+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Bill Newman

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    253

    Bill Newman

    Invariably, it becomes clear to the unbiased viewer that this was a well planned assassination; a concerted, well-orchestrated event and therefore a conspiracy.

    We need to soberly face truth wherever and whenever it arises. This 'on the scene' 'eyewitness' told what he saw and heard. To question his ears' triangulation abilities is to reveal bias and intent beyond a desire for facts and truth. There is so much evidence that cannot be ignored. This is only a small portion, yet it leaves no doubt that there were, in fact shots from the front.

    He states he saw Kennedy HIT in the temple.


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=pweuPLTVfl4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,115

    Re: Bill Newman

    Quote Originally Posted by eflteacher View Post
    Invariably, it becomes clear to the unbiased viewer that this was a well planned assassination; a concerted, well-orchestrated event and therefore a conspiracy.

    We need to soberly face truth wherever and whenever it arises. This 'on the scene' 'eyewitness' told what he saw and heard. To question his ears' triangulation abilities is to reveal bias and intent beyond a desire for facts and truth. There is so much evidence that cannot be ignored. This is only a small portion, yet it leaves no doubt that there were, in fact shots from the front.

    He states he saw Kennedy HIT in the temple.


    http://youtube.com/watch?v=pweuPLTVfl4
    No one can see such a thing sorry he THINKS he saw Kennedy hit in the temple the fact is however bullet wounds t the head are explosive and no one can SEE where it came from under such circumstances.

    What he , you and others keep ignoring is the hardcore and irrefutable proof established by the autopsy which is irrefutable and that is the entrance wound was IN THE BACK OF KENNEDY'S head.

    Witnesses such as Newman are not reliable and not just in this case but in ANY criminal court case.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    253

    Re: Bill Newman

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    No one can see such a thing sorry he THINKS he saw Kennedy hit in the temple the fact is however bullet wounds t the head are explosive and no one can SEE where it came from under such circumstances.

    What he , you and others keep ignoring is the hardcore and irrefutable proof established by the autopsy which is irrefutable and that is the entrance wound was IN THE BACK OF KENNEDY'S head.

    Witnesses such as Newman are not reliable and not just in this case but in ANY criminal court case.
    Newman and the other 60 odd witnesses stating a shot came from the front are reliable. You just cant face the truth.

    The autopsy photos were faked. Numerous witnesses , including Secret Service agents stated the back of Kennedy's head was blown away.

    That contradicts with the autopsy photos and proves they are fake.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,115

    Re: Bill Newman

    Quote Originally Posted by eflteacher View Post
    Newman and the other 60 odd witnesses stating a shot came from the front are reliable. You just cant face the truth.

    The autopsy photos were faked. Numerous witnesses , including Secret Service agents stated the back of Kennedy's head was blown away.

    That contradicts with the autopsy photos and proves they are fake.
    Uh no little one .

    Newman is unreliable because he is one of a very few who HEARD something different than most witnesses. This is normal in ANy case where mutiple ear or eyewitnesses are involved. One would be follish to ignore the consensus of a huge majority of witnesses in favor of a very few.

    Your claim that 60 people heard what Newman heard is false it is less than 30 and most of them changed their story drastically several times over the years.

    Newman may be an honest guy but he simply got it wrong Most heard 3 and only 3 shots coming from the TBSD.

    No secret Service agent claimed SPECIFICALLY or PRECISELY that the BACK of Kennedy's head was burst open only that he was shot in the head and the trauma was mainly on the right side.

    Either way the head always bursts explosively when a bullet passes through it and in this case the bursting effect was ON THE SIDE not the rear. We could split hairs and argue that it was more to the back than toward the front but that is irrelevant to the direction the bullet came from.

    There is not one shred of evidence that the autopsy sketches photos or records were faked that is a desperate attempt by you to deny FACT. The autospy evidence proves the entrance wound was in the back and a small number of conflicting witnesses proves nothing different.

    Keep in mind the standard I am relying on would work in Any and all court cases. Solid evidence such as an autopsy report always trumps a minority of witnesses and this is in accordance with psychology and science. You need to do a lot of studying about how real investigations work. Such as how detectives solve crimes. Oswald acted alone that is proven by a mountain of evidence which any second rate prosecutor could have easily used to convict him. The chances of some legal star defense lawyer beating that evidence is remote at best.

    This is why in these arguments it is actual the conspiracy nuts who are naive , gullible and out of touch with the facts.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    253

    Re: Bill Newman

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    This is why in these arguments it is actual the lone nuts who are naive , gullible and out of touch with the facts.

    I agree with you on this one Soup.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,115

    Re: Bill Newman

    Quote Originally Posted by eflteacher View Post
    I agree with you on this one Soup.
    If you are going to quote me quote me do not be such a cheap liar you have to misquote me and then pretend you cut and pasted it.

    True sign here that you are so badly beaten in this argument you have to resort to manufacturing quotes.

Similar Threads

  1. Newman Bruce is a SCAMMER
    By jerrybrisco in forum Internet Scams
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-14-2011, 03:16 AM
  2. John Newman Oswald and the CIA
    By eflteacher in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 06:48 AM
  3. Luxury Autos Of Queens (Newman Bruce) - scam
    By jason polan in forum Corporate Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-15-2009, 08:30 AM
  4. Paul Newman
    By peregrine in forum General Chat
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-19-2008, 01:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •