Reply to Thread

Post a reply to the thread: The Men who Killed Kennedy

Your Message

Click here to log in

 

Additional Options

  • Will turn www.example.com into [URL]http://www.example.com[/URL].

HTML
Rate Thread

You may rate this thread from 1-star (Terrible) to 5-stars (Excellent) if you wish to do so.

Topic Review (Newest First)

  • 12-05-2016, 03:56 PM
    7forever

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Not until very recently did I realize that jfk was shot in the back right before the headshot. My focus was always on the exit wound and the headshot with some work put into the bullet hole in the windshield. I never had strong feelings about the last 2 shots, but mostly believed one was fired to confuse those on elm street.

    Everything important has finally come together and makes perfect sense for the universal belief that the president was shot three times. Two of those shots coming from the front make any rear shooter totally irrelevant. This new evidence is the only way the government would ever revise this case because they could simply add a gunshot wound without changing any prior conclusions from decades ago.

    The back shot had to come from a different shooter because there wasn't enough time to get off another shot, as the last 2 shots were separated by less than a 1/4 second. It takes at least 3/4 of a second between shots.

    http://www.jfk-online.com/bennett.html

    "At this point I heard what sounded like a fire-cracker. I immediately looked from the right/crowd/physical area/and looked towards the President who was seated in the right rear seat of his limousine open convertible. At the moment I looked at the back of the President I heard another fire-cracker noise and saw the shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulder. A second shot followed immediately and hit the right rear high of the President's head."

    How Five Investigations into JFK's Medical/Autopsy Evidence Got it Wrong - Discussion

    Secret Service agent Glenn Bennett was riding in the follow up car. He was the first to document, in contemporaneous notes, Kennedy taking the back shot. He wrote, “"I looked at the back of the President. I heard another firecracker noise and saw that shot hit the President about four inches down from the right shoulder."[339] The Warren Commission accorded his observations “substantial weight,” writing, "Although [Bennett’s] formal statement was dated November 23, 1963, his notes indicate that he recorded what he saw and heard at 5:30 p.m., November 22, 1963, on the airplane en route back to Washington, prior to the autopsy, when it was not yet known that the President had been hit in the back.”[

    For starters, the Zapruder film clearly shows jfk's back being impacted right before he's shot in the face. It kinda looks like a 'pow' from a batman episode. The other two films also show an impact but not quite the same way. What SS agent Glen Bennett reported seeing is exactly confirmed by all three films. For all intents and purposes the jfk assassination has finally been solved.

  • 11-27-2016, 05:05 PM
    7forever

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    The bullet entered above the right eye, which is corroborated by all three films and Chaney's up-close view of the President. All eyes by those men were fixed on the car because Greer suddenly pumped the brakes. Jfk was shot in the back right before the headshot, which is depicted more clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

    http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot...on-part-2.html

    Let’s begin with James Chaney.
    Chaney was the motorcycle Officer riding to the right rear of President Kennedy’s limousine - in the inboard position. Despite being the closet non-limousine witness to the assassination – he was never called to testify before the Warren Commission! Following the assassination, he was interviewed by Bill Lord from WFAA –TV. This is how he described the shooting:

    “We had proceeded west on Elm Street at approximately 15-20 miles per hour. We heard the first shot. I thought it was a motorcycle backfiring and uh I looked back over to my left and also President Kennedy looked back over his left shoulder. Then, the, uh, second shot came, well, then I looked back just in time to see the President struck in the face by the second bullet. He slumped forward into Mrs. Kennedy’s lap, and uh, it was apparent to me that we were being fired upon.



  • 04-14-2011, 06:54 AM
    eugene66

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    No that more accurately describes you.

    My reality is the only reality which exists independent of people and which science proves.

    And you take what I stated as fact because you cannot refute it and you hate it.
    Me hate? You psychic or did some official tell you?

    I'm just having fun stating my truth and seeing you puking hatred and calling me names because of it.

    Keep it up my good man.

    You don't have a reality. Your only reality is that the ones presented is not so and never happened and does not prove anything.

    If you had a reality you would have posted some support for it. But I suppose you are waiting for the vote to decide how real it is.
  • 04-14-2011, 05:24 AM
    Soupnazi630

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Quote Originally Posted by eugene66 View Post
    Well coming from someone like you, whose reality is based on majority opinion and created delusion, I take that as ........yeah whatever.
    No that more accurately describes you.

    My reality is the only reality which exists independent of people and which science proves.

    And you take what I stated as fact because you cannot refute it and you hate it.
  • 04-13-2011, 07:21 PM
    eugene66

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Originally Posted by eugene66
    You are hilarious.

    So if I can go to that circus you call a courtroom and do my smoke and mirrors to convince a jury that I am right THEN it becomes real?? When I get others to believe me too?

    Before that it's not?

    How very scientific of you.

    Dogma rules Woof woof.
    Quote Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
    No little fool hilarious is some idiot claiming body language proves anything.

    And so you admit it does not and can now shut up and move on
    Well coming from someone like you, whose reality is based on majority opinion and created delusion, I take that as ........yeah whatever.
  • 04-13-2011, 08:41 AM
    7forever
    Clint Hill saw the hole Greer caused

    Clint describes a massive exit that could have only been caused by that goon, Greer.

    Clint Hill saw the massive hole on the right rear portion of his head.

    Mr. HILL. This is the first sound that I heard; yes, sir. I jumped from the car, realizing that something was wrong, ran to the Presidential limousine. Just about as I reached it, there was another sound, which was different than the first sound. I think I described it in my statement as though someone was shooting a r*****er into a hard object--it seemed to have some type of an echo. I put my right foot, I believe it was, on the left rear step of the automobile, and I had a hold of the handgrip with my hand, when the car lurched forward. I lost my footing and I had to run about three or four more steps before I could get back up in the car.
    Between the time I originally grabbed the handhold and until I was up on the car, Mrs. Kennedy--the second noise that I heard had removed a portion of the President's head, and he had slumped noticeably to his left. Mrs. Kennedy had jumped up from the seat and was, it appeared to me, reaching for something coming off the right rear bumper of the car, the right rear tail, when she noticed that I was trying to climb on the car. She turned toward me and I grabbed her and put her back in the back seat, crawled up on top of the back seat and lay there.


    Mr. SPECTER. What did you observe as to President Kennedy's condition on arrival at the hospital?
    Mr. HILL. The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of the car. His brain was exposed. There was blood and bits of brain all over the entire rear portion of the car. Mrs. Kennedy was completely covered with blood. There was so much blood you could not tell if there had been any other wound or not, except for the one large gaping wound in the right rear portion of the head.

    The back of his head opens up at the moment of the front right impact.

    FRAME 337
  • 04-13-2011, 08:40 AM
    7forever
    You can literally see skull detaching from his rear skull. Also, notice as his goes back you can see the white lane through the back of his head.LOL
  • 04-13-2011, 08:39 AM
    7forever
    The driver killed kennedy

    The back of jfk's head opens up after 312 but before 313. The impact's in the right front, not the right side.
  • 04-13-2011, 08:37 AM
    7forever
    The altered gun is visible before, during and after the shot.
    318 is the fake reflection and 319 is the gun bleached in white
    .

    COMING UP FROM FLOOR, BACKWARDS.

    They could NOT edit out the gun so they covered it with white and grey. The driver killing Kennedy was always THE TRUTH but was universally ignored and covered-up.
  • 04-13-2011, 08:36 AM
    7forever

    Fake hand at 304 confirmed by nix gif

    http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/
    Everyone can see, even the Kennedy Kooks that Greer's left arm is swiftly jerking over his right shoulder in unison with the headshot. CASE CLOSED, with no challenge from any lone nutter or ct'er like Groden and Marrs. It does NOT matter if 1000 people say a blue sky is black, it will always be blue. Every single person who has seen the NIX gif knows Greer's left arm crosses because it happens.


    NO HAND OR ARM AT 304-305. IT'S OBVIOUS AND CONCLUSIVE.



    THERE IS NO FAKE ARM ATTACHED TO THE FAKE HAND. That is how obvious and pathetic a cover-up it was and is.
  • 04-13-2011, 08:33 AM
    7forever

    The fake reflection over Roy's head is fake

    Mary took her pic at zframe 309 and in it, the fake blob of white is entirely missing from Roy's head because it was added during alteration to cover the gun over Greer's shoulder. Connally's reflection is accurately depicted in both the pic and film for authenticity.




    The fake reflection was NOT added to the nix or muchmore films. THERE IS NO OTHER SIDE TO THE TOP OF THE HEAD.
  • 04-13-2011, 08:32 AM
    7forever

    Greer places gun in left hand at frame 242

    http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/
    FRAME 241 showing both hands close together right before he passes gun.

    Greer passes gun and frame 258 showing covered gun by driver's door.

  • 04-13-2011, 08:30 AM
    7forever
    The driver shot JFK clearly and obviously but the zapruder film needed to be picked apart and analyzed by someone and that someone turned out to be me.
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xes...ville-nix_news

    Nix film close-up shows Greer's left arm crossing over.

    I got this gif from this clip. Start it at 1:09 and see Greer quickly moving his left arm over his shoulder in unison with the headshot. The nix film was not shown close-up but when this sequence is zoomed in on the limo, this whopper is revealed. The goons covered those movements with fakery in the zfilm but could not or didn't bother with the nix film.


    THE FAKE GREY STREAK covered Greer's arm movement in the zfilm and the nix film proves that alteration beyond any doubt. Case Closed, finally. This old copy shows the fake reflection recoiling and pushing back in unison with the headshot very clearly.

    The driver killed Kennedy and the Nix film provides conclusive proof to this inevitable truth.
  • 04-13-2011, 02:46 AM
    Soupnazi630

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Quote Originally Posted by eugene66 View Post
    You are hilarious.

    So if I can go to that circus you call a courtroom and do my smoke and mirrors to convince a jury that I am right THEN it becomes real?? When I get others to believe me too?

    Before that it's not?

    How very scientific of you.

    Dogma rules Woof woof.
    No little fool hilarious is some idiot claiming body language proves anything.

    And so you admit it does not and can now shut up and move on
  • 04-12-2011, 09:20 PM
    eugene66

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Quote Originally Posted by Pavlov's Dog Soup View Post
    Yes you uneducated simpleton it is not evidence to me or to you or to anyone else.

    Body language SUGGESTS something and has to be interpreted which means there can easily be multiple plausible explanations for any bodily gesture or movement.

    It is not a science nor is it evidence of anything that is fact and you are an idiot for claiming otherwise.

    I'll concede however that it is evidence if you can demonstrate one , just ONE case where such evidence was used in a court of law. Such as : the witness is committing perjury because their body language shows they are lying.

    Knock yourself out and demonstrate the veracity and powerful force of body language through just one such example.

    Otherwise shut up and begone you are out of your league
    You are hilarious.

    So if I can go to that circus you call a courtroom and do my smoke and mirrors to convince a jury that I am right THEN it becomes real?? When I get others to believe me too?

    Before that it's not?

    How very scientific of you.

    Dogma rules Woof woof.
  • 04-12-2011, 05:36 PM
    Soupnazi630

    Re: The Men who Killed Kennedy

    Quote Originally Posted by eugene66 View Post
    Yah Soup. Study psychology and how it blends with physiology and biology and then maybe then you might begin to realize why people take body language seriously.

    Oh yeah but I know that not evidence of anything to you right?

    Soups no evidence !!! Hhahahaha!!!
    Yes you uneducated simpleton it is not evidence to me or to you or to anyone else.

    Body language SUGGESTS something and has to be interpreted which means there can easily be multiple plausible explanations for any bodily gesture or movement.

    It is not a science nor is it evidence of anything that is fact and you are an idiot for claiming otherwise.

    I'll concede however that it is evidence if you can demonstrate one , just ONE case where such evidence was used in a court of law. Such as : the witness is committing perjury because their body language shows they are lying.

    Knock yourself out and demonstrate the veracity and powerful force of body language through just one such example.

    Otherwise shut up and begone you are out of your league
This thread has more than 16 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •