report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER
Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #37  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:21 AM
EDECO79 EDECO79 is offline
Newbie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Even polio has been challenged. Have a read.

THE POLIO VACCINE MYTH

by Christopher Kent, D.C., FCCI

March 2000. The Chiropractic Journal:

When questions of vaccine efficacy have arisen, I've often been asked, "But what about polio? I remember the braces, the iron lungs, the crippled children. They disappeared after the Salk vaccine." The error is confusing correlation with cause and effect. The incidence of polio was decreasing before the Salk vaccine was administered. Following the administration of the Salk vaccine, there was an increase in the number of polio cases, followed by a continuation of the natural decline that pre-dated the vaccine. Proponents of polio vaccine conveniently ignore previous polio epidemics, where the disease all but disappeared in the absence of a vaccine.

Let's look at some polio statistics. In 1942, the epidemic of the first half of the century subsided, and there were fewer than 5,000 cases of polio in the United States. Around 1948, the number of polio cases began to soar. Interestingly, this is about the time the pertussis vaccine appeared on the public health scene. Polio reached a high in 1949, and then began its natural decline. In 1949 there were nearly 43,000 cases of polio. By 1951 the number had dropped to below 28,000. Following a government-subsidized study of polio vaccine, the number soared to an all-time high of more than 55,000 cases. A "bad batch" of vaccine produced by Cutter Laboratories was deemed the cause of many cases of polio. Fortunately, better quality control procedures governing the inactivation of the virus were initiated, and the number of cases continued to decline. Of course, the vaccine got the credit -- not nature.

An even more interesting abuse of statistics becomes apparent when perusing polio statistics. The diagnostic criteria and reporting procedures for the disease changed. In the 1950s, the sophisticated virological techniques of today did not exist. And the technology that existed was rarely available to practicing physicians. Therefore, most diagnoses were based upon clinical observation, not sophisticated virological studies. Since polio was epidemic, most physicians were cavalier in making a diagnosis of "non-paralytic poliomyelitis" in children presenting with vague symptoms of muscle aches, malaise, and fever. Since polio was "going around", such children must have had polio. Today, they might be diagnosed as having influenza, again in the absence of laboratory confirmation. And like influenza today, most cases of polio were self-limited. The cases progressing to the paralytic form got the publicity.

Interestingly, as the number of polio cases decreased, the number of meningitis cases increased. Consider these figures from the Los Angeles County Health Index: Morbidity and Mortality, Reportable Diseases (listed here by date, followed by number of cases of a)viral or aseptic meningitis, b)polio):
- Jul 1955 a)50 b)273
- Jul 1961 a)161 b)65
- Jul 1963 a)151 b)31
- Sep 1966 a)256 b)5 (5 year median)
- Oct 1966 a)312 b)3

The authors of this publication offer an explanation for this rather strange inversion of figures: "Most cases reported prior to July 1, 1958 as non-paralytic poliomyelitis are now reported as viral or aseptic meningitis." In another masterful example of faulty reasoning, it was concluded that since the vaccine had "wiped out polio", children with similar symptoms must have something else -- meningitis!

The polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk was a killed virus vaccine. The oral polio vaccine developed by Albert Sabin and until recently used routinely in the United States, is a live virus vaccine. Public health authorities acknowledge the fact the it can and does produce paralytic polio in a small number of recipients. Yet, they promoted it over the safer Salk vaccine because it is easier to "sell" parents on a one-time regimen of an oral vaccine over an injected vaccine where "booster" doses are recommended. The oral vaccine is also said to confer "herd immunity". Vaccine recipients infect unvaccinated persons, thus increasing the immunity of the "herd".

What is the risk of contracting naturally occurring polio? According to Jonas Salk, the current live virus polio vaccine developed by Dr. Albert Sabin was "the principal if not the sole cause of the 140 vaccine cases reported in the U.S. since 1961. At the present time the risk of acquiring polio from the live virus vaccine is greater than from naturally occurring viruses."

In summary:
1)The number of polio cases was declining before the widespread administration of the Salk vaccine.
2)Cases which had previously been reported as polio are now reported as meningitis.
3)The risk of contracting polio from the live virus vaccine is greater than the risk of acquiring the disease from naturally occurring viruses.

Today, medical authorities are recommending a return to the injectable Salk vaccine. However, the live virus Sabin vaccine will probably still be used in developing countries.

A chilling legacy of the live polio vaccine may be the virus associated with AIDS. Edward Hooper's book "The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS" suggests that AIDS may be the result of a live virus polio vaccine administered in Africa in the 1950s. According to Hooper, the vaccine may have been contaminated with a simian (monkey) virus. This virus is thought to have evolved into the HIV virus.

Although the theory is controversial, it demonstrates how the potential risk of vaccines may not become evident until decades after their administration.

References
1. Kent C, Gentempo P: "Immunizations: fact, myth, and speculation." International Review of Chiropractic. November/December 1990.
2. Hooper, E: "The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS." New York. Little, Brown and Company. 1999.


Reply With Quote

  #38  
Old 02-16-2012, 06:23 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Sooooooo......

Quote:
Dr. Kent is a 1973 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic, and a Diplomate and Fellow of the ICA College of Chiropractic Imaging. He was named the International Chiropractors Association (ICA) “Chiropractic Researcher of the Year” in 1991, and he was the recipient of that honor from World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA) in 1994.

Dr. Kent was also selected “Chiropractor of the Year” in 1998 by the International Chiropractors Association. He is the Main Representative of the WCA to the Department of Public Information, affiliated with the United Nations, and former chair of the NGO Health Committee.

He is the author of articles in peer-reviewed and popular journals, a contributor to textbooks, and has served on the postgraduate faculties of several chiropractic colleges.

Dr. Kent is co-founder of the Chiropractic Leadership Alliance (CLA). An attorney as well as a chiropractor, Dr. Kent is an active member of the State Bar of California, and is admitted as an attorney of the United States District Court, Southern District of California
You believe being a Chiropracter....makes him an authority on Immunization Science???
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #39  
Old 02-20-2012, 05:56 AM
EDECO79 EDECO79 is offline
Newbie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Appeal to authority fallacy of logic (or lack of authority in this instance). Just because Dr. Kent is a chiropractor doesn't invalidate his arguments. Disprove it through counter-arguments (if you can). But as you will find out if you do some research is that the data from this article isn't unusual. The evidence isn't as clear as the pro-vaccine crowd seems to think it is. It all started with smallpox and the evidence of the vaccine for that is not good, to say the least. From 1840-1867 small pox deaths in England had dropped from 300 per million to 100 per million. Then in 1867 here comes the smallpox vaccine and the numbers started climbing again (all the way up to 400 deaths per million in 1871-2 before getting back down to 100 per million late in the decade). There is evidence that populations go through infection cycles and they eventually go away regardless of vaccines (and there also is evidence that vaccines infect people with the very disease they are supposed to protect against, which happened with smallpox and measles, and several flu studies have correlated this too). The more you dig up on vaccines the more you see that they are either ineffective at best or cause far more harm than good at worst. But since vaccines are a multi-billion dollar business, all the contrary evidence is swept under the rug. And then it doesn't stop there. Vaccine makers infiltrate government and get laws passed in their favor (this JUST happened in Colorado, where the Board of Health mandated flu shots for all health care workers, and at least one of the members has direct ties to Novartis; a troubling, but quite common, display of conflict of interest). The CDC is essentially run by these corporations and thus their absurdly aggressive vaccine agenda. And yet the gullible public believes vaccines are based on good science and line up like sheep and get injected without a second thought. I think the latest count is 73 vaccines for kids aged 0-18 now recommended by the CDC. The situation is completely out of hand. And the mandates are a clear violation of civil rights (if YOUR body isn't yours, we might as well just toss out the entire Constitution because it has little meaning then anyway, and indeed, it hasn't for decades). The best vaccines can do is provide antibodies against a disease, and when the antibodies drop in count the body is vulnerable once again since life long immunity is not achieved (whereas immunity is achieved if people get viruses the way we got them for millions of years of evolution...I am always in disbelief that arrogant doctors think they have bested an incredibly complex immune system with these vaccines, and I have little doubt vaccines will come back to haunt us all eventually when 9 out 10 people's immune systems are messed up...hell, this might have happened already since auto-immune diseases are exploding in the population and it is KNOWN that vaccines can trigger auto-immunity...there are certainly other factors involved, like bad diet, but how are vaccines not being considered?). And think on this: Would you rather get the flu or an auto-immune disease (even if it is 1 in 100)? The flu is most dangerous when people fail to seek emergency treatment (IV fluids, specifically). Is that really such a risk for the VAST majority of people? No. But what are the risks of these vaccines that contain dangerous adjuvants (mercury or aluminum) and other ingredients that can have side-effects too? Maybe for certain diseases YOU would rather risk some vaccine side-effects than the disease. But the common flu? Or what about chicken pox? We have a ticking time bomb with this vaccine since those vaccinated DO NOT have real immunity and if they fail to get their 'boosters' every decade for LIFE they risk getting shingles which is way worse than just getting the disease as a kid and being itchy for week and then being done with it forever. Same with the rotavirus. Kids get diarrhea for a few days then they have immunity forever (if the kid is really ill, get them an IV to avoid dehydration and the risk of dying is almost zilch). Nope, now they get the worthless vaccine (which has made $30 million for Paul Offit) and risk getting the disease later in life when, again like chicken pox, the symptoms can be much more dangerous. What about HPV? Are you aware 99% of people clear the HPV viruses to a dormant state within two years? Have you seen how many girls have been crippled for life by Gardisil? Is it really worth it? And big pharma wants it mandated of course (for boys too!). Oh, and the idea that it prevents cancer is still a hypothesis (there is no proof because the vaccine is a mere 5 years old and data like that takes decades to amass). So then, for the pro-vaccine crowd I recommend they do their own research (and not just on the CDC website, although even their own 'evidence' will leave you underwhelmed if you read through it and look at the study parameters). Then, if you still decide you are pro-vaccine, great, you have the right to get yourself vaccinated. But then stop there please and stop harassing those of us who choose otherwise (and trying to usurp our personal rights by mandating vaccines through unconstitutional laws all under the guise of the 'greater good'). And please realize it is a slippery slope when you support mandates of vaccines or anything else really. The government will never stop meddling in your business if you let them start. Salt, sugar, caffeine, whatever is evil at moment. They have already made a HUGE mess trying to stop drugs. Just leave people alone, even if you disagree with them.



Reply With Quote

  #40  
Old 02-20-2012, 07:16 AM
nomaxim's Avatar
nomaxim nomaxim is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Stow, OH SOL III
Posts: 2,517
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

I'm sure not going too even attempt to read that jumbled mess.

Paragraph (Wiki).


Reply With Quote

  #41  
Old 02-21-2012, 09:19 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDECO79 View Post
Appeal to authority fallacy of logic (or lack of authority in this instance). Just because Dr. Kent is a chiropractor doesn't invalidate his arguments. Disprove it through counter-arguments (if you can). But as you will find out if you do some research is that the data from this article isn't unusual. The evidence isn't as clear as the pro-vaccine crowd seems to think it is. It all started with smallpox and the evidence of the vaccine for that is not good, to say the least. From 1840-1867 small pox deaths in England had dropped from 300 per million to 100 per million. Then in 1867 here comes the smallpox vaccine and the numbers started climbing again (all the way up to 400 deaths per million in 1871-2 before getting back down to 100 per million late in the decade). There is evidence that populations go through infection cycles and they eventually go away regardless of vaccines (and there also is evidence that vaccines infect people with the very disease they are supposed to protect against, which happened with smallpox and measles, and several flu studies have correlated this too). The more you dig up on vaccines the more you see that they are either ineffective at best or cause far more harm than good at worst. But since vaccines are a multi-billion dollar business, all the contrary evidence is swept under the rug. And then it doesn't stop there. Vaccine makers infiltrate government and get laws passed in their favor (this JUST happened in Colorado, where the Board of Health mandated flu shots for all health care workers, and at least one of the members has direct ties to Novartis; a troubling, but quite common, display of conflict of interest). The CDC is essentially run by these corporations and thus their absurdly aggressive vaccine agenda. And yet the gullible public believes vaccines are based on good science and line up like sheep and get injected without a second thought. I think the latest count is 73 vaccines for kids aged 0-18 now recommended by the CDC. The situation is completely out of hand. And the mandates are a clear violation of civil rights (if YOUR body isn't yours, we might as well just toss out the entire Constitution because it has little meaning then anyway, and indeed, it hasn't for decades). The best vaccines can do is provide antibodies against a disease, and when the antibodies drop in count the body is vulnerable once again since life long immunity is not achieved (whereas immunity is achieved if people get viruses the way we got them for millions of years of evolution...I am always in disbelief that arrogant doctors think they have bested an incredibly complex immune system with these vaccines, and I have little doubt vaccines will come back to haunt us all eventually when 9 out 10 people's immune systems are messed up...hell, this might have happened already since auto-immune diseases are exploding in the population and it is KNOWN that vaccines can trigger auto-immunity...there are certainly other factors involved, like bad diet, but how are vaccines not being considered?). And think on this: Would you rather get the flu or an auto-immune disease (even if it is 1 in 100)? The flu is most dangerous when people fail to seek emergency treatment (IV fluids, specifically). Is that really such a risk for the VAST majority of people? No. But what are the risks of these vaccines that contain dangerous adjuvants (mercury or aluminum) and other ingredients that can have side-effects too? Maybe for certain diseases YOU would rather risk some vaccine side-effects than the disease. But the common flu? Or what about chicken pox? We have a ticking time bomb with this vaccine since those vaccinated DO NOT have real immunity and if they fail to get their 'boosters' every decade for LIFE they risk getting shingles which is way worse than just getting the disease as a kid and being itchy for week and then being done with it forever. Same with the rotavirus. Kids get diarrhea for a few days then they have immunity forever (if the kid is really ill, get them an IV to avoid dehydration and the risk of dying is almost zilch). Nope, now they get the worthless vaccine (which has made $30 million for Paul Offit) and risk getting the disease later in life when, again like chicken pox, the symptoms can be much more dangerous. What about HPV? Are you aware 99% of people clear the HPV viruses to a dormant state within two years? Have you seen how many girls have been crippled for life by Gardisil? Is it really worth it? And big pharma wants it mandated of course (for boys too!). Oh, and the idea that it prevents cancer is still a hypothesis (there is no proof because the vaccine is a mere 5 years old and data like that takes decades to amass). So then, for the pro-vaccine crowd I recommend they do their own research (and not just on the CDC website, although even their own 'evidence' will leave you underwhelmed if you read through it and look at the study parameters). Then, if you still decide you are pro-vaccine, great, you have the right to get yourself vaccinated. But then stop there please and stop harassing those of us who choose otherwise (and trying to usurp our personal rights by mandating vaccines through unconstitutional laws all under the guise of the 'greater good'). And please realize it is a slippery slope when you support mandates of vaccines or anything else really. The government will never stop meddling in your business if you let them start. Salt, sugar, caffeine, whatever is evil at moment. They have already made a HUGE mess trying to stop drugs. Just leave people alone, even if you disagree with them.
OH NOES!....SCIENCE AT WORK!

Quote:
Vaccines Halt Polio Outbreak in Tajikistan

FrontLines - July 2010

By Virginija Morgan


After an outbreak of more than 413 cases of polio in Tajikistan, 1,000 teams of doctors and nurses working under a USAID grant and the Tajikistan Ministry of Health have stopped the spread of the disease nearly three months after the first cases were registered.

Largely wiped out around the world since the discovery of the polio vaccine in the 1950s, the virus remains in a few remote regions of the world. International health officials, donors such as USAID, and local governments move swiftly once outbreaks are identified—including in Tajikistan. By June 21, new infections had stopped.

In April, the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed seven children in Tajikistan had contracted polio. Over the next three months, 413 cases were confirmed, signaling the largest polio outbreak in the world since 2004 and outstripping traditional polio hotspots like India and Nigeria. It was the first time such an outbreak had occurred in the Central Asian region since 2002. And, by mid-July, WHO reported nearly 700 cases of acute flaccid paralysis, a type of paralysis that is often caused by polio, in Tajikistan. Emerging cases of the paralysis usually signal the beginning of a polio outbreak.


A mark is placed on a child’s hand to show that he has received a round of polio vaccine.

Tajikistan was certified as polio free in 2002 a result of a vigorous effort over several years by many donors, including USAID. Since then, country health officials conducted annual immunizations to ensure that the country remained polio free.

“Certainly, there were children who missed the opportunity to be vaccinated due to migration from Tajikistan and inside of the country,” said Tajik Deputy Health Minister Aazam Mirzoyev during a press interview in May. “Some of them have not been vaccinated year after year. They have a role in the outbreak, because they do not have a shield against the disease.”

USAID has pledged $3 million for renewed efforts with WHO, UNICEF, regional ministries of health, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other organizations to carry out vaccination campaigns, surveillance, and community mobilization throughout Central Asia.

The Ministry of Health mobilized doctors and nurses to carry out vaccinations throughout the country. In addition, officials kicked off a massive communications campaign to inform the public about polio immunization.

In addition to vaccinations, millions of leaflets, posters, and banners in Tajik, Uzbek, Russian, and Dari were distributed in health centers, schools, kindergartens, markets, and mosques. Doctors and nurses visited homes in rural areas, encouraging parents and caregivers to ensure that all children are vaccinated in every round to build up immunity. “We are thankful to our international partners for their support of the polio immunization drive in Tajikistan,” Dr. Mirzoyev said.

Polio is a highly infectious viral disease that invades the nervous system. It can cause paralysis— one in 200 cases leads to irreversible paralysis, usually in the legs—and even death. The disease mainly affects children under age 5. The only way to prevent polio is through vaccination.

As of June 21, the immunization campaign was drawing to a close, and no new polio cases had been reported. Both the health specialists and the donor community are hopeful the outbreak has died out.

“Now that the outbreak has been stopped, it is important that we work together with the Ministry of Health of Tajikistan to strengthen the national health system, disease surveillance, and sanitation systems so that polio does not reemerge again,” said Bryn Sakagawa, deputy director of the Health and Education Office at USAID’s Central Asia regional office. . ★
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #42  
Old 02-27-2012, 02:51 PM
EDECO79 EDECO79 is offline
Newbie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

That article isn't science, fyi. I can pick this article to pieces with the flaws. Are you actually aware of the scientific method? Most people are not actually, including most in medicine. And it is once again painfully obvious after reading that piece.

What do you think vaccine opponents stand to gain with their position, anyway? It would be, "We told you so, now please stop pushing this industry corrupted nonsense as science." Compare that to what big pharma (and the WHO, FDA, CDC, state health departments, pharmacies, doctors offices, etc, who have been pushing vaccines like evangelical missionaries for decades) stand to lose if they are wrong on vaccines? Entire industries, careers, and medical paradigms would come crashing down (and it is coming eventually). And you seriously think good, rigorous, and honest science is involved with vaccines? You don't think profits have skewed anything in the slightest? I see you have skepticism for religion (which is good). Now if I can just convince you to apply that same skepticism to the 'medicine' that surrounds us today. I mean, why do you believe what you do? Do you really know? Do you also believe cholesterol is bad? Salt is bad? I am just curious where you are coming from and if you have actually applied critical thinking to what you are espousing.

Reply With Quote

  #43  
Old 02-27-2012, 03:06 PM
EDECO79 EDECO79 is offline
Newbie Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 5
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomaxim View Post
I'm sure not going too even attempt to read that jumbled mess.

Paragraph (Wiki).

Yes, I should have used paragraphs. And I know what a paragraph structure is (don't be a condescending dick). It's a bad habit picked up from these online comment sections over the years where I mean to leave a quick reply but then get carried away (and I honestly don't have the time to write a college quality essay, especially for people who will probably just ignore it anyway regardless of proper structure).

Reply With Quote

  #44  
Old 02-28-2012, 04:53 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by EDECO79 View Post
That article isn't science, fyi. I can pick this article to pieces with the flaws. Are you actually aware of the scientific method? Most people are not actually, including most in medicine. And it is once again painfully obvious after reading that piece.

What do you think vaccine opponents stand to gain with their position, anyway? It would be, "We told you so, now please stop pushing this industry corrupted nonsense as science." Compare that to what big pharma (and the WHO, FDA, CDC, state health departments, pharmacies, doctors offices, etc, who have been pushing vaccines like evangelical missionaries for decades) stand to lose if they are wrong on vaccines? Entire industries, careers, and medical paradigms would come crashing down (and it is coming eventually). And you seriously think good, rigorous, and honest science is involved with vaccines? You don't think profits have skewed anything in the slightest? I see you have skepticism for religion (which is good). Now if I can just convince you to apply that same skepticism to the 'medicine' that surrounds us today. I mean, why do you believe what you do? Do you really know? Do you also believe cholesterol is bad? Salt is bad? I am just curious where you are coming from and if you have actually applied critical thinking to what you are espousing.
I'm very well acquainted with the scientific method...which is something ant-vaccers are not.

Quote:
(don't be a condescending dick)
Dick much?
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #45  
Old 02-28-2012, 08:05 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

bump ahead of spam thread
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #46  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:29 AM
eugene66's Avatar
eugene66 eugene66 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,389
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

NaturalNews Insider Alert
Dear NaturalNews readers,
Have you ever noticed that every time the government forces somebody into doing something at gunpoint, they always claim it's for "public safety?"
Rawesome Foods raid? Public safety.
Forced innoculations of children? Public safety.
Searching the sack lunches of children who go to public school? Public safety.
But in my op-ed piece today, I argue that government-run "public safety" is a complete hoax. The government actually makes our lives more dangerous, not safer. Here's why:
http://www.naturalnews.com/035116_government_public_safety_democide.html


(NaturalNews) As the tyranny of destructive government envelops our once-free society, have you noticed how oppression, censorship and government aggression against the people is always defended as somehow protecting public safety?

Consider these astonishing contradictions:

• The government claims that every single air traveler must be intimately searched and confirmed harmless in order to protect the safety of a few hundred passengers on the plane, but that very same government conducts no safety testing whatsoever on each batch of toxic fluoride chemicals dumped into municipal water supplies that threaten the health of tens of millions!

• The government aggressively attacks raw milk farmers and food cooperatives who sell fresh milk to a few hundred people, claiming raw milk is extremely dangerous to the public, yet that same government does absolutely nothing to protect the public from MSG (obesity), aspartame (seizures and blindness), high fructose corn syrup (diabetes), sodium nitrite (cancer) and artificial food colors (behavioral disorders) that impact virtually the entire population! (At least a million times as many people eat MSG than drink raw dairy...)

• The government claims that it has the right to force all children to be forcibly vaccinated because it "protects society," yet this is by definition an open admission that vaccines don't work because otherwise all the vaccinated children would be 100% protected against unvaccinated children in the first place (and having unvaccinated children running around wouldn't matter).

• The FDA is now proposing that long-time nutritional supplement ingredients like vitamin C, ginger root and Echinacea must undergo a lengthy new safety review and approval process, yet the USDA openly approves the widespread experimental planting of genetically modified crops (GMOs) with absolutely no safety testing whatsoever -- all under the absurd presumption that GMOs are essentially "identical" to non-GMO crops. Except they aren't identical, otherwise they couldn't be patented, could they? What part of the word "modified" does the USDA not grasp?

• In many cities, the government says all children must wear helmets when riding their bicycles while adults are required to wear helmets when they ride motorcycles. But all those same people are openly allowed to go break their legs and crack their skulls wide open on a ski slope without even signing a waiver! Why is bicycling down the sidewalk so dangerous while barreling down a 3,000-foot mountain on a snowboard is acceptably safe? (Hint: because it's not about safety, it's about tourism money.)

• The federal government says that private citizens should only prepare for a maximum of a 3-day event such as a hurricane or storm. But the federal government itself has spent tens of billions of dollars building massive underground cave networks where decades of supplies are stockpiled: Food, water, guns, ammunition, medical supplies, communications equipment, non-hybrid seeds and much more. The message? YOU don't need to be safe, but WE do!

• City police departments claim they can roll their video cameras 24/7, filming you and your actions that happen in public spaces because it's all part of "public safety." But what happens when YOU try to film the police in those same public spaces? You get threatened, intimidated and arrested! (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=78...5B26FBB54FE025)

So who is keeping the People safe from crooked cops, then?

• The government says its War on Drugs protects the public from all the danger and criminality of the underground drug market. But it's the government that forced the drug market to go underground by criminalizing it! By choosing to decriminalize all recreational drug use, the government could end the criminality, suck all the profits out of street dealing, end the drug gang violence, collapse the Mexican drug cartels and halt the DEA's drug war violence which frequently results in rogue agents breaking down the wrong guy's door in the middle of the night and then shooting the family dog.

If the government really cared about public safety, they would protect the citizens from the DEA!

• You're supposed to be scared of using nasal irrigation devices which the CDC now warns may cause you to die from "brain-eating amoeba!" (http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/02/28/cdc-issues-warning-about-nasal-...) But at the same time, when the Fukushima nuclear facility went into a total meltdown and unleashed radioactive fallout across North America, Americans were all told there was nothing to worry about (while the EPA quietly raised the "allowable limits" of radiation exposure by literally 50,000 times or more for some isotopes).

• The CDC and WHO declared a "stage 6 pandemic" over the H5N1 flu scare, setting off a worldwide fear campaign focused on public safety. Yet when evidence continues to surface about all the tens of thousands of children who are stricken with autism each year -- mere hours after receiving multiple vaccine shots -- the government abandons any thought of safety and quietly pays off the parents of the autistic children through a secret vaccine injury compensation court whose cash payouts require total silence on the part of parents. (http://www.naturalnews.com/033635_vaccine_injury_compensation_governm...)

Other government experiments conducted under the banner of public safety

No matter what the government is trying to pull -- banning public protests, stealing an election, starting a war, disarming the nation or pushing a crazy new medical agenda -- it's always framed in the context of "public safety." Because the government never does anything wrong or abusive to people, does it?

Then what about these true facts of history?

• 1932 - The U.S. Public Health Service in Tuskegee, Ala. diagnoses 400 poor, black sharecroppers with syphilis but never tells them of their illness nor treats them; instead researchers use the men as human guinea pigs to follow the symptoms and progression of the disease. They all eventually die from syphilis and their families are never told that they could have been treated (Goliszek, University of Virginia Health System Health Sciences Library). (http://www.naturalnews.com/019189.html)

• 1945 - The U.S. State Department, Army intelligence and the CIA begin Operation Paperclip, offering Nazi scientists immunity and secret identities in exchange for work on top-secret government projects on aerodynamics and chemical warfare medicine in the United States ("Project Paperclip").

• 1946 - The U.S. government knowingly funded and deliberately engaged in criminal medical experiments against Guatemalan prisoners, and the scientists engaged in these crimes were then promoted to high levels of influence in the medical community. At least 5,500 people were drafted into the experiments, including children, women and the mentally ill. The number deliberately infected with sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs) exceeded 1,300. Many died.

• 1947 - Col. E.E. Kirkpatrick of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) issues a top-secret document (707075) dated Jan. 8. In it, he writes that "certain radioactive substances are being prepared for intravenous administration to human subjects as a part of the work of the contract" (Goliszek).

A secret AEC document dated April 17 reads, "It is desired that no document be released which refers to experiments with humans that might have an adverse reaction on public opinion or result in legal suits," revealing that the U.S. government was aware of the health risks its nuclear tests posed to military personnel conducting the tests or nearby civilians (Goliszek).

• 1978 - The CDC begins experimental hepatitis B vaccine trials in New York. Its ads for research subjects specifically ask for promiscuous homosexual men. Professor Wolf Szmuness of the Columbia University School of Public Health had made the vaccine's infective serum from the pooled blood serum of hepatitis-infected homosexuals and then developed it in chimpanzees, the only animal susceptible to hepatitis B, leading to the theory that HIV originated in chimpanzees before being transferred over to humans via this vaccine. A few months after 1,083 homosexual men receive the vaccine, New York physicians begin noticing cases of Kaposi's sarcoma, Mycoplasma penetrans and a new strain of herpes virus among New York's homosexual community -- diseases not usually seen among young, American men, but that would later be known as common opportunistic diseases associated with AIDS (Goliszek). (http://www.naturalnews.com/019187.html)

• 1996 - Professor Adil E. Shamoo of the University of Maryland and the organization Citizens for Responsible Care and Research sends a written testimony on the unethical use of veterans in medical research to the U.S. Senate's Committee on Governmental Affairs, stating: "This type of research is on-going nationwide in medical centers and VA hospitals supported by tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money. These experiments are high risk and are abusive, causing not only physical and psychic harm to the most vulnerable groups but also degrading our society's system of basic human values. Probably tens of thousands of patients are being subjected to such experiments" ("Testimony of Adil E. Shamoo, Ph.D.").

• 1997 - In an experiment sponsored by the U.S. government, researchers withhold medical treatment from HIV-positive African-American pregnant women, giving them a placebo rather than AIDS medication.

Want to learn more true facts about history? Stuff that will boggle your mind? Read "The Rise of the Fourth Reich" by Jim Marrs. He's the author of The Trillion Dollar Conspiracy which I gave a Book of the Year award in 2011:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033509_Jim_Marrs_Trillion_Dollar_Conspirac...

Far from protecting public safety, Big Government is the greatest threat to your safety

Question: Which institution is responsible for the most human suffering, genocide and murder across human history? Is it some terrorist group? Some band of evil rebels?

Nope, it's government. Government is the single most dangerous entity across human history, responsible for the mass murder of hundreds of millions of people (and growing daily).

Think about it: Government is what puts fluoride poison in your water. Government allows mad scientists to plant GM crops containing death poisons. Government secretly injects schoolchildren without parental consent. Government spies on your phone calls, confiscated your wages, contaminates your food and poisons your water. And then, from time to time, government just murders millions of people.

"Democide" is the term that describes death by government (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide), and democide turns out to be far more dangerous than war itself! "In the 20th century, democide surpassed war as the leading cause of non-natural death," says Wikipedia.

So if you really want to protect public safety, there's only one logical way to do it:

Sharply shrink the size of government! The real risk to your health and safety, it turns out, is not raw milk or dietary supplements but your own government and its unbridled madness.

The smaller the government, it turns out, the safer we all are.

Learn more: http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=151656

Cancer and chemo is also just a money maker here http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=151655

Reply With Quote

  #47  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:34 AM
eugene66's Avatar
eugene66 eugene66 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,389
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by sojustask View Post
Actually people who have had 5 or more flu vaccinations are 10 times more likely to develop Alzheimers than those who don't get a flu shot.

The key to not getting the flu is not to compromise your immune system. It's never been proven that the ingredients in a flu shot prevent you from getting the flu.

Proper bed rest, good and fresh (not sitting on the shelf forever) vitamins, preferably natural not chemical in nature (especially vitamin C and E and other anti-oxidents), proper exercise and washing hands, door knobs, bathroom fixtures and not sharing eating and drinking utensils will do more to guard you against catching the flu than any shot. Even an honest MD will tell you that.

Lady Mod
Yep I couldn't agree more.

Quote:
• The government claims that it has the right to force all children to be forcibly vaccinated because it "protects society," yet this is by definition an open admission that vaccines don't work because otherwise all the vaccinated children would be 100% protected against unvaccinated children in the first place (and having unvaccinated children running around wouldn't matter).


• The CDC and WHO declared a "stage 6 pandemic" over the H5N1 flu scare, setting off a worldwide fear campaign focused on public safety. Yet when evidence continues to surface about all the tens of thousands of children who are stricken with autism each year -- mere hours after receiving multiple vaccine shots -- the government abandons any thought of safety and quietly pays off the parents of the autistic children through a secret vaccine injury compensation court whose cash payouts require total silence on the part of parents. (http://www.naturalnews.com/033635_vaccine_injury_compensation_governm...)



Reply With Quote

  #48  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:55 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Expert answer

Quote:
Living Well Expert
Dr. Jennifer Shu
Pediatrician,
Children's Medical Group

Thanks for your question. The short answer is no. Here's some background information to consider.

Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia in adults and affects roughly 5 million Americans. It is unknown what causes Alzheimer's disease but older age and family history appear to play a role.

One theory is that flu vaccines (possibly an additive within the shot) may be responsible for the difficulties with thought, memory and language seen in individuals who have Alzheimer's disease.

However, research does not support this theory. In fact, a study of more than 4,000 adults in Canada showed that past exposure to several vaccines, including the flu vaccine, was linked to a decreased chance of developing Alzheimer's.

Other research has reported that getting an annual flu vaccine was associated with a lower risk of death in the elderly.

Annual flu vaccines are recommended for everyone 6 months and older, but are particularly important for individuals over 50 or under 5 years of age and those with certain medical conditions.

If you have further questions about flu vaccines or Alzheimer's disease, be sure to talk with your physician.
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #49  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:08 AM
eugene66's Avatar
eugene66 eugene66 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,389
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Expert answer
It is a known fact that Aluminium causes Alzheimer's disease. A metal. I would think is quite plausible to believe that Mercury laced vaccines cause it too, along with autism.

Let me quote again.
Quote:
• The CDC and WHO declared a "stage 6 pandemic" over the H5N1 flu scare, setting off a worldwide fear campaign focused on public safety. Yet when evidence continues to surface about all the tens of thousands of children who are stricken with autism each year -- mere hours after receiving multiple vaccine shots -- the government abandons any thought of safety and quietly pays off the parents of the autistic children through a secret vaccine injury compensation court whose cash payouts require total silence on the part of parents. (http://www.naturalnews.com/033635_vaccine_injury_compensation_governm...)

Reply With Quote

  #50  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:20 AM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Why don't you look to real doctors for your information?

Quote:
Myth 4: Drinking out of aluminum cans or cooking in aluminum pots and pans can lead to Alzheimer’s disease.
Reality: During the 1960s and 1970s, aluminum emerged as a possible suspect in Alzheimer’s. This suspicion led to concern about exposure to aluminum through everyday sources such as pots and pans, beverage cans, antacids and antiperspirants. Since then, studies have failed to confirm any role for aluminum in causing Alzheimer’s. Experts today focus on other areas of research, and few believe that everyday sources of aluminum pose any threat.
Quote:
Myth 6: Flu shots increase risk of Alzheimer’s disease

Reality: A theory linking flu shots to a greatly increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease has been proposed by a U.S. doctor whose license was suspended by the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners. Several mainstream studies link flu shots and other vaccinations to a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease and overall better health.

A Nov. 27, 2001, Canadian Medical Journal report suggests older adults who were vaccinated against diphtheria or tetanus, polio, and influenza seemed to have a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease than those not receiving these vaccinations. The full text of this report is posted on the journal’s Web site.

A report in the Nov. 3, 2004, JAMA found that annual flu shots for older adults were associated with a reduced risk of death from all causes. The abstract of that report is posted on PubMed.
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #51  
Old 03-01-2012, 01:12 PM
eugene66's Avatar
eugene66 eugene66 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,389
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logically brainwashed
Reality: A theory linking flu shots to a greatly increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease has been proposed by a U.S. doctor whose license was suspended by the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners. Several mainstream studies link flu shots and other vaccinations to a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease and overall better health.
BOARD of medical examiners........That figures.
Quote:
Brain autopsy of pollution victim rekindles contaminant fears.
Michael Hopkin
Aluminum can accumulate in the twists of deformed proteins that characterize Alzheimer's disease.© SPL
Fears of a link between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease have been reignited by the case of a British woman who died of the illness 16 years after an industrial accident polluted her local drinking water.
An autopsy on Carole Cross's brain showed that she was suffering from a rare form of early-onset Alzheimer's when she died in May 2004, and also revealed the presence of high levels of aluminium in her tissues. The researchers who investigated her brain cannot say whether the aluminium was the cause, but point out that the woman had no family history of dementia.
The polluting incident occurred in 1988 when a truck driver mistakenly emptied some 20 tonnes of aluminium sulphate — used in the early stages of wastewater treatment — into a tank containing drinking water destined for the village of Camelford in Cornwall, UK. An estimated 20,000 people may have been exposed to high levels of the chemical for several weeks.
Concerned residents are waiting to see whether more people will be similarly affected. Anecdotal reports state that several other villagers are suffering from dementia.
Something in the water

Although only a single case, the discovery has reopened the possibility that aluminium could be linked to Alzheimer's disease, say Christopher Exley, a chemist at Keele University, UK and Margaret Esiri, a University of Oxford neurologist, who publish details of their investigation on Cross in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry1.
Aluminium is firmly linked to some temporary forms of dementia, Esiri says. Kidney dialysis patients living in areas where water is high in aluminium, for example, sometimes experience 'dialysis dementia', as a result of the large quantities of contaminated water passing through their bodies.
“Once aluminium binds to proteins, it sticks for good. It's like trying to use superglue to mend a Swiss watch.”
But the link between aluminium and Alzheimer's has been more controversial, says Daniel Perl, a neuropathologist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, who has written a commentary on the Camelford case2.
Aluminium is often found in the twists of deformed protein, called 'neurofibrillary tangles', that characterize the disease. But there is no strong evidence that it is involved in the disease's onset, Perl cautions. "I realize that's quite a conservative answer," he says. "But show me a couple more cases like this and I might have to change it."
Perl points out that, of the 20 most common elements on Earth, aluminium is the only one not involved in any essential biological process. That's because of its feisty chemistry, he explains. When in solution, aluminium ions are small and highly charged, making them very reactive. "Once aluminium binds to proteins, it sticks for good," he says. "It's like trying to use superglue to mend a Swiss watch."
Accelerated illness

What makes Cross's case interesting is that she had succumbed to a very rare form of Alzheimer's, but had a genetic predisposition, through a gene called APOE, to developing a more common form of the disease later in life, says Esiri. This raises the possibility that her aluminium exposure may have accelerated the onset of disease. Previous studies of transgenic mice expressing a similar gene have shown that feeding them aluminium in drinking water can cause similar symptoms at a young age.
Here I found an objective study made by the Aluminium industry themselves.
Quote:
HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR
ALUMINIUM, ALUMINIUM OXIDE, AND ALUMINIUM
HYDROXIDE


Regardless of the duration of exposure, the toxicity attributed to aluminium is dependent
upon the physiochemical properties (solubility, pH, bioavailability, etc.), type of
aluminium preparation, route of administration, and physiological status (presence of
renal dysfunction). Following oral exposure, aluminium distributes throughout the
organism with accumulation in bone, kidneys and brain being of concern to humans with
evidence of renal dysfunction, anemia or neurobehavioural alterations reported after
excessive doses. The presence of aluminium in vaccines was found to be associated with
macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF) at the site of i.m. injection. The toxicity of aluminium
is affected by chelating agents and ligands although the mechanisms underlying toxicity
remain unknown. However, it should be noted that only at excessive concentrations of
aluminium are toxic manifestations seen and, hence aluminium is considered to possess a
“low” potential for producing adverse effects.

The form of aluminium most often presented to tissues outside of the blood stream is
expected to be bound to Tf. In brain, aluminium is prone to dissociate from Tf as a
soluble citrate salt. Most cells of the central nervous system (CNS) express Tf receptor,
and thus receptor-mediated uptake would be one mechanism by which aluminium could
enter cells of the brain
. Free flow endocytosis of aluminium citrate could be an
alternative route of uptake. As outlined in Effects on Laboratory Mammals and In Vitro
Test Systems, Neurotoxicity, In Vivo Models, Neuropathology, there is at least one
example of human pathology which is consistent with this mode of tissue exposure.
Choroid plexus epithelia, cortical glia, and cortical neurons of patients exhibiting dialysis
associated encephalopathy (DAE) develop intracellular argentophylllic granules that are
lysosome-derived and intracytoplasmic. Uptake of aluminium-Tf complexes via
receptor-mediated endocytosis would be expected to produce just such pathology.
Whether aluminium, of any amount or speciation, escapes these compartments to impact
on intracellular processes in humans is unknown. If relatively high doses produce
pathology of such a distinctive nature, then it is reasonable to presume that lower doses of
aluminium would follow similar pathways into the nervous system of humans.

In the studies of animals, it is important to note that a few reports have documented a
pathologic accumulation of aluminium in intracellular lysosome-derived structures.
Aluminium accumulation in lysosome-like cytoplasmic granules of retinal neurons in rats
18
exposed to very high doses of aluminium was reported (see Effects on Laboratory
Mammals and In Vitro Test Systems, Neurotoxicity, In Vivo Models, Rodent Models of
Aluminium Toxicity by Direct Injection). Severe atrophy of the retina and loss of
photoreceptors
was also noted. Similarly, another study noted intracellular
accumulations of aluminium in the brain of rats feed diets high in aluminium. For CNS it
seems likely that the mode of delivery to the tissue is through Tf-mediated uptake. From
animal studies and the clear association of aluminium exposure and DAE, it is clear that
high levels of aluminium in CNS can lead to neurotoxicity. From the current literature it
remains difficult to assess what a concentration of aluminium in serum (chronic levels)
correlates with neurotoxicity. The effects of aluminium on the developing nervous
system have also not been thoroughly addressed.
In regards to mechanisms by which aluminium could play a role in AD, there are both
direct and indirect modes of potential action. In a direct mode, aluminium could
potentiate the aggregation of molecules known to form pathologic lesions in AD. There
is evidence that aluminium can promote the aggregation of β-amyloid peptide in vitro.
However, whether aluminium would dissociate from Tf at an appreciable rate and bind β-
amyloid peptide in vivo is unclear. One study found no association between AD-like
pathology and long-term ingestion of aluminium. Indeed in this study of older patients,
the incidence of AD-associated pathology in patients with DAE was no different from
controls. Although these studies would suggest that there is little direct evidence for an
association between AD and aluminium, a study of transgenic mice that produce
Alzheimer-type amyloid pathology noted that mice feed diets high in aluminium showed
19
increased levels of amyloid (see Effects on Laboratory Mammals and In Vitro Test
Systems, Neurotoxicity, Alzheimer’s Disease). Moreover, it is well established in the
rabbit that exposure to aluminium induces the formation of filamentous structures
containing cytoplasmic neurofilament protein (see Effects on Laboratory Mammals and
In Vitro Test Systems, Neurotoxicity, Motor Neuron Disease). Therefore, it is difficult to
determine how a life-time of exposure to aluminium might influence the development of
Alzheimer-type pathology by affecting the folding or clearance of “at-risk” proteins such
as β-amyloid, tau, and α-synuclein.
Apart from the potential that aluminium might interact directly with molecules implicated
in AD and related neurodegenerative disorders, studies in animals have revealed potential
mechanisms by which aluminium might indirectly impact on the function of the nervous
system. In Effects on Laboratory Mammals and In Vitro Test Systems, Neurotoxicity,
Alzheimer’s Disease, studies are described that reported aluminium may affect levels of
cholesterol, which has been suggested in numerous studies as a potential modulator or
Alzheimer-type amyloid formation. Effects on Laboratory Mammals and In Vitro Test
Systems, Neurotoxicity, In Vivo Models, Rodent Models of Aluminium Toxicity by Direct
Injection describes several studies that have reported elevated levels of markers of
oxidative stress in animals exposed to aluminium. These studies suggest potential
mechanisms by which long-term exposure to aluminium could be deleterious and could
synergistically worsen cognitive abilities in individuals that have pathologic
abnormalities associated with AD.

Reply With Quote

  #52  
Old 03-01-2012, 07:48 PM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Just more nutter bullshit.

The real doctors say different:

Quote:
Aluminium and Alzheimer's disease
A number of environmental factors have been put forward as possible contributory causes of Alzheimer's disease in some people. Among these is aluminium. There is circumstantial evidence linking this metal with Alzheimer's disease, but no causal relationship has yet been proved. As evidence for other causes continues to grow, a possible link with aluminium seems increasingly unlikely. This factsheet looks at the circumstantial evidence and current medical and scientific views.
Causes of Alzheimer's disease

Researchers believe that in the majority of those affected, Alzheimer's disease results from a combination of different risk factors rather than one single cause. Such factors, which vary from person to person, may include age, genetic predisposition, other diseases or environmental agents.
The chief symptoms of Alzheimer's disease are progressive decline of memory and other higher mental functions. These changes are associated with the loss of brain cells and the development of two kinds of microscopic damage in the brain known as 'plaques' and 'tangles'.
Plaques consist of an abnormal deposit of a particular protein called beta amyloid between the brain cells. Tangles occur within cells, and are formed from abnormal thread-like deposits of a protein called tau, which is normally part of the cell's 'skeleton'.
(For more information about causes of Alzheimer's disease see Factsheet 450, Am I at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease?, and Factsheet 405, Genetics and dementia.)
Evidence linking aluminium and Alzheimer's disease

The hypothesis that there is a link between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease was first put forward in the 1960s (Terry and Pena 1965, Klatzo et al 1965). Since then, researchers have claimed a number of other circumstantial links between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease, as follows:
Aluminium has been shown to be associated both with plaques and with tangles in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease (Crapper et al 1976). However, the presence of aluminium does not mean that the aluminium was the causal factor − it is more likely to be a harmless secondary association.
Some have claimed that people with Alzheimer's disease have a higher than average level of aluminium in their brains. However, other studies find no difference between the overall amount of aluminium in the brains of people with Alzheimer's and the amount in normal brains (Trapp et al 1978).
Studies of other sources of aluminium, such as tea, antacid medications and antiperspirants have also failed to show a positive association with Alzheimer's disease (Flaten and Odegård 1988).
People with kidney failure are unable to excrete aluminium, and yet they frequently have to be treated with compounds that contain aluminium. Aluminium accumulates in nerve cells that are particularly vulnerable in Alzheimer's disease. However, even after years of high exposure to aluminium, patients with kidney failure are no more likely to develop dementia or the hallmark pathological changes of Alzheimer's disease (Netter et al 1990).
Treatment with desferrioxamine (DFO), a drug which binds aluminium and removes it from the body, also has a major effect on iron stores in the body. Therefore the effects of DFO may have nothing to do with aluminium (Gomez et al 1998).
There have been many experimental studies on animals and on isolated cells showing that aluminium has toxic effects on the nervous system, but in almost all cases the doses of aluminium used were much higher than those occurring naturally in tissues (Gitelman 1988).
Sources of aluminium

The main sources of aluminium in our diet include tea, beer, baked products, drinking water, toothpaste, aluminium-based antacids, aluminium cookware and some canned beverages (Rao and Rao 1995). Aluminium uptake from our diets is usually very low, with more than 99% passing through the digestive system unabsorbed. Absorption increases significantly in the presence of acidic foods such as orange juice. The small amount of aluminium that is absorbed into the body is rapidly excreted by the kidneys in urine, except in individuals with impaired kidney function, where aluminium retention within the body is responsible for dialysis dementia.
Aluminium is naturally present in some water, and aluminium sulphate is widely used in the treatment of public water supplies. However, intake of aluminium from water is very small in comparison with other sources.
Some aluminium from the air may enter the lungs as dust, but this form is highly insoluble, and hardly any reaches the rest of the body.
Only a minute proportion of the aluminium we ingest from these various sources is absorbed by the body, and even this small fraction is usually excreted in the urine or harmlessly deposited in bone, which acts as a 'sink' to remove aluminium.
The expert view on aluminium

Since the idea that the metal might be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease was first proposed there have been numerous conferences on aluminium and health. The medical research community, international and government regulatory agencies and the aluminium industry all review the evidence at frequent intervals. The overwhelming medical and scientific opinion is that the findings outlined above do not convincingly demonstrate a causal relationship between aluminium and Alzheimer's disease, and that no useful medical or public health recommendations can be made − at least at present (Massey and Taylor 1989).
It has proved extremely difficult to devise studies to resolve this problem one way or another. Alzheimer's is a common disease with multiple causes, while aluminium is widespread in the environment, and there are no methods that allow us to measure an individual's 'body burden' or lifetime exposure to this element.
In the future, it is possible that suitable 'transgenic' animal models (which develop the pathological features of Alzheimer's disease in animals' brains) will enable scientists to determine if such changes are accelerated or exacerbated by aluminium at levels that correspond to normal human exposure.
For details of Alzheimer's Society services in your area, visit alzheimers.org.uk/localinfo
For information about a wide range of dementia-related topics, visit alzheimers.org.uk/factsheets
References

Crapper D R, Krishnan S S and Quittkat S (1976) 'Aluminium, neurofibrillary degeneration and Alzheimer's disease'. Brain 99: 67-80
Flaten T P and Odegård M (1988) 'Tea, aluminium and Alzheimer's disease'. Food and Chemical Toxicology 26 (11-12): 959-60
Gitelman H J ed (1988) Aluminium and health, a critical review, London: CRC Press
Gomez M, Esparza J L, Domingo J L, Singh PK and Jones M M (1998) 'Comparative aluminium mobilizing actions of deferoxamine and four 3-hydroxypyrid-4-ones in aluminium-loaded rats'. Toxicology 130 (2): 175-81 (7)
Klatzo I, Wisniewski H and Streicher E (1965) 'Experimental production of neurofibrillary pathology: 1. Light microscopic observations'. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 24: 187-99
Massey RC and Taylor D eds (1989) Aluminium in food and the environment. London: Royal Society of Chemistry Netter P, Kessler M, Gaucher A and Bannwarth B 'Does aluminium have a pathogenic role in dialysis associated arthropathy?' Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 49 (8): 573-75
Rao J K S and Rao V G (1995) 'Aluminium leaching from utensils - a kinetic study'. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 46: 31-38
Terry R D and Pena C (1965) 'Experimental production of neurofibrillary pathology: electron microscopy, phosphate histochemistry and electron probe analysis'. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology 24: 200-10
Trapp G A, Miner G D, Zimmerman R L, Mastri A R, Heston L L (1978) 'Aluminum levels in brain in Alzheimer's disease'. Biological Psychiatry 13 (6): 709-18
Factsheet 406

Last updated: September 2008
Last reviewed: September 2008
Reviewed by: Dr Ayesha Khan, Scientific Liaison Officer, Alzheimer's Society
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #53  
Old 03-01-2012, 07:59 PM
LogicallyYours's Avatar
LogicallyYours LogicallyYours is offline
Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,378
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

From the UNLV study:

Quote:
Conclusion

Based on the above data and arguments, the neurotoxic
effects of Al are beyond any doubt, and Al as a factor in
AD cannot be discarded. However, whether Al is a sole
factor in AD and whether it is a factor in all AD cases is
still debatable. This is mainly because AD is multifactorial disease, and to date the specific etiology(s) of AD are
unknown. Thus, the Al hypothesis, along with other hypotheses, continues to survive. Since the accumulation of
Al may occur in later stages of AD, we propose that Al
may not initiate the AD disease process, but suspect that
at the very least it exacerbates the neurodegenerative
process.
Moreover, the question of why Al accumulates in
some, but not all, degenerating brain [Traub R. D. et al.
(1981) Neurology 31: 986–990]. Al can be thought of as
one of the etiological factors along with other factors
combined with a differential genetic susceptibility that
may be crucial to the pathology of AD. Future efforts
should systematically track the changes in Al and other
transition elements during the progression of AD in order
to better understand its involvement in the disease
process
So...TO DEBUNK YOUR CLAIM..."IT'S A WELL KNOWN FACT THAT ALUMINUM CAUSES ALZHEIMERS..."

DEBUNKED.
__________________
"Religion is a heavy suitcase: all you have to do is put it down."
-----------------------------------------------------------
"I have read the bible...more than once. I was not impressed nor was I so moved to give up my ability to think for myself and surrender my knowledge of facts for the unfounded belief in a mythical sky-fairy." - Me.

Reply With Quote

  #54  
Old 03-01-2012, 08:57 PM
eugene66's Avatar
eugene66 eugene66 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,389
Re: The Flu Shot is a Scam

Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicallyYours View Post
Just more nutter bullshiz.

The real doctors say different:
Right you are then. LOL

What do you think makes them "real" funding?

Government approved?

Enjoy your aluminium waste (Fluoride) and aluminium polluted stuff then.

BTW I think it shows.


Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You Folks Are Only Going To Get One Shot At This Travelman18 Political Chat 3 02-20-2012 08:41 AM
(flu shot scam) 10 Things The Government Does Not acerlghp Government Scams 11 12-09-2009 06:48 AM
My Baby Shot Me Down Yeah Well Fine Then Political Chat 6 06-03-2007 09:21 AM
How to do a screen shot? bogey523 Internet Scams 9 01-25-2006 08:36 PM
Shot Anyone? tommy4887 Political Chat 18 09-27-2005 11:25 AM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the User’s own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.