report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER  

Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-01-2010, 07:56 PM
truthufo truthufo is offline
I am new at Scam.com
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than BS.

Its going to take more than the Opinion of a Numb Skull to change the Facks of JVB.

Iíve Personally spoken with JVB and I believe her. Now I read this sheet below at this link

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/judyth.htm

I have a few Problems with what this guy is implying. FIRST He says by 63 There was no mice in Ferries apartment. My foot I quote as AFTER What 9 some YEARS after the Death was when Jim Garrison began his investigating the New orlins connection right?
I may be wrong but when David Ferry was Killed was that not during JGs investigation 9 some YEARS After 63? And again I may be wrong its been a while since I researched JFK but after DFs Murder did Jim Garrison not find Test Mice in his apartment?
I could be wrong perhaps I am simply Mistaken and it was right in 63 when Jim Garrison began his investigation and questioned David Ferry getting Him killed but the Bottom Line is or should I say the FACT is that YES there was many MICE in DFs apartment long after 63..
So thatís the first LIE in this guys propaganda. Next is he says how the CIA Would have Used High ranking Scientists and would use toxins why would they need cancer research..
Guy Obviously knows Dic about the CIA. Iíve been researching the CIA Most my Life and absolutely they would use Low level people its kind of like anyone breaking the law like the CIA often does. Low Profile. So say they use Einstein who is famous won a Nobel prize. Yeah like that is Low key right?
Seriously.. And as for using cancer Absolutely Possible as cancer would have had NOBODY to blame as a poison would have made his death MURDER not a Natural Death. Cancer would have made nobody to blame which is what the CIA needed.
This Guy just speaks out his Rump. Iíd believe him if he had any actual apposing facts to make Judith Vary Baker look like she Lied. But he has not stated one single fact just his Opinions on how HE Believes the CIA would have done things.
I for one know a great deal about how the CIA does things and I hands down believe Judith Vary Baker.
 
 "Judythís supposed encounter with Michaelson would have taken place when she was a first semester sophomore in high school. Given the CIAís ability to recruit top-notch Ph.D. talent, itís a bit odd to be told that they were scouting high school students."

Not if they had plans of KILLING Her after her job was complete. And NEEDED reasonable Deniability. Use a "Top Notch Scientist" And when he testifies to his accounts its a little hard to claim he is a Liar.

Use Univ Labs and its a Lot more dificult to Deny everything. This guy is trying to develope reasoning to CIA. If there was any spacific manner in which the CIA worked than they would then be Predictable right?

To be Unpredictable you need to work in ways in which people would NEVER expect you to do. For the very example of this guy telling us all the reasons Judyth is a Liar. Is EXACTLY Why the CIA does what they do because Later some guy like him can raise all these very reasonable Points making Judyth look like she is a Loony Bin..

Gee but to those who think like the CIA it makes perfect sense...


"The notion of injecting Castro with cancer cells is pretty far-fetched. Knocking out his immune system would have resulted in his death without any additional ingredient in the ďcocktail.Ē "

How does this guy Know this? Is he a Biologist or rocket scientist?


Im not even going to BOTHER Reading or arguing the rest of this dip dorks Opinions because that is all it is the Opinion lacking any facts..

I mean if this Guy could kame a statement about how Injecting Castro with Cancer cells woudl Kill him and show some research, some Proof to what he is telling us than Ide take his statements into consideration but he spouts his mouth off and does not back up a single shread of his words with Cold Hard Facts..

Sorry But Its going to take a Real researcher to debunk Judyth Vary Baker..


Try again....



Ide do it but I believe Judyth...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-01-2010, 08:43 PM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by truthufo View Post
Its going to take more than the Opinion of a Numb Skull to change the Facks of JVB.

Iíve Personally spoken with JVB and I believe her. Now I read this sheet below at this link

