report scams here at scam.com dont get scammed Scams and Scammers - Expose hypocrisy and spread respect ! Don't get ripped off! REGISTER  

Go Back   scams > Scam Message Board > Conspiracy Theories
Register FAQ Register To Post Member List Promote Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-09-2006, 11:43 AM
Ette Ette is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 347
Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

You will learn so much from this website, all you skeptics out there, this has pictures and videos . Find out what really happened Even a CNN reporter states at the scent that there is NO EVIDENCE that a 757 hit the pentagon! Click on to this website! http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm


Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 06-09-2006, 11:58 AM
Ette Ette is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 347
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Last year I read an article on a pilot who said, this was impossible for a unskilled pilot to fly an airplane into this buidling. Not even himself could do that and he has been flying for years. I will have to find that website!



Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 06-09-2006, 12:00 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Ette, spreading propaganda from conspiracy sites really negates any credibility you have. The fact that you spread misinformation, only shows the kind of classless character you are.

The truth about 9/11 can be found at
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://911myths.com/
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html

Freeomfiles is a known kook conspiracy theorist site. Uncredible and definitely not one to take seriously.

Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-09-2006, 12:01 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ette
Last year I read an article on a pilot who said, this was impossible for a unskilled pilot to fly an airplane into this buidling. Not even himself could do that and he has been flying for years. I will have to find that website!
funny, there are articles that hANJOUR, even though he was n't a Good pilot, said that even he could essentially fly a plane when it got going in the air. The only thing that the pilot instructors said he couldn't do well was land. HE certainly wasn't planning on landing the plane that day. Otherwise, they all stated that he was a normal pilot. not the best, but not the worst.

Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 06-09-2006, 08:06 PM
Ette Ette is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 347
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Hhaahahhahahahahahahahahaha You do NOT make any sense at all!

Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 06-09-2006, 10:38 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

ette, you dont make sense. Hanjour is the "inexperienced pilot" that people (conspiracy theorists) say that he couldn't fly a plane. When experts, say that he could; he just was bad at landing one.

Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 06-10-2006, 10:23 AM
soulbro's Avatar
soulbro soulbro is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,377
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Experts? :confused: wizzed in ur pants?

Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 06-10-2006, 10:26 AM
soulbro's Avatar
soulbro soulbro is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,377
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

...."funny, there are articles that hANJOUR, even though he was n't a Good pilot, said that even he could essentially fly a plane when it got going in the air......."

..........no theres not.... :mad: :( :rolleyes:

Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 06-12-2006, 10:08 PM
Synik Synik is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 485
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Yes, but, how do you explain the eye witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead and into the Pentagon???

Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 06-13-2006, 01:00 AM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Quote:
Originally Posted by soulbro
...."funny, there are articles that hANJOUR, even though he was n't a Good pilot, said that even he could essentially fly a plane when it got going in the air......."

..........no theres not.... :mad: :( :rolleyes:
From the Greenbelt (Maryland) Gazette:
The standard evaluation consists of one-to-one-and-a-half-hour flights east over the Chesapeake Bay area. Hanjour paid $400 cash and provided a valid pilot's license from Arizona, Bernard said. He failed because he showed problems landing the airplane and the flight instructor had to help him, Bernard said. But Hanjour's problems were nothing unusual, Bernard said. "There's no doubt in my mind that once (Flight 77) got going, he could have pointed that plane at a building and hit it."

For someone who's mission is to target large skyscrapers on a no chance in hell to return from with a commercial jetliner, I THINK landing a plane was the least bit of his concerns.

Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 06-13-2006, 03:31 PM
Synik Synik is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 485
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Soulbore,

"Yes, but, how do you explain the eye witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead and into the Pentagon???"

Answer the question.

Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 06-14-2006, 10:30 AM
soulbro's Avatar
soulbro soulbro is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,377
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synik
Soulbore,

"Yes, but, how do you explain the eye witnesses who saw a plane fly overhead and into the Pentagon???"

Answer the question.
> "A" plane? < depends on what plane u are referring to. Several planes are said to have been seen near the pentagon that morning sink. A fighter jet, a C130, a Boeing 737. Guess it depends on who u ask. And whos telling the truth. Or who telling a lie. Its all pretty distorted, I agree. Thats why keeping it simple works best. Find the BOEING 757 wreckage sink! YOU CANT! Its just not there. Boy ur one to talk about faith too! Man dude, u need a lot of faith to believe a big jet, going that fast with that much fuel did so little damage and then just disappeared. It would have been real bad had that really happened. A fire ball the size of the second WTC explosion would have been the result.
.......... sink,a CNN live reporter first on the scene said nothing looked like any jet hit the pentagon. Was he lying, or just mistaken? Neither, he reported what saw. No jet crash scene......sorry

Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 06-14-2006, 01:20 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Quote:
"A" plane? < depends on what plane u are referring to. Several planes are said to have been seen near the pentagon that morning sink.
So here you go, contradicting yourself. you stated that 'NO plane" hit the pentagon, and here you are asking what kind of plane.

Make up your mind.

And many of the eyewitnesses stated they saw a passenger airplane. I doubt many of them could tell hte difference between a 767, 747, 757, or a dC10. A lot of them look alike. Since i live near the airport here, I can tell you what plane is what. But to the average joe schmoe, the only thing they care about is how they get there, not what kind of plane they are traveling in.

[quote[] A fighter jet, a C130, a Boeing 737.[/quote]
many noted it was a 767, 757, and a 747. Truth be told, not many people can idnetify exactly what type of plane; especially if its traveling at 500+ mph about 20 feet.


Quote:
Guess it depends on who u ask. And whos telling the truth. Or who telling a lie.
Doubt that many people could come up with a lie, since many were the people who were nearly hit by the light poles on the highway. only a few were those on the ground near the pentagon, and they've stated they saw the plane.


[quote[] Its all pretty distorted, I agree. [/quote]
Only to you.

Quote:
Thats why keeping it simple works best. Find the BOEING 757 wreckage sink!
Posted already, images already available should you decided to stop being a lazy ass son of a witch and look for them. About 300 some odd images have been released for both the petnagon and the wtc crash sites. an additional 100 images have been released for the crash of flight 93.

Quote:
YOU CANT! Its just not there.
As stated over and over again, the debris are there. you just choose not to see it.

Quote:
Boy ur one to talk about faith too! Man dude, u need a lot of faith to believe a big jet, going that fast with that much fuel did so little damage and then just disappeared.
A little damage? it caused a 140 foot wide hole and nearly went though the ENTIRE side of the pentagon. The What saved the pentagon as the 7' reinforced CONCRETE walls. If there was no concrewalls, then the plane would have probably gone through the entire buidling on one side and partly into the next wedge.

Quote:
It would have been real bad had that really happened. A fire ball the size of the second WTC explosion would have been the result.
No, it wouldn't. This is why you show iwth every post that you are ignorant, but I rather just call you plain ol dumb.

Quote:
.......... sink,a CNN live reporter first on the scene said nothing looked like any jet hit the pentagon. Was he lying, or just mistaken? Neither, he reported what saw. No jet crash scene......sorry
And he later stated that he was mistaken, and that AT THE TIME, he had "thought' that no plane hi the pentagon. In fact THAT VERY SAME DAY, he retracted his first report and issued another, confirming that a plane indeed hit the pentagon. Care to post the link to that cnn report? I can show you where that SAME reported rebutted it.

Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 06-15-2006, 08:27 AM
soulbro's Avatar
soulbro soulbro is offline
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,377
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

That want be nessary wiz, Ill take ur word for it.
.......SO, 1st impression was no plane. Right? ......WHY?
.......Then later he saw the plane? What changed?
.................That dont add up. But am I suprised? Hardly.
...Nothing on 9 11 01 a.m. adds up, does it? Nothing! Not one damn thing.....
Naa wizzie,
call me moron all you want, no prob.. ill JUST add extra octane you want like...
So theres 300 pics uh? Could be 3000 pics, but you still want find a large Boeing 757 crash! Got any video yet?..... NO?
..........WHY NOT? IVE ASKED YOU FOR VIDEO MORE THAN ONCE, BUT YOU AVOID IT. VIDEO SAYS TOO MUCH.
TELL U WHAT, ILL DO IT FOR YOU, OK?
...........................
FOLKS, HERE IS THE ONLY VIDEO WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE. THE OTHERS YOU CAN BET ARE LOCKED UP SOMEWHERE.
..............YALL GO FIND THE BOEING! http://www.geocities.com/killtown/flight77/video.html

Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 06-15-2006, 09:03 AM
boone's Avatar
boone boone is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 352
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

Well, I am at a loss for words - this site speaks for itself - check it out!!!

http://www.geocities.com/pentalawn2000/

Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old 06-15-2006, 12:14 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

(sarcasm) oh yeah, a geo****ies site. really such a reliable source of information.(/sarcasm)

Reply With Quote

  #17  
Old 06-15-2006, 12:20 PM
Wizywyg Wizywyg is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 844
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

soulbro, you again continue to show what a moron you are:

Quote:
That want be nessary wiz, Ill take ur word for it.
.......SO, 1st impression was no plane.
no, 1st impression, a plane hit the pentagon.


Quote:
.......Then later he saw the plane? What changed?
Uh gee, cause he didn't witness the plane. but others did. but he didn't question eyewitnesses before he went on the air.
Quote:
.................That dont add up. But am I suprised? Hardly.
Because he was mkaing a report at the time everything was going nuts. that he didn't bother to question eyewitnesses (who were still on the highway) but those who were on the otherside of the building. They didn't see the plane because they weren't on the right side of hte pentagon. They thought they heard a "bomb" and that's about it.

Quote:
...Nothing on 9 11 01 a.m. adds up, does it? Nothing! Not one damn thing.....
Naa wizzie,
Only to a moron.

Quote:
call me moron all you want, no prob.. ill JUST add extra octane you want like...
So theres 300 pics uh? Could be 3000 pics, but you still want find a large Boeing 757 crash! Got any video yet?..... NO?
Because video doesn't exist. Can't show video that shows nothing. Why would they? it doesn't prove that no plane hit the pentagon. When there were eyewitnesses, testimony from firefighters, air traffuic controllers, the flight attendants brought in to identify the parts, accident investigators who pieced together the plane once they recovered the many parts they found.
Quote:
..........WHY NOT? IVE ASKED YOU FOR VIDEO MORE THAN ONCE, BUT YOU AVOID IT. VIDEO SAYS TOO MUCH.
I can't show you what doesn't exist. Get that through your ****ing thick skull.
Quote:
TELL U WHAT, ILL DO IT FOR YOU, OK?
...........................
FOLKS, HERE IS THE ONLY VIDEO WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE. THE OTHERS YOU CAN BET ARE LOCKED UP SOMEWHERE.
..............YALL GO FIND THE BOEING! http://www.geocities.com/killtown/flight77/video.html
that site is a known kook site. And they took an altered version of hte pentagon video to "prove" their point. however, they do not take into consideration thta the security camera at the parking lot was 200 yards away from the crash, that it was using a fish eye lens and was only recording at 7 frames per second.

Reply With Quote

  #18  
Old 06-15-2006, 06:30 PM
boone's Avatar
boone boone is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 352
Re: Flight 77 : What really happened at the Pentagon

So, wizywig, u r saying that all geocities sites are lacking credibility? I think not...your sarcasm shines right through- people must have a hard time being around someone such as yourself who knows they are right all the time. You have a talent of making people feel level with the curb...how appealing >>>NOT!


Reply With Quote

Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a Missle, NOT flight 77, Hit de Pentagon galaxy Conspiracy Theories 88 02-07-2011 08:07 PM
International Pet Flight mumbles Internet Scams 1 01-05-2010 10:09 AM
NorthWest Flight 188 FOLLOWED BY UFO ? ! Kevin Puppos Conspiracy Theories 4 11-01-2009 04:22 PM
9/11 Flight Contradicted Paladine Conspiracy Theories 1 04-20-2008 02:40 AM
Flight 77 Whispering wind Conspiracy Theories 4 03-17-2006 03:20 PM

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump




This site may contain advice, opinions and statements of various information providers. Scam.com does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided by any information provider, any User of this Site or any other person or entity. Reliance upon any such advice, opinion, statement, or other information shall also be at the Userís own risk. Neither Scam.com nor its affiliates, nor any of their respective agents, employees, information providers or content providers, shall be liable to any User or anyone else for any inaccuracy, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, alteration of or use of any content herein, or for its timeliness or completeness, nor shall they be liable for any failure of performance, computer virus or communication line failure, regardless of cause, or for any damages resulting therefrom. Just because a business, person, or entity is listed on scam.com does not necessarily constitute they are scammers. This is a free open forum where people can debate the merits from the consumer's or business owner's perspective. Registration and participation is always FREE.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.




Scam.com Is Proudly Hosted By Rackco and Protected By CloudFlare


Scams Message Board - Copyright 2004-2013 Scam.com , All Rights Reserved.