report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER
Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Political Chat
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-10-2006, 04:26 AM
themathprof themathprof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
United Nations Human Rights Council

In June 2006, United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan inaugurated the new United Nations Human Rights Council. The new Council is the successor to the now defunct Human Rights Commission, which was often criticized for its membership of some of the world's worst human rights abusers. There were high hopes that the new body would become the world's leading protector of human rights. At the opening ceremony, Annan said:
"This Council represents a great new chance for the United Nations, and for humanity, to renew the struggle for human rights."

As Eye on the UN points out

In Darfur, there are three quarters of a million people beyond humanitarian reach, 2.5 million people displaced by the violence, 385,000 people in immediate risk of starvation, and over two million dead in twenty-two years of violence and deprivation.

But there are no plans for the UN's lead human rights agency to have a special session on Darfur.

a report by Human Rights Watch noted:
In response to a nationwide strike protesting increases in the prices of rice and fuel, Guinea's security forces committed murder, rape, assault and theft against demonstrators and bystanders alike.

To date, the Council has taken no action on human rights abuses in Guinea.



While the Council was meeting, the Toronto Star reported on a study by Human Rights Watch that:

There is "clear and compelling evidence" that Sri Lankan government forces are helping guerrillas to kidnap boys and young men to turn them into child soldiers.

To date, over 65,000 people have been killed in this conflict. The Human Rights Council has never discussed the government abduction of children or the ongoing mass murder in Sri Lanka.


The United Nations Human Rights Council has been in existence for just over six months. During that time, it has ignored terrible human rights abuses around the world.


At the first session of the UNHRC, only one nation was singled out for criticism - Israel. The Council decided that Israel was abusing human rights and, to validate their predetermined conclusion, they ordered an investigation. The Council was very clear in what it expected the investigation to conclude. The Council
...decided to undertake substantive consideration of the human rights violations and implications of the Israeli occupation of Palestine and other occupied Arab territories.
The resolution authorized a special session of the UNHRC to focus solely on Israel and that the issue should be on the agenda of all subsequent UNHRC meetings
Unsurprisingly, at the special session called for by the earlier resolution, Israel was singled out for vehement attack. The Council approved Resolution S-1/1: Human Rights Situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. This resolution, without any mention of historical context, terrorism, or Israeli peace proposals:
� Expressed deep concern at violations of international law by Israel;
� Demanded that Israel end military operations in the occupied Palestinian territories; and
� Urged Israel to release members of the Palestinian Legislative Council (who were also members of the Hamas terrorist organization)
In August, following Hezbollah's unprovoked attack on Israel, the UNHRC decided to host another special session. Yet, the Council was not interested in how the conflict started. Instead, it created a commission of inquiry to review the situation but expressly forbid this commission from investigating the actions of Hezbollah. Resolution S-2/1 authorizing the investigation mandated that only certain aspects of the conflict would be examined. These aspects were defined as:
"1) investigating the systematic targeting and killings of civilians by Israel in Lebanon; (b) examining the types of weapons used by Israel and their conformity with international law; and (c) assessing the extent and deadly impact of Israeli attacks on human life, property, critical infrastructure and the environment."
The report noted that:
It is not for the Commission to comment on the political-legal context of the adoption of resolution S-2/1, nor to make judgment on the content of its mandate. It is clear that the mandate of the Commission has limits...and does not allow for a full examination of all of the aspects of the conflict....The Commission is not entitled, even if it had wished, to construe it as equally authorizing the investigation of the actions by Hezbollah in Israel. To do so would exceed the Commission�s interpretative function and would be to usurp the Council�s powers.
The UNHRC deliberately prevented a fair examination of the conflict. Any reasonable investigation would have noted that:
� The conflict was initiated when Israeli soldiers were killed and kidnapped on Israeli soil.
� Thousands of rockets were deliberately fired at civilian areas in Israel.
� The toll in terms of lives, destroyed homes, and damage to the Israeli economy due to the war was immense.
While ignoring any information from the government of Israel, the UNHRC accepted as fact a list of 56 "massacres by the Israeli army" from the Lebanese government. (Annex VI).
On November 15, 19 Palestinian civilians were killed when an Israeli artillery shell veered off course, missing its intended military target. As HonestReporting pointed out, this terrible tragedy occurred due to an unintended accident. The government of Israel apologized immediately and pointed out that if the Palestinians had stopped firing rockets on Sderot, this accident could not have taken place. Yet, that same day, the UNHRC leapt into action to hold yet another special session and pass another resolution condemning Israel. Once again, there was no mention at all of the constant firing of rockets on Israeli civilian areas. There was no mention of Gilad Shalit, still held captive in Gaza. The Council provided no context at all to describe the incident.
The Council "expressed its shock at the horror of Israeli killing of Palestinian civilians in Beit Hanoun and called for bringing the perpetrators thereof to justice". The Council decided to send a fact finding mission to "make recommendations on ways and means to protect Palestinian civilians against further Israeli assaults." No mention was made of protecting Israeli civilians from further assault.
The United Nations Human Rights Council has been in existence for just over six months. During that time, it has ignored terrible human rights abuses around the world. It has become an organization dedicated solely to condemning and vilifying the State of Israel. As such, it lacks credibility and should not be seen by the media as a credible source on the subject of human rights. If you see your media referring to the Council without some background, let them know the facts.


Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.N. Human Rights Council to Take Aim at U.S. DoubleP Political Chat 48 11-07-2010 04:09 PM
What the United Nations Did This Week pwrone Political Chat 0 08-25-2010 06:20 PM
The United Nations of America BVR USA Liaison Political Chat 4 09-04-2007 01:23 PM
UN Watch blasts UN Human Rights Council Grim17 Political Chat 19 04-04-2007 05:44 AM
DDT and United Nations cranston36 Science Scams 11 12-21-2006 05:43 AM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the Users own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.