+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    The SBT could not have happened.

    No like experiment was ever conducted that replicated the shot that killed Kennedy.

    There were too many grains to account for.

    158.6 grains for the magic bullet plus,
    the grains in Kennedy and Connelly added up to more than the new ( pristine) condition of the bullet which is 161grains)

    Allegedly shattered rib , radius ( good strong bone) and ended up without being deformed.

    Bullets fired through goats showed significant deformity.

    Shooting a wrist shows significant deformity.

    Every cadaver shot showed front of the bullet deformed.

    NO way can this bullet be fired into a wrist and not be deformed.

    There is no way this bullet did the damage it supposedly did.




    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk4QkyDdBMw


    Wecht challenged autopists to show another bullet that did what this bullet did and never heard from them.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,115

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    Quote Originally Posted by theme View Post
    The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    The SBT could not have happened.

    No like experiment was ever conducted that replicated the shot that killed Kennedy.

    There were too many grains to account for.

    158.6 grains for the magic bullet plus,
    the grains in Kennedy and Connelly added up to more than the new ( pristine) condition of the bullet which is 161grains)

    Allegedly shattered rib , radius ( good strong bone) and ended up without being deformed.

    Bullets fired through goats showed significant deformity.

    Shooting a wrist shows significant deformity.

    Every cadaver shot showed front of the bullet deformed.

    NO way can this bullet be fired into a wrist and not be deformed.

    There is no way this bullet did the damage it supposedly did.




    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk4QkyDdBMw


    Wecht challenged autopists to show another bullet that did what this bullet did and never heard from them.
    The single bullet could indeed have happened.

    Several of your claims above are based on falsehoods.

    Number one the bullet was never in pristine condition that word pristine was thrown out by Jim Garrison to influence a jury and was not accurate. The Bullet is damaged and in a manner quite consistent with such expended bullets which have hit more than one person.

    Of course no like experiment was ever conducted. Since when does one sacrifice another person by shooting them in the head to test a theory? Even if they did it would be impossible to perfectly reproduce the small variables which exist between two separate bullets. But in fact many many tests show that yes the wounds caused are not unusual.

    The bullet was deformed in the back end not in the nose which is expected because like many military rounds this bullet was a tumbler. When it struck Kennedy it would have begun tumbling end over end while still describing its arc of travel. The wound in Connally's back is perfectly consistent with this since it was a linear entrance wound not a puncture wound. The bullet entered his back sideways. it therefore exited sideways and struck his wrist at angle with the back end first which is where the deformation in the bullet is found.

    The tests you mention on goats and cadavars are not relevant since all of them failed to copy the distance the bullet was fired from. They all fired similar bullets at close or point blank range which does not take into account the loss of velocity which would have occurred from the bullet traveling through the air. They also do not copy the fact that the bullet passed through Kennedy without striking bone. This fact means the bullet would have slowed down considerably but also would not have struck anything solid enough to cause damage. By the time it did strike a bone solid enough to cause damage it was traveling much slower than its original muzzle velocity while also tumbling at an angle. Since none of the experiments took these facts into account they are not relevant or scientifically sound.

    What amazes me is you are now going in circles and repeating myths which have been discussed in these threads already and debunked.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    454

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    I stopped reading your response soup when you tried to discredit the word "pristine" and Jim Garrison.

    The word " pristine" is not to be used against us.

    The bullet would be in "pristine" or original or perfect condition at 162 grains without marks or any kind that would not be usual for a bullet in the box.

    This bullet at nearly "pristine" condition in terms of weight, almost satisfied the condition of appearance.

    It had but a scratch.

    The bullet was NOT pristine. It weighed 158.5 grains while an unfired bullet weighed 162.

    It also had a scratch along the side which also made it NOT pristine.

    It was not unfired or "pristine".

    It was, however, fired into something like water or cotton, planted to frame the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald on November 22, 1963.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,115

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    Quote Originally Posted by theme View Post
    I stopped reading your response soup when you tried to discredit the word "pristine" and Jim Garrison.

    The word " pristine" is not to be used against us.

    The bullet would be in "pristine" or original or perfect condition at 162 grains without marks or any kind that would not be usual for a bullet in the box.

    This bullet at nearly "pristine" condition in terms of weight, almost satisfied the condition of appearance.

    It had but a scratch.

    The bullet was NOT pristine. It weighed 158.5 grains while an unfired bullet weighed 162.

    It also had a scratch along the side which also made it NOT pristine.

    It was not unfired or "pristine".

    It was, however, fired into something like water or cotton, planted to frame the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald on November 22, 1963.

    You are the one insisting on describing it as pristine and it is not pristine whatsoever.

    Furthermore your attempt to minimize the damage tot he bullet is also false.

    It is not merely SCRATCHED along one side as you claim.

    It was caved in and deformed in a manner consistent with striking a hard object ( bone ).

    Get that fact straight it was never pristine or even close to pristine and to call it such is a lie.

    Furthermore your claim that it weighs less than it should is based on a completly false assumption.

    Your assumption is that a bullet is always destined to fragment when it strikes a hard abject and that is simply not true.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,826

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    The SBT could not have happened.
    Bull shit, proven that it did.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSBXW1-VGmM

    No like experiment was ever conducted that replicated the shot that killed Kennedy.
    Bull shit. Replicated by Discovery Channel

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13wfs...eature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZRUN...eature=related


    You are a super bull shit artist and a no life conspiracy drinking moron. Get out of Mommy's basement and get a en life!

  6. #6

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    You're going about it the wrong way. If you want to get dirty, lay down with the pigs. If you want to prove the SBT incorrect, simply prove WHEN John Connally was shot in the back.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,826

    Re: The Magic Bullet ( the SBT Theory)

    There is no way this bullet did the damage it supposedly did.
    Are you experianced in shooting rifles?

    The bullet did not jog, did not make turns, did not run a slalom....

    it went strait through 2 people as most high powered rifle rounds do.

    Did you know that the Carcano was the most prefered big game rifle in Africa because it had the ability to pierce the skull of bull elephants?

    three shots, one dead president.

Similar Threads

  1. Magic Bullet System
    By ComradeChen in forum Work at Home Scams
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-06-2011, 06:56 AM
  2. The "magic bullet" theory has to be rejected.
    By $ick3nin.vend3tta in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 08:11 AM
  3. Single Bullet Theory: The Fraud Explained
    By theme in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-09-2009, 12:31 PM
  4. Destroying the Single Bullet Theory - Part 1
    By theme in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 07:29 AM
  5. Destroying the Single Bullet Theory - Part 4
    By theme in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-22-2008, 03:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •