of ignoring the very people who got him elected. That bone -- meant as no disrespect to her -- is Elizabeth Warren. Obama, adverse to engaging in anything that smacks of political combat with Republicans, didn’t appoint Warren to head the new consumer protection agency she created. Instead he created a BS position, “Special Advisor” to set up the agency.

    If I were Liz I would have told Barry to take a freakin’ leap. I mean, hell, why not take it to the Senate for confirmation? Why not force Republicans to explain why they oppose a strong consumer advocate running the agency that’s sole purpose is to protect consumers against the very forces that spent the last decade raping and pillaging consumers?

    Huh? Barry? Got balls? Apparently not.

    And apparently defining himself early on as America’s first “post partisan President” meant never having to say you’re sorry… even though he has plenty to be sorry for. Damn! We should have figured that out before we voted for him. I mean, after all, how could any sane progressive be “post partisan” when the opposition is being run by Palins, Limbaughs, Boehners, McConnells, O’Connell’s, FOX, etc. Really! We should have known better. We should have taken Barry aside way back then and asked him, “Precisely what do you mean by this post-partisan business, kid?"

    Well, I’m sorry. I need to apologize to those who told me I was wrong two years ago when I opposed Hillary Clinton. Hillary was (and still is) the better man.

    Oh well, anyway, here we are again, Strap on your sad face, another disappointment looms.

    This time it’s the Bush tax cuts for the rich. It’s an issue that, like closing Gitmo and getting us out of Bush’s Middle East misadventures, Obama promised he do if we voted for him. He’s still promising to cut the tax cuts for the rich but, really? I mean holy chit man, to get from here to there he’d have to go mano-y-mano with Republicans determined to protect those tax cuts for the rich. Oh, and even worse, he will have to walk over the bodies of those dozen or so toady conservative members of his own party as well.. the ones who will argue they won’t get reelected as Democrats unless they govern like Republicans.

    Can you see Obama doing anything more aggressive than working him mouth? Once upon a time I could imagine that a black kid for Chicago could teach those DC white kids from the South how to rumble, Chicago style.

    But no longer. The best I can imagine now is Obama explaining yet another Faustian bargain with the Dark Side. If, in the middle of the worst economy since the last Great Depression, Obama can’t get the Bush tax cuts for the rich repealed, then we can’t expect him to do anything to change America’s rightward trajectory. The American middle class will melt away, along with the ice caps. The poor will get poorer, as they already have.

    The overall poverty rate climbed to 14.3 per cent, or 43.6 million people, the Census Bureau said yesterday.

    Sooner than later the wealthy will, for good reason, begin fearing their own countrymen, and retreat behind walled, guarded communities. The conversations behind those walls will soon mirror the old medieval gag:

    Page: Sire, the peasants are revolting!
    Sire: “Yes, they certainly are!

    The wealthy should beware of getting what they want. If they do it will only be a matter of time before class warfare will move from the statistical realm to the streets. And, if the rich think taxing them is bad for business, just wait until they see what widespread unrest does for sales.

    Oh, you betchya.

    Have a nice day.

    The Tax-Cut Racket


    “Nice middle class you got here,” said Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader. “It would be a shame if something happened to it.”
    O.K., he didn’t actually say that. But he might as well have, because that’s what the current confrontation over taxes amounts to. Mr. McConnell, who was self-righteously denouncing the budget deficit just the other day, now wants to blow that deficit up with big tax cuts for the rich. But he doesn’t have the votes. So he’s trying to get what he wants by pointing a gun at the heads of middle-class families, threatening to force a jump in their taxes unless he gets paid off with hugely expensive tax breaks for the wealthy.

    Most discussion of the tax fight focuses either on the economics or on the politics — both of which suggest that Democrats should hang tough, for their own sakes as well as that of the country. But there’s an even bigger issue here — namely, the question of what constitutes acceptable behavior in American political life. Politics ain’t beanbag, but there’s a difference between playing hardball and engaging in outright extortion, which is what Mr. McConnell is now doing. And if he succeeds, it will set a disastrous precedent.

    How did we get to this point? The proximate answer lies in the tactics the Bush administration used to push through tax cuts. The deeper answer lies in the radicalization of the Republican Party, its transformation into a movement willing to put the economy and the nation at risk for the sake of partisan victory.

    So, about those tax cuts: back in 2001, the Bush administration bundled huge tax cuts for wealthy Americans with much smaller tax cuts for the middle class, then pretended that it was mainly offering tax breaks to ordinary families. Meanwhile, it circumvented Senate rules intended to prevent irresponsible fiscal actions — rules that would have forced it to find spending cuts to offset its $1.3 trillion tax cut — by putting an expiration date of Dec. 31, 2010, on the whole bill. And the witching hour is now upon us. If Congress doesn’t act, the Bush tax cuts will turn into a pumpkin at the end of this year, with tax rates reverting to Clinton-era levels.

    In response, President Obama is proposing legislation that would keep tax rates essentially unchanged for 98 percent of Americans but allow rates on the richest 2 percent to rise. But Republicans are threatening to block that legislation, effectively raising taxes on the middle class, unless they get tax breaks for their wealthy friends.

    That’s an extraordinary step. Almost everyone agrees that raising taxes on the middle class in the middle of an economic slump is a bad idea, unless the effects are offset by other job-creation programs — and Republicans are blocking those, too. So the G.O.P. is, in effect, threatening to plunge the U.S. economy back into recession unless Democrats pay up.

    What kind of political party would engage in that kind of brinksmanship? The answer is the same kind of party that shut down the federal government in 1995 in an attempt to force President Bill Clinton to accept steep cuts in Medicare, and is actively discussing doing the same to Mr. Obama. So, as I said, the deeper explanation of the tax-cut fight is that it’s ultimately about a radicalized Republican Party, which accepts no limits on partisanship.
    So should Democrats give in?

    On the economics, the answer is a clear no. Right now, fears about budget deficits are overblown — but that doesn’t mean that we should completely ignore deficit concerns. And the G.O.P. plan would add hugely to the deficit — about $700 billion over the next decade — while doing little to help the economy. On any kind of cost-benefit analysis, this is an idea not worth considering.

    And, by the way, a compromise solution — temporary tax breaks for the rich — is no better; it would cost less, but it would also do even less for the economy.

    On the politics, the answer is also a clear no. Polls show that a majority of Americans are opposed to maintaining tax breaks for the rich.

    Beyond that, this is no time for Democrats to play it safe: if the midterm election were held today, they would lose badly. They need to highlight their differences with the G.O.P. — and it’s hard to think of a better place for them to take a stand than on the issue of big giveaways to Wall Street and corporate C.E.O.’s.

    But what’s even more important is the principle of the thing. Threats to punish innocent bystanders unless your political rivals give you what you want have no legitimate place in democratic politics. Giving in to such threats would be an economic and political mistake, but more important, it would be morally wrong — and it would encourage more such threats in the future.

    It’s time for Democrats to take a stand, and say no to G.O.P. blackmail.

    (Another must read here: http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=1F08C3F8-18FE-70B2-A800D860B17F3751


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    SW United States

    Re: The Tax-Cut Racket

    You're still buying into Krugman's crap?

    Damn girl.


Similar Threads

  1. Swindler's List: A Look Into The Holocaust(tm) Racket
    By dchristie in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-02-2012, 03:24 PM
  2. Mel Gibson Targeted By Zionists' Shakedown Racket
    By dchristie in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 08:53 AM
  3. FBI Closing In On Fox-GOP Fake News & Lies Racket
    By dchristie in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2011, 06:31 AM
  4. ACORN's Illegal Alien Home Loan Racket
    By pwrone in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2009, 12:13 AM
  5. Eye On The Zionist Mafia's Intn'l Sex Slave Racket
    By dchristie in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 07-19-2007, 08:02 AM

Tags for this Thread



Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts