+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    374

    Cognitive Science Needs a Visceral Connection

    Cognitive Science Needs a Visceral Connection

    The visceral (instinctive, unreasoning, and ‘earthy’) domain of human reality is not exclusively the domain of intellection but is a partnership with the crude and earthy emotions that are so dominate a part of human experience.

    A new manner of thinking was born in Greece in the five centuries BC. This might properly be called the Pagan Period. Webster informs me that a pagan is a follower of a polytheistic religion or one with little or no religion and who delight in sensual pleasures and material goods. Modern day America seems to fulfill at least one aspect of that definition of paganism.

    The Pagan Period was followed by what might be called the Catholic Period. The Catholic Period was a millennium in which the Catholic Church dominated Western civilization.

    The manner of thinking born in the Pagan Period and nurtured during the Catholic Period might properly be called the philosophical manner of thinking. Philosophy, born in Greece and nurtured during the millennium following, was grounded in the mind/body dichotomy introduced by Descartes under the heavy influence of an overseeing Catholic Church.

    I claim that Western philosophical tradition is today at the cusp of adolescence leading into adulthood. This major paradigm shift is constructed on the recognition that we can no longer ground our philosophical attitudes on the mind/body dichotomy and must recognize the validity of the empirical scientific theories centered about the idea of the embodied cognition. This theory can be justified as a result of the technology that makes observation of brain actions observable.

    Classical cognitive science assumes that “cognition consists of the application of universal logical and formal rules that govern the manipulation of “internal” mental symbols, symbols that are supposedly capable of representing states of affairs in the “external” world.” Classical cognitive science treats mind as a computational program.


    Alan Turing (1937) developed the idea of the human mind acting as a universal computing machine. Further developments of Turing’s ideas led to the development that the human brain was conceived as a physical symbol system capable of operating on symbols in a logical fashion. Hence the metaphor ‘Mind as Computer’ became the rage of the electronic and computer sciences.

    The internal/external split characterizing this view illuminates the idea that this computational function can be detached from the body of the organism, which means that any number of contraptions might perform adequately the actions of the human mind.

    First generation cognitive science developed a science of cognition constructed around the ‘Mind as Computer’ metaphor. This was labeled as AI (Artificial Intelligence).

    SGCS (Second Generation Cognitive Science) developed a science of cognition constructed around the ‘Cognition in the Body’ metaphor. Rather than thinking of cognition as a manipulator of symbols, human cognition and our bodies are a gestalt; so integrated as to constitute a functioning unit with properties not derivable by summation of its parts.

    Quotes from The Meaning of the Body by Mark Johnson



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    838

    Re: Cognitive Science Needs a Visceral Connection

    Quote Originally Posted by coberst
    The visceral (instinctive, unreasoning, and ‘earthy’) domain of human reality is not exclusively the domain of intellection but is a partnership with the crude and earthy emotions that are so dominate a part of human experience.
    Then, you would surely enjoy....
    The Vagina
    Monologues
    .
    Last edited by phlipper; 04-15-2009 at 12:46 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    26,288

    Re: Cognitive Science Needs a Visceral Connection

    vagina rules and any man so inclined to dismiss this HOLY premise does so at his own demise of purpose!? the seemingly idiotic question is.......why is this SO, PICARD!? :
    i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

Similar Threads

  1. Science Channel Support our Science Contest?
    By Contest Scams in forum Mail Order Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-05-2015, 05:57 PM
  2. How about that REPUBLICS god connection? Impressive !!
    By Liberal in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-28-2015, 09:19 PM
  3. NASA piling garbage science on science fraud
    By aguest in forum Science Scams
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 01:18 PM
  4. Bib Laden still not wanted in connection w/9-11
    By California Surfin in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 06:27 AM
  5. The Democrat-Zionist Connection
    By Ronald in forum Political Scams
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-29-2006, 10:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •