Closed Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Calling you out BarackZero

    Oh where does this start? Well, other than the constant stream of bullshit he pours whenever he's in a corner (usually consisting of nothing more than attacking spelling errors) now his balls have ascended even further into his torso that he now finds it necessary to add LogicallyYours and I to his block list.

    Well, that sure tells you something, doesn't it?

    Oh yes things are so much easier when you can just spew shit for as long as you want and not have to answer for any of it, just like Kent Hovind. Of course it's always the "Godless Leftist" who are intellectually dishonest and its always the honest conservative Christians like BarackZero here who always have the scientific and moral highground, right? People like that don't need to hide behind an ingore list so they don't have to listen when people point out when they're clearly wrong, right?

    Yep, that's BarackZero for you. He's so smart, he can always debunk any counterarguments presented to him and not just simply attack typo's and grammatical errors. He doesn't post the same thing over and over and over again without chaning anthing even when it was disproved the first time, and he certianly isn't some whiney little bitch who just cant stand to read when people present counterarguements. Oh no only shittly little atheists do that....

    Oh, and what exactly does he get "right" in his eyes?
    Here's one:
    Now when animals "evolved" and developed eyes, that was going UP the slopes of Mount Improbable.

    And, when for example fish LOST their eyes in caves, that TOO was going UP the slopes of Mount Improbable.

    Got it? It's all so simple when you're a godless leftist.
    Oh, except
    You would almost have a point if fish with functional eyes and fish without eyes lived in the same habitat. They don't. In caves and deep oceans there is no light, therefore eyes are a waste. In those situations, losing eyesight is going up. In other situations where light is present, losing eyesight is going down Mt. Improbable, hence that's why no shallow water fish have completely lost their eyes. Both gaining and losing eyes are never both "going up" in the same circumstances; the situation for both has to be different (and they are).
    Whenever the words "cave" and "fish" appear in the same sentance BarackZero here simply can't have anything to do with it. And what to good, honest scientists do when they're presented with a difficult question? Well, apparently they ignore it.

    I should probably add a poll:
    "Who will BarackZero add to his ignore list next?", only I'd have to add all but maybe 3 people active on this forum.


    Oh yeah, now that ALL of BarackZero's posts have lost ALL of their meaningful content, should his behavior be considered a violation of Rule #8?
    Last edited by Blue Crab of PAIN!!!; 01-07-2010 at 09:37 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    This thread will always stay on top. The guy who uses the ignore function is the guy who lost the argument.
    Last edited by Blue Crab of PAIN!!!; 01-08-2010 at 08:20 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    I'm going to try to keep a tally of the points BZ misses and/or ignores, or the simply stupid things he does.
    Here's one for now:

    SubJunk writes:
    Here's the cycle:
    Step 1: BarackZero says we're not giving evidence
    Step 2: We give evidence
    Step 3: BarackZero replies to tiny parts of the evidence and sprinkles in some ad hominem attacks
    Step 4: Repeat
    BarackZero replies with
    Call now, just 5 easy payments of blissful ignorance! - SubJunk, two posts earlier

    My profound apologies to an "administrator" who cannot be put on ignore.

    Your brilliance is truly wonderful.
    Please, enlighten me more.
    I am in awe of your intellectualism.
    .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    This thread
    Is something of a microchasm of everything BarackZero is. He writes bullshit, someone points out that his bullshit is bullshit, and then he ignores it and claims intellectual superiority for it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    Here's something that I forgot about:
    Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    How can we know the mind of God?
    How is that possible? What are His mechanics? It seems to me that God set things into motion, created the universe and the earth and animal life in abundance, and DNA offers up small but significant changes.

    Nobody is suggesting that we abandon science, as is so often claimed.
    Anyone see the potential conflict of interest there?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    Originally Posted by BarackZero
    Einstein found his scientific finding so repulsive that he resorted to manipulation, rather like today's *scientists* who preach their political agenda of anthropomorphic global warming to us, and hide data, falsify figures, fudge, cheat, mislead, and attack those who do not comport with their socialist power-grabbing mentality.
    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Crab of PAIN!!! View Post
    In the same thread:


    Quote Originally Posted by BorisZ View Post
    He did not believe in God. That is totally different from hating God. If you hate God that means that you still believe he exists.

    Einstein used "biggest blunder of my life" more than one time. One time he refereed to coining term "cosmology" and another to theory of Universe contracting/expending.
    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    I didn't know that Einstein was a referee.
    Interesting.

    And how does the universe "expend"?
    http://scam.com/showthread.php?t=124363

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    This one made me LOL

    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kazza View Post
    Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    One begins sentences with words, not numbers. You meant to write "where" but instead, you wrote "were."

    Such ignorance is indicative of junior high school mentality, which you display again and again.
    Originally Posted by BarackZero
    Since the topic of this, my thred, is "Darwinism Defended," and I named the author, Michael Ruse, how anyone could possibly call that "plagiarism" is inconceivable. Wretched dishonesty has no place in any discussion. Nevertheless, leftists and atheists and other condescending haters of Christians and conservatives persist in lying time and time again.
    You meant to write "thread" but instead, you wrote "thred".

    Such ignorance is indicative of junior high school mentatlity, which you display again and again.
    The subject is the book Darwinism Defended, by Michael Ruse.

    Grow up and stop showing your ignorance. You couldn't even google the idiot professor who pissed away $3,000,000 on a Nigerian internet scam.
    That thread is, in fact, just a good one to read regardless.
    Last edited by Blue Crab of PAIN!!!; 01-10-2010 at 05:42 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    http://scam.com/showthread.php?t=119646

    Quote Originally Posted by Blue Crab of PAIN!!! View Post
    Oh Really? Gee, I don't ever remember you quoting my refute to your cave fish argument and then explaining how my rebuttal was a lie. In fact, the only time you have ever acknowledged said argument you just used the same exact thing twice. If you think you're so smart why don't you provide a MEANINGFUL explaination for yourself (and don't use the SAME one for a third time).
    Whoops, would you look at that, he posted it for a third time

    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Very enlightening comments.
    No, really. PaulM, you should be so proud of your pal, Crabby Boy in Pain. He's about as hateful as Richard Dawkins, but much more vulgar.

    Climbing Mount Improbable, by Richard Hateful Dawkins

    P. 91 “There can be no going downhill - species can’t get worse as a prelude to getting better.”
    P. 132 - “It cannot be said often enough that Darwinian theory does not allow for getting temporarily worse in quest of a long-term goal.”
    P. 134 - “To say it again, going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by Natural Selection.”


    [Note: Developing eyes is going "uphill." Then losing them is ALSO going "uphill." It's sooo simple, really.]
    Here's the first time

    Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post

    Lovely. Gaining eyes is going "up" Mount Improbable, and then losing those eyes is also going "up" Mount Improbable. You are clever with words, but not with science.
    And here's the second

    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Page 134 To say it again, going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by Natural Selection.”

    Now when animals "evolved" and developed eyes, that was going UP the slopes of Mount Improbable.

    And, when for example fish LOST their eyes in caves, that TOO was going UP the slopes of Mount Improbable.

    Got it? It's all so simple when you're a godless leftist.

    More from the master of deceit himself:

    Page 80 “Mutations can be reversed (‘back mutations’). For most genes, mutation in either direction is equally probable.”


    But when the mutations go forward, that is UP the slopes of Mount Improbable, and when they go backwards, that too is going UP the slopes of Mount Improbable.

    If you can't comprehend these subtleties, you're either ignorant, stupid, wicked or insane. Just ask any Dawkins Robot.
    Last edited by Blue Crab of PAIN!!!; 01-10-2010 at 05:57 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    This one was just halarious

    So far I've just cherrypicked things that I've responded to. Maybe I'll bring up other things by other people if I feel the motivation to later on.
    Last edited by Blue Crab of PAIN!!!; 01-10-2010 at 06:04 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    I can smell hypocracy a mile away.

    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Call now, just 5 easy payments of blissful ignorance! - SubJunk, two posts earlier

    My profound apologies to an "administrator" who cannot be put on ignore.

    Your brilliance is truly wonderful.
    Please, enlighten me more.
    I am in awe of your intellectualism.
    No response from the Almighty Moderator, who first engages in hateful ad hominems, and then preaches against them.

    Meanwhile, your best, most informative post? Nowhere to be seen. Typical of the Anointed Class.

  11. 02-06-2010, 12:12 PM


  12. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    Please note the speed at which "Praetorian Man" was blocked.
    This is quite handy to point out since this seems to be the only discussion the two had before BZ resorted to Ignore and makes everything easy to understand
    BarackZero is called out for being wrong, and his tactics are called out for being crap.
    What does BZ do? He puts his opposition on ignore and pretends that he's smarter for doing it.
    http://scam.com/showthread.php?t=125191

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    Quote Originally Posted by BarackZero View Post
    Of all individuals, one would EXPECT a "moderator" to be fair and courteous to everyone. Your leftist pal, Boy SubJunk, did not come close to this.

    Am I clear so far?

    Why is it that you didn't "guess" an answer to my questions regarding the space of cytochrome C, hmmm genius?
    Couldn't you find anything to "cut&paste" (sic)?


    Finally, since BoySubJunk gave away the subject of his thread, Darwinism, it is quite clear that he did nothing more than cite other people and thereby feign his own enlightenment.

    If in fact he, or you, were so smart, then both of you would have handily answered my questions of you.

    Instead, you ignored them, rather like, well, I won't use the vile epithet you used against me.


    "There are only two kinds of people, decent and indecent." - Elie Wiesel

    ciao

    You may now join your inane pals, who, like you, have nothing to contribute.
    http://scam.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=873906
    I don't know if I should be laughing or crying.

  14. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,081

    Re: Calling you out BarackZero

    This thread is now closed by self-request.

Similar Threads

  1. Calling All Faithful!
    By mumbles in forum Religious Scams
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-17-2010, 09:01 PM
  2. More Name-calling From The Democrats
    By Travelman18 in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 05:36 AM
  3. calling you out
    By djbombsquad in forum MLM Scams
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-01-2008, 04:10 AM
  4. Calling Mods!
    By JenaV in forum General Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-09-2007, 10:53 PM
  5. Calling All Europeans
    By sojustask in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-26-2006, 09:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •