report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER
Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #145  
Old 09-27-2011, 01:54 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and only 20 percent saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane.



Reply With Quote

  #146  
Old 09-27-2011, 05:42 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by BullsLawDan View Post
You're not understanding my question (obviously).
Why would they bother "faking" the plane crashes if they used explosives to destroy WTC? Why not just use the explosives and tell people Al-Queda planted explosives?
Like most 9/11 deniers, your preposterous theory requires massive amounts of unneeded complexity that would surely sink any conspiracy. Utterly ridiculous.
Why would they bother using real planes when they did not have to? There were no plane crashes and no evidence that can hold up to even minor scrutiny. For T2 they used a ufo packed with explosives and told americans that Al-Queda planned and executed an impossible hijacking terrorist myth which was sold to the masses by way of five participating TV networks.

Like most 9/11 denialists, your preposterous government conspiracy theory requires a massive level of complexity that would surely sink any mythical conspiracy. Your attempt at truth suppression is Utterly ridiculous.

Reply With Quote

  #147  
Old 09-27-2011, 06:32 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
There were around 117 eyewitness accounts and only 20 percent saw a plane. Only 8% saw and heard a plane.

There were 1000's eyewitnesses. Hell, there were at least 80 people right around me....who heard and saw exactly what I did.

The idea that because there only appear to be 177 eyewitnesses accounts....does not mean that is all there is. There are 10x that many like me...who were never interviewed or gave testimony other than to family and friends.

So, your numbers are bullshit and have no significance.
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #148  
Old 09-27-2011, 06:38 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
Why would they bother using real planes when they did not have to? There were no plane crashes and no evidence that can hold up to even minor scrutiny. For T2 they used a ufo packed with explosives and told americans that Al-Queda planned and executed an impossible hijacking terrorist myth which was sold to the masses by way of five participating TV networks.

Like most 9/11 denialists, your preposterous government conspiracy theory requires a massive level of complexity that would surely sink any mythical conspiracy. Your attempt at truth suppression is Utterly ridiculous.
Funny how you dismiss the plane parts found at and around WTC as though if you don't acknowledge it, you don't have to address the issue.

Stupid people like you are always trying to sound like you know something you don't. Here's an idea....try debunking your bullshit and see how easy it is to do. See how your "no plane" wet dream can't stand up on it's own.

Again, those of us who actually eyewitnessed the plane crash know you just fucking moron who waste the air you breath.
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #149  
Old 09-27-2011, 08:29 AM
yyy123 yyy123 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,071
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
Final proof that two flight paths were aired on 911
No... you are incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
View from the North looking South. Camera is using a 'long' lens or 'telephoto' lense. That type of lens compresses distance, removing any indication of distance between points in frame.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
Shot taken from the West looking East. Camera is focused on the towers not 175 which is seen coming out of it's arc and descending. Similar to the above .gif.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
175 filmed from a lower angle
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
Same as above... just looks clearer.

None of the above clips are proof of different flight paths as all three show the same flight path shot from different angles.

Reply With Quote

  #150  
Old 09-27-2011, 10:03 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Oh sure...you and your silly "depth of field" argument! Pfffft!
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #151  
Old 09-27-2011, 10:47 AM
yyy123 yyy123 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,071
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Oh sure...you and your silly "depth of field" argument! Pfffft!
meh... he won't believe it anyway.

Compressed perspective:
Quote:

In addition to bringing the world up close, telephoto lenses also alter the perspective of your scene by compressing and altering the apparent distance and size relationships between different objects in your frame. This effect is what makes backgrounds loom larger than life behind the subject and what gives classic telephoto shots that flattened two-dimensional look.
Of course, environment can also be a factor in collapsing depth of field too.


Notice... no reference points to help the viewer determine scale or depth... just like 711's 'dive-bomber' photo. It is a descending arc flight path as proven by the other clips. There are no different flight paths... he has shown the same flight path in all his clips.


Last edited by yyy123 : 09-27-2011 at 10:56 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #152  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:03 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
No... you are incorrect.

View from the North looking South. Camera is using a 'long' lens or 'telephoto' lense. That type of lens compresses distance, removing any indication of distance between points in frame.

Shot taken from the West looking East. Camera is focused on the towers not 175 which is seen coming out of it's arc and descending. Similar to the above .gif.

175 filmed from a lower angle

Same as above... just looks clearer.

None of the above clips are proof of different flight paths as all three show the same flight path shot from different angles.
No, you are defeated. Nothing from the west ever appears above and behind the towers that remains in sight, besides the divebomber bullshit myth. The buildings are a fixed landmark that make it simple and irrefutable.

Reply With Quote

  #153  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:08 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
meh... he won't believe it anyway.

Compressed perspective:


Of course, environment can also be a factor in collapsing depth of field too.




Notice... no reference points to help the viewer determine scale or depth... just like 711's 'dive-bomber' photo. It is a descending arc flight path as proven by the other clips. There are no different flight paths... he has shown the same flight path in all his clips.
The west morph is low and coming from the west, you dumb ****.LOL The divebomber on its own is absurd. You can't have it both ways, only in your deluded of mind of denial. You are defeated and debunked without doing any work.

Reply With Quote

  #154  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:10 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Oh sure...you and your silly "depth of field" argument! Pfffft!
Oh sure...you and your silly "dodging of reality" argument! Pfffft!

Reply With Quote

  #155  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:13 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
meh... he won't believe it anyway.

Compressed perspective:


Of course, environment can also be a factor in collapsing depth of field too.




Notice... no reference points to help the viewer determine scale or depth... just like 711's 'dive-bomber' photo. It is a descending arc flight path as proven by the other clips. There are no different flight paths... he has shown the same flight path in all his clips.
It's not my divebomber you fucking jackass. It's one of many fake flight paths provided by media outlets that is confirmed impossible on in its own.

Reply With Quote

  #156  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:20 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Funny how you dismiss the plane parts found at and around WTC as though if you don't acknowledge it, you don't have to address the issue.

Stupid people like you are always trying to sound like you know something you don't. Here's an idea....try debunking your bullshit and see how easy it is to do. See how your "no plane" wet dream can't stand up on it's own.

Again, those of us who actually eyewitnessed the plane crash know you just fucking moron who waste the air you breath.
It's normal how you dismiss that no plane is seen in 2 live footage clips as though you don't acknowledge it, you don't have to address the issue because you are a dumb **** troll.

Stupid people like you are always trying to sound like you know something you don't. Here's an idea....try debunking your bullshit and see how easy it is to do. See how your plane theory wet dream can't stand up on it's own.

Again, those of us who actually deal in reality know that no plane hit T2. You are a fucking moron who wastes the air she breathes.

Reply With Quote

  #157  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:30 AM
yyy123 yyy123 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,071
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

I know a bit about photography & digital graphics. LY is a professional in that field.

I knew 711 would deny the evidence of his posted clips... he usually does.

It looks like I hit a nerve. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of photography and that can see the clips were shot from different angles knows 711's imagination has gotten away from him. He doesn't even make a plausible hypothesis.



Last edited by yyy123 : 09-27-2011 at 11:34 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #158  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:35 AM
yyy123 yyy123 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,071
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7forever View Post
It's not my divebomber you fucking jackass. It's one of many fake flight paths provided by media outlets that is confirmed impossible on in its own.
That's what you've called it in this forum... so it's yours.

You'll be posting your 'Pee Wee Herman like' response before too long.




Last edited by yyy123 : 09-27-2011 at 11:44 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #159  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:48 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
I know a bit about photography & digital graphics. LY is a professional in that field.

I knew 711 would deny the evidence of his posted clips... he usually does.

It looks like I hit a nerve. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of photography and that can see the clips were shot from different angles knows 711's imagination has gotten away from him. He doesn't even make a plausible hypothesis.

You didn't hit anything but your head. What hypothesis have you offered besides trolling and making up bullshit?

You simply cannot do anything but avoid reality. How can two live clips not show a plane if there was really a plane? Two spooked women and no plane. You are stuck in reality but grasp onto fantansy.

Reply With Quote

  #160  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:52 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
I know a bit about photography & digital graphics. LY is a professional in that field.

Reply With Quote

  #161  
Old 09-27-2011, 11:56 AM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Re: A fake plane was added for south tower explosi

Quote:
Originally Posted by yyy123 View Post
That's what you've called it in this forum... so it's yours.

You'll be posting your 'Pee Wee Herman like' response before too long.
That was named by youtubers, from apparently the official flight path in the report that states it dropped 10k feet or more. You don't what you're talking about.

Reply With Quote

  #162  
Old 09-27-2011, 12:19 PM
7forever's Avatar
7forever 7forever is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 903
Defeating My Very First Troll On Scam.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Your "Orb" is a helicopter....and it flies in and out of frame all throughout the video.
That helicopter you wrongly identified was the bomb that exploded the second tower, you assinine schmuck. It never made it east of the towers.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUGTr...8D8AE&index=22



Last edited by 7forever : 09-27-2011 at 12:21 PM.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UA 175: Who created fake footage from south view? 7forever Conspiracy Theories 61 12-27-2011 01:29 AM
First teen added to Crime Stoppers 10 Most Wanted SnappyDan Political Chat 9 05-26-2011 12:54 PM
Plane crash kills 158 in south India Yeah Well Fine Then Political Chat 18 05-23-2010 03:24 AM
Oil rig explosion..what the media 3 didn't say. danrush1966 Political Chat 8 05-02-2010 06:19 PM
Albania protests over Belgrade embassy explosion sojustask Political Chat 0 01-03-2006 10:34 PM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the Userís own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.