report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER
Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Political Chat
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-12-2011, 04:25 AM
SnappyDan's Avatar
SnappyDan SnappyDan is online now
Florida Cracker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,492
Giving away the farm!

This doesn't surprise me at all!

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article..._away_the_farm


President Barack Obama's administration recently threatened to veto the defense budget, citing "serious concerns" over provisions that limit the U.S. missile defense know-how that the White House is permitted to share with Moscow. This is the sort of information that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, in his earlier days, would have assigned his spies to steal. Through its single-minded pursuit of "resetting" relations with Russia, the Obama administration may simply be willing to hand over this information and, in doing so, weaken U.S. national security.


Only two days after issuing the veto threat -- and as Obama tried to warm Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to U.S. missile defense plans at the G-8 Summit in Deauville, France -- the House of Representatives passed the defense bill. It included the provision that the president's team finds so offensive: Section 1228 requires that no funds can be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive U.S. missile defense technology.
This act of congressional prudence did not come out of nowhere. The Senate debate over New START raised questions about what the Obama administration may have promised Moscow regarding U.S. missile defense plans. The debate stemmed from the treaty's preamble, which linked offensive and defensive weapons, and a Russian unilateral statement that stated ratification of the treaty was conditional on whether the United States made improvements to its missile defense systems. In a treaty about reducing offensive weapons, it was clear the Russians required the Obama administration to include U.S. defenses in the bargain.
With that issue still unresolved, Congress discovered that the administration has been working on a missile defense agreement with the Russians and that Moscow had requested that the United States share with it loads of sensitive U.S. missile defense technology and operational authority as part of that deal. In the administration's eagerness to please the Kremlin, it may just oblige.
The House of Representatives has given a firm "no" to that prospect through its decision to ignore Obama's veto threat and approve the defense appropriations bill by a veto-proof vote of 322 to 96.The Senate may act similarly.On April 14, 39 Republican senators sent a letter to the president expressing their concern over the administration's consideration of granting to the Russians sensitive U.S. technology and "red button" authority to prevent the interception of incoming missiles headed for U.S. troops or allies. This would allow Russia to deny the United States the ability to intercept a missile Washington had determined to be a threat.

The letter, spearheaded by Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), requested the administration provide the Senate with assurances that it will not share sensitive information with Moscow. The senators cited the problem that sharing this information with Russia poses in light of its history of espionage and technological cooperation with Iran and Syria.

They're right to be concerned. Tehran is thumbing its nose at Washington and doubling down on its missile program. The director of national intelligence, James Clapper, told a congressional panel in March that Iran "would likely choose missile delivery as its preferred method of delivering a nuclear weapon" and that the Islamic Republic "continues to expand the scale, reach and sophistication of its ballistic missile forces, many of which are inherently capable of carrying a nuclear payload."

Russian assistance has contributed to the progress made by Iran's nuclear and missile programs. Should the United States share critical information about its missile defenses with the Russians, a Russian entity -- official or otherwise -- could pass that information along to Tehran, enabling the Iranians to capitalize on the weaknesses in the U.S. system.
Nevertheless, the Obama administration continues to demonstrate its penchant for bargaining away missile defense, and the United States is not currently developing and deploying missile defense technology at the rate and quantity the threat demands.
The proliferation of missiles, especially short-range devices, continues to accelerate. As a result, the United States has a greater need than ever for short-range defensive systems like the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) and the Patriot air and missile defense system. The United States, its forces abroad, and its allies are also vulnerable to short-range missiles fired from ships at sea and long-range missiles fired in large quantities. The only system the United States currently has to defend against intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) is the ground-based midcourse defense (GMD) system, which is limited in its ability. The sea-based Aegis system is supposed to complement the GMD system in defending the homeland against long-range missiles by 2020, but the intelligence community continues to estimate that Iran will have an ICBM by 2015.

Leaders in the House, and particularly the Armed Services Committee, deserve commendation for trying to address these weaknesses. The House defense bill added funds for short-range defenses, the GMD system, and Aegis; and perhaps most strikingly, it mandated the administration to conduct a study on the technical and operational feasibility of space-based interceptors -- the ideal type of system to intercept missiles at the optimal point, during their boost phase.

But as the administration's veto threat demonstrates, the future of U.S. missile defense requires more than Congress alone can provide. Here's hoping that the White House comes to its senses and stops trying to use a degradation in U.S. national security to purchase a Russian "reset."
__________________
I swear by my life and my love for it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for me.
John Galt


Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-13-2011, 08:41 AM
willyjoe willyjoe is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,462
Re: Giving away the farm!

If you'll recall properly, ya'll stole the farm in the first place.



Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 06-13-2011, 09:28 AM
mumbles's Avatar
mumbles mumbles is offline
Most Valued Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,803
Re: Giving away the farm!

that's a funny picture! the leader of the free world on the left and the communist dictator on the right.

Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-13-2011, 11:37 AM
willyjoe willyjoe is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,462
Re: Giving away the farm!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mumbles View Post
that's a funny picture! the leader of the free world on the left and the communist dictator on the right.

Both of them representing societies with "free" market economies.

Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 06-13-2011, 02:02 PM
brywilson2's Avatar
brywilson2 brywilson2 is offline
Hating everyone equally since 1966
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,586
Re: Giving away the farm!

We all know Obonzo's a treasonous scumbag. Your point is?
__________________

Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 06-13-2011, 09:57 PM
lexx's Avatar
lexx lexx is offline
Most Valued Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,953
Re: Giving away the farm!

Quote:
Originally Posted by brywilson2 View Post
We all know Obonzo's a treasonous scumbag. Your point is?
vote for ron paul and then just wait for the imminent invasion!? hey ron, what's china doin these days!? hell if i know, we mind our own business stateside while i'm pres!?
__________________
i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you

Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 06-13-2011, 10:23 PM
lexx's Avatar
lexx lexx is offline
Most Valued Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,953
Re: Giving away the farm!

and you know what they say, YA CANT TAKE IT WITH YA!? i had a crazy thought!? what if we declare ourselves to be COMMUNISTS!? then we could demand all kinds of things from the other COMMIES!? OR ELSE!? this they would understand, and capitulate too!? after all, taking away the BURDEN of CONQUERING the "free world" would be seen as a GREAT RELIEF!? this also would simultaneously relieve US of having to ACT like the "GOOD GUYS" all the time!? after all, the only way OUT, is IN!?
__________________
i do not endorse/recommend any advertising on scam.com associated with my name /posts or otherwise. thank you


Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How To Get A Fake ID From Zio-Nazis' Passport Farm dchristie Political Chat 4 03-27-2010 04:02 PM
Lil Farm Scam?? karlamaria Business Scams 3 11-02-2009 06:07 AM
Farm Murders in South Africa David Ben-Ariel Political Chat 67 04-03-2009 08:49 AM
Farm Murders in South Africa David Ben-Ariel Political Chat 12 01-04-2009 10:29 PM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the Userís own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.