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/judyth.htm

I have a few Problems with what this guy is implying. FIRST He says by 63 There was no mice in Ferries apartment. My foot I quote as AFTER What 9 some YEARS after the Death was when Jim Garrison began his investigating the New orlins connection right?
I may be wrong but when David Ferry was Killed was that not during JGs investigation 9 some YEARS After 63? And again I may be wrong its been a while since I researched JFK but after DFs Murder did Jim Garrison not find Test Mice in his apartment?
I could be wrong perhaps I am simply Mistaken and it was right in 63 when Jim Garrison began his investigation and questioned David Ferry getting Him killed but the Bottom Line is or should I say the FACT is that YES there was many MICE in DFs apartment long after 63..
So thatís the first LIE in this guys propaganda. Next is he says how the CIA Would have Used High ranking Scientists and would use toxins why would they need cancer research..
Guy Obviously knows Dic about the CIA. Iíve been researching the CIA Most my Life and absolutely they would use Low level people its kind of like anyone breaking the law like the CIA often does. Low Profile. So say they use Einstein who is famous won a Nobel prize. Yeah like that is Low key right?
Seriously.. And as for using cancer Absolutely Possible as cancer would have had NOBODY to blame as a poison would have made his death MURDER not a Natural Death. Cancer would have made nobody to blame which is what the CIA needed.
This Guy just speaks out his Rump. Iíd believe him if he had any actual apposing facts to make Judith Vary Baker look like she Lied. But he has not stated one single fact just his Opinions on how HE Believes the CIA would have done things.
I for one know a great deal about how the CIA does things and I hands down believe Judith Vary Baker.
 
 "Judythís supposed encounter with Michaelson would have taken place when she was a first semester sophomore in high school. Given the CIAís ability to recruit top-notch Ph.D. talent, itís a bit odd to be told that they were scouting high school students."

Not if they had plans of KILLING Her after her job was complete. And NEEDED reasonable Deniability. Use a "Top Notch Scientist" And when he testifies to his accounts its a little hard to claim he is a Liar.

Use Univ Labs and its a Lot more dificult to Deny everything. This guy is trying to develope reasoning to CIA. If there was any spacific manner in which the CIA worked than they would then be Predictable right?

To be Unpredictable you need to work in ways in which people would NEVER expect you to do. For the very example of this guy telling us all the reasons Judyth is a Liar. Is EXACTLY Why the CIA does what they do because Later some guy like him can raise all these very reasonable Points making Judyth look like she is a Loony Bin..

Gee but to those who think like the CIA it makes perfect sense...


"The notion of injecting Castro with cancer cells is pretty far-fetched. Knocking out his immune system would have resulted in his death without any additional ingredient in the ďcocktail.Ē "

How does this guy Know this? Is he a Biologist or rocket scientist?


Im not even going to BOTHER Reading or arguing the rest of this dip dorks Opinions because that is all it is the Opinion lacking any facts..

I mean if this Guy could kame a statement about how Injecting Castro with Cancer cells woudl Kill him and show some research, some Proof to what he is telling us than Ide take his statements into consideration but he spouts his mouth off and does not back up a single shread of his words with Cold Hard Facts..

Sorry But Its going to take a Real researcher to debunk Judyth Vary Baker..


Try again....



Ide do it but I believe Judyth...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No offense but I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Your post rambles and makes little sense to me.

One little part I noticed is your claim that using cancer as a poison is absolutely possible.

In fact it is absolutely IMPOSSIBLE. Cancer can not be injected into another person. Cancer is your body turning on itself and is in no way contagious. Obviously some things lead to greater risk of cancer such as smoking but you still cannot give cancer to another person.

I admit I do not know why this is true but any doctor or med student will tell you it is true and maybe explain why. Surely any assassin seeking to use poison would bother to learn this fact after all you have to learn what poisons to use from someplace.



Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 11-02-2010, 03:57 AM
danrush1966 danrush1966 is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,846
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

You know, I often wonder if this was a government conspiracy or some bigger interluken group of gangsters...

why would they use a fucken rifle? Why not a sub-machine gun? Why not a hand granade or a fucken bomb? You want to make sure the president is absolutely fucken dead right?

And why didn't the conspirators make sure they killed every last Kennedy supporter in the government?

Conspiracy is absolute B.S.

Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 11-06-2010, 09:30 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by danrush1966 View Post
why would they use a fucken rifle? Why not a sub-machine gun? Why not a hand granade or a fucken bomb?.

You want to make sure the president is absolutely fucken dead right?.
Errrrrrr, errrrrrr... Not the sharpest tool in the box are we?.

We have a dead president you shmuck.... & they made sure that day they got the job done.



Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 11-08-2010, 10:42 AM
danrush1966 danrush1966 is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,846
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
We have a dead president you shmuck
By a mentally imballanced socialist named Lee Harvey Oswald.

you failed...case is closed.

Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 11-08-2010, 05:37 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by danrush1966 View Post
you failed...case is closed.
You make absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Quote:
Originally Posted by danrush1966 View Post
"why would they use a fucken rifle? Why not a sub-machine gun? Why not a hand granade or a fucken bomb? You want to make sure the president is absolutely fucken dead right?"
Are you really that stupid?.

They just wanted JFK dead & nobody else. There was no reason to kill the Connally's, secret service, Jackie etc using grenades, bombs, sub machine guns etc because almost every occupant of the car, if not all of them would have been killed.

They just wanted JFK out of office, so his controversial policies could be overturned. Lets face it, Jacqueline had a motive or two with his womanizing antics.


Last edited by $ick3nin.vend3tta : 11-09-2010 at 03:45 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 11-08-2010, 06:01 PM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
You make absolutely no sense whatsoever.



Are you really that stupid?.

They just wanted JFK dead & nobody else. There was no reason to kill the Connally's, secret service, Jackie etc using grenades, bombs, sub machine guns etc because almost every occupant of the car, if not all of them would have been killed.

They just wanted JFK out of office, so his controversial policies could be overturned. Lets face it, Jacqueline had a motive or two with his womanizing antics.

Is that love?.
The only stupidity is the claim that THEY ( whoever they are ) killed JFK.

Oswald killed him.

Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 11-08-2010, 06:21 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
Oswald killed him.
Can you show me any conclusive proof or evidence to suggest this?.

Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 11-08-2010, 07:20 PM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
Can you show me any conclusive proof or evidence to suggest this?.
Already have you simply pretended it was dreamed up by Co-conspirators.

Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 11-08-2010, 07:31 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
Already have you simply pretended it was dreamed up by Co-conspirators.
Could you please link me to it?.

I must have missed it.

Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 11-09-2010, 04:57 AM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
Could you please link me to it?.

I must have missed it.
No you simply commented on it and then ignored it.

Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 11-09-2010, 03:44 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
No!. you simply commented on it and then ignored it.
I'm putting 2+2 together. I make it 4.

Thankyou for the evidence.

Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 11-09-2010, 05:39 PM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
I'm putting 2+2 together. I make it 4.

Thankyou for the evidence.
Actually you are putting 2 and 2 together and ending up with zero.

Instead of accepting physical real evidence you cling to dope induced nonsense such as secret compartments, fake blood canisters and guns in a video which show no gun.

Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 11-10-2010, 02:21 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
Instead of accepting physical real evidence.
Hard to accept when you believe in a blatant conspiracy to have Kennedy removed from office & literally his entire policy structure being overturned in one phail swoop.

The entire work of one man on his lonesome?.

They needed Kennedy dead. You need more options than the sixth-floor of the School Book Depository window let me tell you to make sure this job gets done.


Last edited by $ick3nin.vend3tta : 11-10-2010 at 05:49 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 11-11-2010, 05:14 AM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
Hard to accept when you believe in a blatant conspiracy to have Kennedy removed from office & literally his entire policy structure being overturned in one phail swoop.

The entire work of one man on his lonesome?.

They needed Kennedy dead. You need more options than the sixth-floor of the School Book Depository window let me tell you to make sure this job gets done.
There is no evidence of such a conspiracy.

Every president has political enemies and opposition who would like to see his policies change.

This is not evidence of a conspiracy however.

IF this lame theory were true many more presidents would have been killed.

Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old 11-11-2010, 08:40 PM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
There is no evidence of such a conspiracy.
There is evidence. As soon as they got him out of office they overturned his controversial policies.

Reply With Quote

  #17  
Old 11-12-2010, 02:04 AM
Soupnazi630 Soupnazi630 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,061
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ick3nin.vend3tta View Post
There is evidence. As soon as they got him out of office they overturned his controversial policies.
This is not evidence of a conspiracy to remove him.

Once again you ignore that every president changes the polices of his predecessor.

This is normal not a conspiracy.

Reply With Quote

  #18  
Old 11-12-2010, 03:22 AM
$ick3nin.vend3tta's Avatar
$ick3nin.vend3tta $ick3nin.vend3tta is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 715
Re: Judyth Vary Baker, Its going to take more than

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
This is not evidence of a conspiracy to remove him.
Coincidental?.

Think not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soupnazi630 View Post
Once again you ignore that every president changes the polices of his predecessor.
But when Kennedy got into office, Vice Johnson (right-hand man) was supportive of his policy structure.

The elite didn't like that.



Last edited by $ick3nin.vend3tta : 11-12-2010 at 03:31 AM.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
jazz Chet Baker Tulip I Love 9 03-26-2013 01:14 PM
That lying bitch Judith Baker danrush1966 Conspiracy Theories 0 10-29-2010 03:47 AM
Watch out for Gary Baker - Jem Publishing share21 Internet Scams 2 06-18-2010 06:20 PM
Oswald's Girlfriend Judy Baker eflteacher Conspiracy Theories 8 10-24-2008 06:49 PM
Mag-lev Investment Program/inquiry/larry Baker razor78 Investment Scams 5 04-30-2008 03:52 AM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the Userís own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 AM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.